Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Deceased Parents Debt Phillips and Cohen


UriGagarin
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2036 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

Bit of Background

 

Both parents have died in the 15 months, and the Estate is effectively the house they lived in, to be split between myself and my 2 brothers.

 

Both of my brothers live in said house ( one is mentally handicapped and the other is his carer ).

 

My father left debts of around 66k ( one a equity release mortgage of 56k,which we have cleared. ) So we are left with the remainder of debt that has come from (so far) 3 accounts that Philips and Cohen are handling .

 

I am the Administrator of the estate, and ideally do not want to sell the house as it would leave a vulnerable adult and carer homeless.

 

Now these debt are likely to be in my fathers name only ( I've only just got the letters so not gone any further than here ), if that might make any difference.

 

So my first thought would be to check the legitimacy of each account/ statute barred status.

What's the current way of asking for the CCA/ proof of debt with these folks.

 

Many thanks

 

I'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Philips/cohens

Strange bed fellows

What are the debts please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not entirely sure as yet one is New Day for @ £380 and 2 from Santander ( £2500 and one £8k) .

 

 

The £8k one has one a note with "Original creditor Santander Personal Loans."

 

 

 

Beyond that , I have nothing.

 

 

 

Is a CCA the correct way to go about this ? Data Protection? Bit lost as to the best way forward.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

so

a newday Aqua credit card I would suspect

a satans bank loan for £8k

sayans bank £2500 I would suspect to be a bank OD I bet.

 

im just trying to find out why you are worried about them

if they don't have a charge on the property or a CCJ forget about them.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'm worried as I don't want to get into a situation where I end up having to sell the house from under my brothers.

 

We were planning on putting it in my name and having them pay rent ( to help pay off the remortgage and build up repair funds).

 

So would need to change the deeds etc.

 

So don't want vultures circling around and trying to get their hands on it.

 

Telling this lot to do one would ease my mind.

 

Well there's an unsatisfied judgement in my dad's name for £2k (via trust online. ) dated from 2015.

 

Probably stuck his head in the sand.

Bum.

 

May not be the Santander one though. Double Bum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well that cant happen can it

debts are his not your responsibility

most die with him.

 

now this CCJ is it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW

philips and cohen are VERY well know to try and fleecer people on deceased persons debts

 

bottom line is there is stuff and all they can do

read these threads

 

https://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:6449422593&ie=UTF-8&q=Philips+and+Cohen&sa=Search+CAG

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like it

go get his credit file

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We were planning on putting it in my name and having them pay rent ( to help pay off the remortgage and build up repair funds).

 

Be very careful about doing this especially if the occupants would be claiming housing benefits. Renting a property to a close family member is often viewed as a "contrived tenancy" and the council will invariably refuse to pay housing benefits.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debts only die with Deceased if they cannot be recovered from his Estate.

 

Yes, seems to me that the person legally responsible for the deceaseds estate needs to obtain all of the debt information and then obtain legal advice about best way to secure the property for the disabled person as well as their carer.

 

If there is still an equity release debt outstanding,then these creditors would still own equity in the property and would no doubt have terms about period of time in which any remaining balance must be settled.

 

If I were getting correspondence chasing debts, I would not respond at this stage.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks,

The Equity Release debt has been paid off ( essentially I am now the major creditor to the estate).

 

WRT Housing Benefit and contrived tenancy - we've looked into some of the ins and outs and we're reasonably confident there is an accepted way of doing this - of course we will get proper advice closer to the time.

 

So to sum up the replies/ situation :

 

I need to get my dad's Credit file and see what lurks there - go to Experian/Noddle ?

 

I suppose as I'm Administrator that makes sense. Best do so for Mum as well, just in case.

 

Web or write?

 

Check Land Registry for any other charge on property ( is there a place to go for that as the standard one via .gov doesn't seem to have anything about charges on the property?)

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

debts are his not your responsibility

most die with him.

 

Debts don't die with someone. They continue to be repayable from the Estate and the Executor/Administrator is under a legal duty to settle the deceased's debts from the Estate (as long as there is enough money in the Estate to do so). The Executor/Administrator has no personal liability for the deceased's debts though, only to pay from the Estate.

 

UriGagarin, are you formally appointed Administrator by the Probate division under Letters of Administration? ie because your father didn't leave a Will

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Executor/Administrator has no personal liability for the deceased's debts though, only to pay from the Estate.

 

If a creditor can show that the executor has been negligent in his/her duties in handling the estate, they could pursue the executor through the courts. This can generally be avoided by placing a Section 27 notice in the London Gazette. For further details, see: https://www.thegazette.co.uk/all-notices/content/137

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a creditor can show that the executor has been negligent in his/her duties in handling the estate, they could pursue the executor through the courts. This can generally be avoided by placing a Section 27 notice in the London Gazette. For further details, see: https://www.thegazette.co.uk/all-notices/content/137

 

The Gazette is next on my list for this.

I've created a login and had a look , but its a rather confusing interface so will take my time over that one. Not for late night.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ethel Street asked if you're officially Administrator of the estate, is that the case please?

 

 

HB

 

Yes to my mothers Estate - dad died only a few months before so its rolled into one - I replied Up there , obviously got missed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how old are these debts?

 

 

Intestacy has rules for dividing an estate so be very careful about how you go about things like transfer of property etc because you wont have the right to do so without a transfer of cash in the other direction. Handicapped relative will need court fo protection paperwork to look after their interests.

 

 

Also, sorting out mothers estate should be done after this job. It is likely that all of dads's estate goes to her unless it is over a certain amount and then when she died it passes on. Use that to your advantage to limit exposure to action by creditors if possible. For example if house owned as joint tenants then they will find it particularly hard to go after a charge on the property as it became your mothers the moment dad died. If owned solely by him or as tenants in common then it will be different.

 

 

personal effects arent part fo the estate so furniture and car wont be included, nor will most other stuff unless it is considered to be "important" or a collection. That way jewellery worth even thousands arent someones estate, just effects but a half a million quid painting is.

 

 

As for asking about the veracity fo the debt, tell them you cnat consider anything unless they furnish you with the necessary details (and I would ask for more detail than a standard CCA request). If they fail to do this then you dont have to consider their demands

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly. I was just asking because there's a difference between administering an estate and being appointed by the Probate Office via Letters of Administration.

 

 

HB

 

Oh is there ? Its from the Probate office - also why I'm saying that rather than Executor ( there was no Will)

Link to post
Share on other sites

how old are these debts?

 

 

Intestacy has rules for dividing an estate so be very careful about how you go about things like transfer of property etc because you wont have the right to do so without a transfer of cash in the other direction. Handicapped relative will need court fo protection paperwork to look after their interests.

 

 

Also, sorting out mothers estate should be done after this job. It is likely that all of dads's estate goes to her unless it is over a certain amount and then when she died it passes on. Use that to your advantage to limit exposure to action by creditors if possible. For example if house owned as joint tenants then they will find it particularly hard to go after a charge on the property as it became your mothers the moment dad died. If owned solely by him or as tenants in common then it will be different.

 

 

personal effects arent part fo the estate so furniture and car wont be included, nor will most other stuff unless it is considered to be "important" or a collection. That way jewellery worth even thousands arent someones estate, just effects but a half a million quid painting is.

 

 

As for asking about the veracity fo the debt, tell them you cnat consider anything unless they furnish you with the necessary details (and I would ask for more detail than a standard CCA request). If they fail to do this then you dont have to consider their demands

 

Thanks that's useful for me to consider.

Age of the debts I'm not 100% certain for all of them and some of my dad's have already been written off , I TH|INK these are the last , but will get a credit report and find out. My guess a lot will date back to around 2008, but whether any are statute barred is anyone's guess.

 

There's no paperwork that we could really find , only the Equity mortgage , which like I've said I've managed to pay.

Will investigate the Court of Protection route.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, if nothing has been paid towards them in the last 6 years then they are sb and you dont have to take any notice of Phillips and Cohen but a short letter telling them this would be wise to save you a bit of effort further on.

 

See what they have whee you ask for proof of the debt but dont tell them what you know at this stage, they probably have nothing other than a line on a printout from some other agency

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...