Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
    • Send them a letter of claim straightaway. No point hanging around. Given 14 days in the letter of claim and if they haven't paid you by then, issue the claim on day 15. The amount of time is more than adequate for them to get going. Post your draft letter of claim here. A look at. Then log onto the MoneyClaim website and start preparing your claim and post your particulars of claim here for us to have a look at. Don't bluff. No point in it.
    • That's what we thought, but the store manager is inferring that, as the jeweller we used was not a member of the NJA, no one  would give what he said, any credence. The Jeweller we used is in fact, a long established, well respected company, with 2 store and rather than just being a retailer, they craft the most exquisite jewellery inhouse!  I wish my Fiancé would have bought from them rather than H Samuel! Do you think we do need to get another report from and NJA accredited Jeweller ?
    • Really pleased that you won. UKPC know that you have supremacy of contract but still they persist because so many motorists blindly pay them.   Muppets.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HMRC issues


HP Mum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2034 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I filed 13-14 accounts late.

I paid £100 penalty in the summer.

Normally I receive a letter of acknowledgement of receiving my return and whether I have any tax to pay a few months after filing.

I didn't hear from them so I chased in Sept/Oct - when they said there had been a processing problem with a bunch of returns that came in around the time mine must have arrived.

Last week I just received notification that I had £0 tax to pay.

Yet this week I received notification that I had £1200 penalty to pay.

How can this be?

No tax; yet such an enormous penalty.

 

 

I don't have any 'valid' excuse for being late. And I don't have enough £s to pay it either.

What can I write to ask them to waive such a huge penalty??

Any kind of advice is welcome, thanks...

 

If you were more than 6 months late filing, (rather than the delay being at their end) but less than 12 months late, the total penalty is £1300, which is where you might have the £1200 from if you have already paid £100.

How late were you in filing?

 

You could appeal to their good nature and generosity, highlighting that you've never been late before and didn't know of the penalties.

However "ignorance is no defence", but for someone with a clean slate and no reason to already be aware it might be worth a try.

 

For ideas as to what they regard as reasonable excuse (& what isn't!)

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/354412/sa370-notes.pdf

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?357282-Tax-Return-Late-Filing-Query-on-fine-and-zero-tax&p=3903257#post3903257

 

Ohh. You've been here before (2012).

I doubt you'll get given much leeway.

 

What was the outcome in 2012?. You never updated that thread with the result of your appeal and if you had to pay in the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hello

 

I am looking at releasing a large % share of my residential property, to an investor.

 

Its currently my prime residence. But I want to get some cash out of it, pay down borrowing, move out, and run it as a short-term joint venture BTL - until the market improves.

 

Would the in-coming investor be liable for sdlt?

Its not a huge issue, it just affects the yield proposal.

 

Are they buying - Thus liable for sdlt on their %?

 

Or is it an investment - No sdlt?

Just a legal arrangement that an (equal value) % of the rental income goes to the investor?

 

I think I understand that if the investor later wanted 100% ownership - that the initial cash investment would retrospectively be considered exchange? With sdlt liable to them upon completion?

 

We rent / then sell when market improves.

Just a legal arrangement that an (equal value) % of the sale price is paid to the investor upon sale? So no sdlt to investor?

Just the incoming purchaser pays sdlt on the full value at that time?

 

 

It seems a bit confusing to me that sdlt could be paid twice on the same property??? Once as an investment into the asset to receive rental income and secondly when the property gets sold to a 3rd party.

 

How does it work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks honeybee. That's what I thought too. So any investment should be considered a 'loan', much like a bank loan, with a charge. Then the investment is secure and there would be no sdlt to pay. I need to find an investor ready to invest in the 'project' - then lawyers can get involved with creating a clear agreement. In an ideal world

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

but you will pay more stamp duty on your new property as you will have more than one to your name.

It may be wiser to set up a limited company and each invest in that to create a share book fo say a nominal £12 worth of shares and each has as many as their capital interest. So, if the house is worth £300k and investor is giving you £200k then your holding will be £4 and theirs £8.

That may well avoid a big stamp duty bill on the transfer of the deeds adn save you both money as income will be via dividends rather than earningsa nd CGT will be less when you sell up. Also you wont have 2 houses so lower stamp duty when you downsize.

The real fly in the ointment will be getting a watertight contract drawn up for the creation of the LC or you might find yourslef homeless if you have chosen a wrong un to do business with

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks ericsbrother

I think I may give up on this idea. Its getting complicated and I want a simple life!!

Without going in to too much confusing detail - I don't want to buy a new property - I am splitting one lease into 2 leases with (my) FH ownership remaining the same under both. I wanted to keep one lease property for myself to reside in and take a partner on the other lease to run as a btl - so releasing some equity (to pay off current borrowing) and have a rental income... But it is getting awkward on valuations in this current depressed market.. And the investment/ sdlt issue is a moot point.

Lawyers have done the work (not sure how they did it legally) / revised titles are not registered yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to HMRC issues
  • dx100uk changed the title to Tax Implications on sale of sole property/part rented
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...