Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor CCJ for Windows Installation - now Marstons Bailiff writ


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2039 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First post so Hi and thanks for any advice offered.

 

Had some windows/doors installed by a local firm in a self build property.

 

There’s been issues since the start, leaking sliding doors, bay window out of square, no keys for window locks, runners corroded. The company haven’t been the most helpful in rectifying anything.

 

I moved into the house I was building in March 2016 and I’ve had visits from the companies employees whilst I was living there, the last one about April/may.

 

I still owed 10% of the £15k for the full job which I told them I would pay when my concerns were sorted.

 

2 weeks ago I settled the outstanding amount as I am going to take it to the small claims court.

 

The guy I sold the house to works away and he dropped a handful of letters off last week from solicitors, ccj and bailiff visits with extra charges, all dating back to July/August.

This was the first knowledge I had of a ccj and a writ.

 

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you've not informed anyone of your correct address, so everything was served to the old one.?

 

can you scan up what you have received to ONE multipage PDF

read Upload.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I moved out March 16.

All communication has been via email/telephone since I ordered the windows.

 

Never gave it a thought to be honest, they’ve been back and forth to the property with me living in it, it’s been complete for over 18mths.

 

I’m away from home till tomorrow, I’ll see if I can upload them then.

 

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

so you've never informed them that you are now living at another address?

so they quite legally served everything to the old address

 

I wouldn't be ignoring the bailiff writ letter

next step will be bailiffs at your door where you are now.

 

if the debt is over £600 then these will be HCEO's too I bet.

 

atleast scan up what you've had from the bailiff co please..who is?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiff is marstons

 

I haven’t purposely with held info from the company, the windows were fitted in the property I’m now living in. Their employees have been to try and rectify the problems on numerous occasions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so operating as Highcourt enforcement officers?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

From what you have written, the creditor had every reason to believe that the address on the claim form (and eventual Judgment) was correct.

 

It is vitally important to have the exact dates of the letter from the court advising of the Judgment and the date of the Notice of Enforcement from Marston's. If a visit has taken place, that visit date will also be needed.

 

If a Writ of Control had been issued, additional fees would have been added to the judgment amount. If you made payment after the case had been passed to Marston's, then to 'amount due' would have ALSO included the Compliance fee. It would seem that your payment made two weeks ago is merely a payment on account.

 

There is a procedure available to you to have the judgment 'set aside' but unfortunately, these applications are not straightforward. Please post back to let us know the dates of the letters etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, thanks so much for taking the time to look at this its much appreciated!

 

Ordered windows/doors approx oct 2015.

Window and 1 door was fitted approx Nov 2015.

£13714 was paid leaving £1500 balance.

 

Last door was fitted in mid March 2016. 4 months late.

 

I sold my old property on 31 March 2016 and moved into my new place.

 

There has been numerous emails, telephone calls and visits from the company right up until about May 2018 whilst I have been living in the property.

I have used my new address as the subject of my emails.

 

My post was redirected via royal mail until about June 2018.

 

4th June 2018 Redirected - Letter from solicitors asking for payment.

I responded via letter to the solicitors giving my new address and my issues.

Also responded to company stating my concerns and reasons for with holding payment.

 

I had a reply via email from the company, stating none of the problems were their fault or they knew nothing about it despite e-mails sent previously.

 

31 August - paid the £1500 balance via bank transfer to the companies bank account.

My thoughts were to claim off the guarantee (which I haven’t got yet) or take it via the small claims court.

 

5th September a letter that had been delivered to my old address was posted through my door.

 

Letter was dated 24 August from Marstons saying a high court writ for £2519.71 had been issued.

 

I replied via e-mail immediately explaining I didn’t live there, the debt had been paid and this was the first I knew about it.

 

6th Sept, more letters were hand delivered through my door

 

13 July 2018 - Solicitor saying a county court claim form had been issued.

 

3th July 2018 - A claim form from the County court

 

3rd August - A CCJ Judgement for £1975.8

 

7th August - Marstons Notice of enforcement For £2185.28

 

8th August - Solicitors letter stating a CCJ had been issued For £2093.55 and I’d be hearing from a Bailiff direct.

 

24th August 2018 - A printed/hand written letter from Marstons with the following costs added

Judgment - £2093.55

Interest - £ 8.30

Compliance fee - £90.00

Enforcement stage 1 fee - £326.98

Total - £2518.83

 

6th Sept 2018 Phoned Marstons and explained I had no knowledge of this but all they wanted was for me to clear the balance.

 

I’ve been on a family holiday in spain this week, Sat to Sat.

I had a telephone call from the Enforcement agent on thursday but it rang off after a couple of seconds.

 

My thoughts are to phone on Monday and try to sort a paymant plan for whatever the remaining balance is, whilst I try and get this all sorted out.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So have you a copy of the claimform

What address is on it please

What date is on it top right

 

You say you have already paid the sum the ccj - when

Some of your dates above must be wrong?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Date is 13 July2018

The address is my old house, the one I sold in march 2016.

Amount is £1947.08

The £1500 was paid on 31st August.

The guy that bought my old house works in the middle east and I assume the letters have been lying there untill he returned on leave.

 

Sorry, yeah the date of the claim form is wrong.

 

Firstly, thanks so much for taking the time to look at this its much appreciated!

 

Ordered windows/doors approx oct 2015.

Window and 1 door was fitted approx Nov 2015.

£13714 was paid leaving £1500 balance.

 

Last door was fitted in mid March 2016. 4 months late.

 

I sold my old property on 31 March 2016 and moved into my new place.

 

There has been numerous emails, telephone calls and visits from the company right up until about May 2018 whilst I have been living in the property.

I have used my new address as the subject of my emails.

 

My post was redirected via royal mail until about June 2018.

 

4th June 2018 Redirected - Letter from solicitors asking for payment.

I responded via letter to the solicitors giving my new address and my issues.

Also responded to company stating my concerns and reasons for with holding payment.

 

I had a reply via email from the company, stating none of the problems were their fault or they knew nothing about it despite e-mails sent previously.

 

31 August - paid the £1500 balance via bank transfer to the companies bank account.

My thoughts were to claim off the guarantee (which I haven’t got yet) or take it via the small claimsicon court.

 

5th September a letter that had been delivered to my old address was posted through my door.

 

Letter was dated 24 August from Marstons saying a high court writ for £2519.71 had been issued.

 

I replied via e-mail immediately explaining I didn’t live there, the debt had been paid and this was the first I knew about it.

 

6th Sept, more letters were hand delivered through my door

 

13 July 2018 - Solicitor saying a county courticon claim form had been issued.

 

13th July 2018 - A claim form from the County court

 

3rd August - A CCJ Judgement for £1975.8

 

7th August - Marstons Notice of enforcement For £2185.28

 

8th August - Solicitors letter stating a CCJ had been issued For £2093.55 and I’d be hearing from a Bailiff direct.

 

24th August 2018 - A printed/hand written letter from Marstons with the following costs added

Judgment - £2093.55

Interest - £ 8.30

Compliance fee - £90.00

Enforcement stage 1 fee - £326.98

Total - £2518.83

 

6th Sept 2018 Phoned Marstons and explained I had no knowledge of this but all they wanted was for me to clear the balance.

 

I’ve been on a family holiday in spain this week, Sat to Sat.

I had a telephone callicon from the Enforcement agent on thursday but it rang off after a couple of seconds.

 

My thoughts are to phone on Monday and try to sort a paymant plan for whatever the remaining balance is, whilst I try and get this all sorted out.

 

Thanks again.

Edited by Russ295
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thanks for that

 

Yes your last sentence is the correct way to proceed now..sadly!!

 

Dont think you can resit this in anyway

The judgement was issued 3rd aug

You paid 28th

With the bank holiday

I expect the payment did not land for a good few days

 

If/if not a new claim by you because of faulty workmanship or WHY works is asep matter totally

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Please do not take offence with my response but the way that I see it, you had new windows and a door fitted almost 3 years ago (in November 2015). You appear to have been disappointed with the quality of the finished product and as a consequence, withheld £1,500. I am assuming that the quality of the windows did not hinder the sale of your home 5 months later (in March 2016).

 

Fast forward to June 2018 when you received a letter from solicitors that had been redirected from your previous address. That letter sought payment. What was the exact figure stated in that letter?

 

I am confused by your comment. Can you clarify?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No offence taken, the windows were fitted in my new home that I'm still living in, not the home I sold in march 2016.

All visits to try and sort out the problems have been whilst I have been living in the new address. The last one was about May this year.

 

The letter dated in June was for £1500. I responded to the solicitor via letter with my reasons for with holding my payment and my new address.

 

All correspondences have still been send to my old address after that and then hand delivered, I assume by the new owner, through my door.

 

Again just to clarify.

The new house (where the windows have been fitted) is a self build, bought a bit of land and started building in about March 2105.

 

Put my old house up for sale in November 2015 and moved out at the end of March 2016.

 

Thanks again, it’s all got my head swivelled tbh, never had to deal with anything like this before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So for clarity the suppliers solicitor had your new address all along before commencing proceedings in the County Court?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Russ295 said:

 

I moved into the house I was building in March 2016 and I’ve had visits from the companies employees whilst I was living there, the last one about April/may.

 

The guy I sold the house to works away and he dropped a handful of letters off last week from solicitors, ccj and bailiff visits with extra charges, all dating back to

 

It was these above comments from your initial post that confused me. In hindsight, it would have been better if you had said something like this:

 

Quote
I moved into the house I was building in March 2016 and since living here, I’ve had visits from the companies employees, the last one about April/May 2018.

 

During the period that I was building my house, I lived at another property. It was while living at this other property that I ordered the windows and doors for my new build. I sold that particular house in March 2016.

 

brassnecked said:
So for clarity the suppliers solicitor had your new address all along before commencing proceedings in the County Court?

 

My thoughts entirely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. I replied to the first letter I received letting them know I didn’t live there and details of my new address.

Everything that has turned up since has been delivered to my old address, but hand delivered (to my new address) first week of September.

Edited by Russ295
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

My post was redirected via royal mail until about June 2018.

 

4th June 2018 Redirected - Letter from solicitors asking for payment. I responded via letter to the solicitors giving my new address and my issues.

 

Also responded to company stating my concerns and reasons for with holding payment.

 

I had a reply via email from the company, stating none of the problems were their fault or they knew nothing about it despite e-mails sent previously.

 

You received a letter from the solicitors dated 4th June. This letter was received whilst the Royal Mail postal redirect was in place. You responded to the solicitor BY LETTER. You stated in that letter that you had moved address. Did you state WHEN you had moved address? Were the solicitors aware BEFORE this letter that you had moved in 2016?

 

You confirm that the window company responded to your correspondence (to state that they were not responsible etc). HOWEVER.....and this may be where the problem arises.....you have not mentioned whether you received a reply from the solicitors.

 

PS: Most important of all, what date did you respond to the solicitors letter (dated 4th June 2018)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

4th June, solicitors letter asking for £1500, redirected from my old address.

I posted my reply the following day, probably the 6/7 June 2018.

I have a copy of the letter sent.

 

Yes I told them when and where I had moved to.

 

As this was the only letter I’d ever received from them they wouldn’t have known.

 

Window company responded via email.

No response from the solicitors.

 

Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Backdoor CCJ for Windows Installation - now Marstons Bailiff writ
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...