Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor E-On CCJ Brothers Debt- default judgement


Ftgab19
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2038 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

My brother has received a letter today from the county court business centre that was headed Judgement for Claimant (in default)

 

It says you have not replied to the claim form (never received anything from the claimantt E-On) It is therefore ordered that you must pay the claimant £727.27 for debt and interest to date of judgement and £60 for costs.

 

My brother has never received any court papers or even letters threatening court. But now he’s had this in the post. I’ll upload a scan of it but I’m not sure how to respond to the court document.

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated

 

Thanks

Andrew

1AA76C8D-D387-4660-B99D-FC2143E21B85.jpeg

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has he changed address within the last 5 years Ftgab19 ?

 

If so did he inform them of change of address?

 

If not and its his supplier whats the history of the debt...was there a dispute ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

He has moved address but e-on was our last suppler for the address we live at now.

 

I live with my brother but the debt wasn’t in dispute we just couldn’t afford to pay it.

 

The debt was with e-on’s recovery department.

 

We hadn’t heard anything for awhile then he got this letter.

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

the address the judgement states ...he has moved from there yes?

and no longer has access to receive mail from that address...

 

so if he didn't inform creditors or owners of debt since the moved then theres not really a lot he can do sadly.

never run away from debts...

else backdoor CCJ's [as in this case] will appear and its then too late to do anything about them.

 

the judgement debt is for over £600 so there might well be bailiffs soon too.

 

tell us about the debt

was it just old bills he did not pay that were owing when he moved?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A redetermination ( N245) [if within the 14 days which is free] to vary the judgement into a manageable monthly repayment?

you'll need to send an I&E form too I think

Edited by Andyorch
Edited n244

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No we moved into the address on the court paper in Oct 2017.

When we moved in the gas and Electric was with e-on.

We was managing to pay it but we got a surprise bill when we changed suppliers and ending up falling behind.

 

We was getting letters saying we need to pay but we didn’t get any letters about going to court until today.

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you are [or were] at your present address using e-on

 

so under that information you reasonably assume that e-on know where your brother now lives..so why serve all the paperwork until judgement to the old address?

 

the judgement debt was billed in his name, is [or was ] the e-on account at your present address in his name too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk

 

We moved into the address were at now in Oct 2017. The gas and electric was with e-On when we moved in.

 

We managed to pay until about April/May 2018 then ended up falling behind on payments and by July it was with there debt recover department.

 

We didn’t get any letters after July then we got the court papers yesterday.

 

E-on didn’t know our old address so I don’t think they’ve sent them there I can only assume they wasn’t sent or got lost in the post.

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok shame you came back late the courts close at 4pm

 

you'll have to wait till Monday now

but go give northants bulk a ring and ask for a copy of the CCJ and the Claimform by email PDF.

 

if that's got your present address on it

you have a reason to set the CCJ a side

 

but you'll also need a defence for the original debt,

£700+ seems like a lot of debt for such a short period mind.

when did you switch to your new supplier please?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk what’s nothants bulk?

 

And I thought it was wrong too thought maybe 300 to 400 but not 700. Where would I find a case to research? And I’ll get the exact date for you but I think may/June

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry i left out the r

Northants bulk. Clickit

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

quicker to ring

email wont get seen till Monday anyway...

 

hover over the link in post 12

you'll need the claim no from your upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I only got in late last night but my brother called them up on Monday and they said they don’t keep copies of the claim form and the document I already have the one I uploaded to here is the CCJ.

 

They sent me a copy of the particulars of claim that I’ll post here and they said the claim form was posted on the 17/08/2018 and the ccj was posted on the 11/09/2018

 

Particulars of claim

 

Regards THE CLAIMANTS CLAIM IS FOR MONIES OWED TO THE CLAIMANT FOR ELECTRICITY AND/OR GAS SUPPLIED TO THE PREMISES OF THE DEFENDANT. PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF SUPPLY AGREED AND/OR DEEMED BY VIRTUE OF SCHEDULE 6 OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT 1989 AND/OR SCHEDULE 2B OF THE GAS ACT 1986 PAYMENT WAS DUE FOR ENERGY SUPPLIED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS AFTER DELIVERY OF THE CLAIMANTS INVOICE.

 

THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO PAY THE INVOICES RENDERED. ENERGY/INVOICES FOR (A) ELECTRIC - at.... INVOICES RENDERED UP TO AND INCLUDING 24 MAY 2018 - £710.15 AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £710.15 AND £13.23 INTEREST PURSUANT TO S69 COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT 8% PER ANNUM FROM DATE INVOICES BECAME DUE TO THE DATE HEREOF AND CONTINUING AT £0.16 (DAILY RATE) PER DAY UNTIL JUDGMENT OR PAYMENT

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive removed the address!

 

So what address was that

And what address was that served too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry about that and that’s the address that’s on the CCJ the address we live at now and the one we had with e-on but nothing but the CCJ has been posted here

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

we are trying to establish if the claimform [not the CCJ, not the judgement] was served to your current address when they already knew it but was purposefully served to the OLD address so you never saw it and thus got a default judgement on purpose not giving you the chance to defend it.

 

 

your above post is clear as mud in trying to understand that.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They couldn’t of sent it to an old address they don’t know about are old address. We was with British Gas then we only had e-on when we moved to this current address.

 

Sorry if I’ve made that difficult to understand.

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we've got there....

 

one last q..

 

was e-on the supplier at the old address in your brothers name?

you say the address in the POC you typed out IS your CURRENT address?

 

just trying to cover all angles

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry at the old address the gas and electricity was in my name and it was with British gas.

 

When we moved to the address where at now we put the gas and electricity in my brothers name with e-on. I lived with my brother at both addresses.

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok good all clear now.

Shame you even mentioned the old address

It has nowt to with anything...

 

I would expect the debt is because your DD was not high enough

 

But that will be £780 over only 7 mts so they were undercharging you by £100pcm? Seems a bit high to me

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...