Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BVS and sheliahs wheels flood claim.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2031 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The story so far-

Discovered we had a leak as could hear water moving through the stopcock in kitchen,

rang insurance who informed me we were insured for the water damage but not for locating and fixing the leak.

 

I discovered a leaking pipe under the concrete floor slab in the kitchen,

i had to get up some tiles,

take out kitchen units and dig up a section of floor to access pipes and temp fix it.

 

We the noticed the walls behind the units were very damp and mouldy,

the skirting on the wall opposite was also then noticed to be swollen (mdf) and the mdf wall paneling in lounge had bowed out.

 

All walls were plaster board dabbed onto top of original plaster.

 

An assessor from bvs came out,

agreed was a genuine claim and were covered.

Gave me an estimate for refitting units,plaster repair and to re-tile floor.

 

I mentioned that the tiled floor seemed uneven,

advice was to get tiles up so drying company could come out,

if slab had moved it would be cracked and need replacing.

 

Tiles were removed and large cracks were found,slab has raised due to swelling of the sub soil,

was told to send in pics,

drying company put on hold.

 

It has taken 2 whole weeks to access the pics to decide it just needs drying and latex screed put on top!

 

I have had a company in to quote for floor and they agreed it needs replacing,

sent them an email with the quote and they are insisting the drying company still come out,

are they on commission???

 

Last few days have taken some walls down to bare brick as the plaster board was very damp and had black mould on the back of it,

original plaster just crumbled off.

 

Have today discovered the laminate floor in the lounge near the party wall is also water damaged as it has swollen up,

joists are wet along with the sub soil,

nasty damp smell aswell.

 

Advice im after is if after the drying company has been out and BVS still say floor only needs a screed over the top and do no nothing about the laminate flooring what is my nest move?

 

Are loss adjusters like morgan clarke worth using???

 

Its now getting on for a month since the claim was put in.

lots of stress,

house in a mess and nowhere to cook properly.

 

Hope the nightmare ends soon,

next insurance company will be one that does not use BVS,

as not impressed with them so far!

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Water damage is always more than expected.

They know it and that's why many insurance fix the leak and the surrounding areas very quickly so the customer doesn't see all the damage.

In your case the file is still open and you have found further damage to the original claim.

It needs to be bundled together.

Don't be in a rush, as you can see after many weeks the joists are still wet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The drying company, although experts in humidity, are not experts in flooring. I wouldn't get an Assessor company like Morgan Clarke as they will want their cut, which usually means requesting cash settlements so you would be out of pocket...

What I would do is get your own builder to come and do a quote, specifically advising what needs doing to put you back in the position you were in immediately before the loss.

 

To me though it looks like they want to put a screed above the uneven concrete floor to even out, then they would re-tile over that?

 

Have a word with the adjuster to see if that is correct...

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

After 2 weeks they finally agreed to replace the whole floor !

I was also advised i can claim for the kitchen unit carcasses we removed as during removal basically collapsed,were bandq flatpack ones the inserts which go in the cams to join them together basically pulled out,maybe due to the chipboard being soft from the damp,also signs of water ingress in the side panels.

Been to bandq and this style of kitchen no longer available so could we claim for a whole new one?

Also our lounge walls need the plasterboard replacing but the bottom third of the room is covered by mdf decorative panels a section of which is now warped/expanded.

Its in the scope of works to replace this section but it is no longer available from where we purchased it from,its fitted to every room in our house.

What normally happens in this situation where the original wall coverings are no longer available?

Link to post
Share on other sites

After 2 weeks they finally agreed to replace the whole floor !

I was also advised i can claim for the kitchen unit carcasses we removed as during removal basically collapsed,were bandq flatpack ones the inserts which go in the cams to join them together basically pulled out,maybeo due to the chipboard being soft from the damp,also signs of water ingress in the side panels.

Been to bandq and this style of kitchen no longer available so could we claim for a whole new one?

Also our lounge walls need the plasterboard replacing but the bottom third of the room is covered by mdf decorative panels a section of which is now warped/expanded.

Its in the scope of works to replace this section but it is no longer available from where we purchased it from,its fitted to every room in our house.

What normally happens in this situation where the original wall coverings are no longer available?

 

Unless you’ve paid extra or have a good policy you’ll have the matching items exclusion, which means they won’t pay for the non damaged items. However the FOS ask insurers to offer 50% of the unmatched items as a compromise.

This will apply for the kitchen, I can’t see it working for the mdf though. You can try.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant see any mention of a matching items exclusion anywherr in the policy.

Next step is get quotes for the work and if more than they offered send them

In, also a quote for a kitchen fitted.

Ball is in their court then

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...