Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • depends what the fees are, typically nothing can be added once judgement is passed bar litigation costs. on document retention time limits etc at least 6yrs previous must be held though many hold complete info. as for acronyms and abbreviations ideally yes they should     
    • Still have to submit a statement either system....if they fail they can only give verbal because they failed to file and serve.
    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Stipulations in a will


Niggle44
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2047 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter has recently been left a large sum of money and we have been advised that the will stipulates the funds are paid to and held by my wife.

 

The funds are to be used to help our daughter purchase a property for herself and her children. Whilst the idea is very well intentioned our daughter would like to use some of the funds to help out with immediate needs for herself and family.

 

How legally restrained is my wife in releasing funds ?. (we have not seen the will itself and have only received a letter from the executing solicitor saying how much money , how it is supposed to be used and a request for suitable banking details for them to transfer the funds).

There is also a concern as to whether such a large sum appearing in our bank will be seen as income and the tax man get involved. ( will banks create a trust fund account ?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask the Executing Solicitor for a copy of the Will and his understanding of the Deceased's reasoning.

Deceased may have thought your dau may fritter away the Capital sum , without parental oversight.

You may need Court approval to vary the Terms of the Will.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My daughter has recently been left a large sum of money and we have been advised that the will stipulates the funds are paid to and held by my wife.

 

There is also a concern as to whether such a large sum appearing in our bank will be seen as income and the tax man get involved. ( will banks create a trust fund account ?)

 

Without knowing the exact wording of the will, it sound like your wife is being nominated as a trustee to oversee the funds. I would recommend taking qualified legal advice on how to set up and manage a trust. Properly set up, there shouldn't be any tax implications for anyone involved.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an unusual provision when the beneficiary is an adult. Was the Will originally written when your daughter was a minor?

 

 

Once Probate has been granted, which it presumably has in this case, a Will is a public document. If you want to check out what it says without asking the solicitor for it see if it's on here https://www.gov.uk/search-will-probate Wills should be on there 14 days after Probate is issued. Costs £10. Says it can take up to 2 weeks to send you a copy (which is done by a downloadable pdf) but when I've used it it only took a few days. Subsequently ask the solicitor dealing with the Estate for certified copy of the Will. This will be asked for when you open an account for the money.

 

 

Your wife needs to get advice (from her own Solicitor, not the one acting for the Estate) on what sort of Trust has been set up by the Will and what her obligations are as a Trustee. Especially as it involves a large sum of money. The legal constraints on releasing funds to the beneficiary (your daughter) will depend both on what the Will says and the type of Trust that has been established. Independent legal advice is essential. Your question cannot be answered here.

 

I have been a Trustee under a trust set up by a Will and it's very complex. Not only does the trusteeship of the funds have lots of legal issues your wife will also have to register the Trust with the HMRC Trusts and Estates office in Nottingham and complete annual tax returns for the Trust funds. I thought I was reasonably clued up on HMRC and tax until I became a Trustee of a trust set up under a Will. I wouldn't do it again! Nightmare and very time consuming. I'd pay a solicitor or accountant to prepare the tax returns another time. Even if the Trust has been properly set up (which might turn out to be a big assumption) I wouldn't agree with the comment that there should be no tax implications. Not in my experience, anyway. Professional advice needed. However, your experience may be much simpler than mine, - I hope so anyway. I had to run the Trust for 5 years until the beneficiary reached a certain age. If you are able to transfer all the money to your daughter almost immediately and then wind up the Trust all in the same tax year it should be a lot simpler than it was for me.

 

When your wife is appointing a solicitor to advise her she should talk to several local firms and find one that has a specialist Partner in Trust and Probate. Many small solicitors firms don't.

 

 

Banks will open an account in the name of the trust fund. Go in and see your local branch. I'd like to say it was straightforward but when I did it was an infuriating process. The local branch I opened it at turned out to have zero understanding of what a Trust was, let alone how to set the account up on their system! Under money laundering regulations they will, I am sure, want to know the source of the funds. However, the solicitor dealing with the Estate can provide a letter confirming its source. They will also need to see the Will. My local bank also insisted on the Death Certificate as well as Probate document, despite me pointing out that the Probate Registry doesn't grant Probate unless they know the person is dead! The bank didn't understand that either....

 

 

Do not pay the funds into your own/your wife's personal bank accounts. Trustees must keep Trust funds separate from their own money. Funds must not be commingled, open the account before accepting a transfer from the Estate solicitor.

 

Good luck!

 

PS The Will may not give the Trust a name in which case you'll need to name it yourself to open an account and to run the affairs of the Trust. My solicitor said you can call it what you like but typically if the deceased was John Smith you'd name it 'The John Smith Will Trust'

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't agree with the comment that there should be no tax implications. Not in my experience, anyway. Professional advice needed.

 

 

I should have been a little more specific. There shouldn't be any tax implications for the wife or daughter. The trust may well be subject to tax, and I totally agree that professional advice is essential.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Mr P. Certainly for OP's wife, if her sole role is Trustee there shouldn't be any implications for her personal tax as none of the money is hers. She only holds it on trust for the beneficiary. That underlines why it is important to keep Trust funds completely separate from the Trustee's own money, different bank accounts etc. The beneficiary (daughter's) position needs advice but hopefully won't have tax implications if it's being left as a capital sum (that isn't tax advice :-) ). In general legacies received under a Will are not taxable as income.

 

The tax position of the Trust itself, I have learned from my experience, could be anything from very simple to a nightmare! Definitely needs professional advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem I see is that unless she finds a property of exactly the amount of the inheritance, there's no explanation in the will about what to do with leftover money.

Could she buy a cheaper property and use the surplus to redecorate it or buy furniture?

Professional advice needed, I agree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"My daughter has recently been left a large sum of money and we have been advised that the will stipulates the funds are paid to and held by my wife".

 

Who said anything about Trusts, if your wife was a trustee she would already know about it. All the answers above are overly complicated. Your wife receives the money, gives it to your Daughter. No one should know.

Only God will know it wasn't used for its intended purpose.

 

Except you just posted it on a public forum.................................................

 

H

44 years at the pointy end of the motor trade. :eek:

GARUDALINUX.ORG

Garuda Linux comes with a variety of desktop environments like KDE, GNOME, Cinnamon, XFCE, LXQt-kwin, Wayfire, Qtile, i3wm and Sway to choose from.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"My daughter has recently been left a large sum of money and we have been advised that the will stipulates the funds are paid to and held by my wife".

 

Who said anything about Trusts, if your wife was a trustee she would already know about it.

 

 

"...paid to and held by my wife" is a perfect example of the legal definition of a Trust!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I would ask the solicitor for a copy of the will or at least a copy of the provisions relating to your wife and daughter.

 

Hopefully this will all become much clearer when you know the exact wording of the will. Your wife can then make an informed decision as to whether she requires professional advice or not.

 

If this is a 'bare trust', which may be the case if the daughter is the only beneficiary, the daughter would be legally entitled to require your wife to transfer the money to her anyway. Unless the will says something unusual I suspect there will be no issue with transferring the money to the daughter now.

 

I don't see how the tax man would get involved as this is clearly an inheritance rather than income, the solicitor's letter is more than enough proof of that.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...