Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UC & Habitual Residency Test Fail?


adridude
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1986 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I moved to the UK in 2003 as my family are here. Mums british, dad's Dutch and I ended up with Dutch nationality.

 

I've worked, lived and paid tax, council tax etc... all the years with the od dperiods of unemployment so have been on JSA and Housing Benefits.

 

I applied for UC as I recently lost a job due to my driving license being revoked for 2 years.

 

After signing up, I was accepted and initially began to receive UC.

 

6 months down the line, another Habitual Residency test pops up and fails me. The initial was in February, the later in August.

 

The initial HRT letter reads as follows:

 

Dear ....

 

We're writing to tell you that you have passed the right to reside and habitual residence test. You have qualified as a person defined as an EEA national in the United Kingdom who is a worker. This will be reviewed if there is a change in your circumstances.

 

There should be no reason the latter popped up. SInce 2003, I haven't left the country once (not even on holiday). Between the initial HRT and the one that failed, nothing changed in my status at all.

 

The failed HRT letter reads:

 

Dear xyz

 

We're writing to tell you that unfortunately you're not entitled to Universal Credit. This is because we have decided that for Universal Credit purposes only, you do not have a right to reside and are consequently not habitually resident in the UK. This is because you are not a qualified person as defined in Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2016.

 

 

A qualified person is defined as a worker, self employed person, a jobseeker or a self sufficient person or self sufficient student. (Self sufficient means you must have resources in excess of the maximum allowable to a person claiming income related benefits and have fully comprehensive sickness insurance).

 

 

You have not provided any evidence, such as a Family residence or Family member permit issued by the Home Office and therefore, you cannot derive a right to reside from a family member.

 

A person can gain a permanent right of residence where they have resided in the United Kingdom in accordance with the 2016 Regulations for a continuous period of 5 years.

 

Therefore there is insufficient evidence to grant you a permanent right of residence for Universal Credit purposes.

 

A person who does not have a right to reside in the UK has to be treated as a person from abroad.

The law does not permit Universal Credit to be awarded to anyone who is a person from abroad.

 

I dont see where I've failed as:

 

1) The family is has been here longer than I have, mums british too..

2) I've been here for 13+ years uninterrupted

 

On that note, I've gone through the mandatory reconsideration, but the manager who processed it told me that its likely it'll fail.

 

I've supplied them with:

 

1) Copies of my parents passports

2) Birth papers

3) 10 years of doctors appointsments )from the surgery, to prove I was ehre

4) 10 years of bank statements as proof I've been here

5) 10 years of council tax bills and statements of payments

 

Failing that I have no idea what to do. I"m falling behind on rent, the Job Centre just wont entertain helping at all.

 

I'm avoiding speaking to the Dutch embassy unless I really have to, but any pointers will be handy.

 

*edit* as a matter of interest, the homeoffice have told me I can et a british passport, but I dont see why I need to give up my nationality for this?

Also does the permanent residency card help at all or is this just another useless form of ID?

 

Cheers,

 

Ade

Link to post
Share on other sites

HRT is quite complicated and you really need to discuss this with someone who deals with it on a daly basis. On Moneysavingsexpert benefits forum there is a lady from a rights organisation that has the knowledge that might be able to help you. They deal with people in your situation almost every day.

 

Your orginal decision was based on your being an EEA national who had a working history. From what I understand, if you are then out of work for 6 months, so need to continue to claim UC, they then find you ineligible. What you need to find, is someone who knows the legislation and rules very well.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll take a look into that.

 

Although I claimed at the end of january, I was self-sufficient until 1st may. I paid for everything myself, so was only awarded UC as from then.

 

 

Thanks for the heads up, I'll take a look on there..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just an update. CAB have referred my case to University if Kent (legal clinic) as apparently this is on the increase and they’re building up a case against the DWP.

 

I’m the meantime I’ve been keeping diaries of everything and keeping notes on the waywardness of the DWP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

This happened to me,

they also claimed i didnt have right to reside even though lived in uk for 21 years from age of 5.

they took 5/6 months messing me about.

 

in the end i applied for perm residence which was back dated to 2002 and applied for citizenship straight after.

Have gained britsh citizenship.

 

But am £20,000 in debt because i was not given universal credit and was unable put my daughter in nursery without help therefore unable to work.

 

The DWP are breaking the law and litrally taking the **** out of people, I am still debating whether or not to go to press with my story as I feel its happening to a number of people.

Edited by dx100uk
spelling grammar
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have fallen foul of the Genuine Prospect of Work rule which kicks in after six months for EEA claimants and have been sent the wrong letter.

 

I would raise a recon and see what happens explaining about family being here etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...