Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help! Used my parents 60+ TFL card not knowing it was a high value pass and face a conviction


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2053 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have discovered your site investigating what to do in this case and would sincerely appreciate your help.

I will offer feedback and donate for your time and energy.

I really need your help.

 

I used my mums oyster after losing my wallet and needed to get to a wedding over a weekend.

When returning into London, the high value pass obviously flagged things to the inspectors who were waiting at the station.

I had all my details taken.

The inspector understood I'd lost my wallet and I didn't answer any further questions.

I was sent a letter with a fine and a conviction if i plead guilty.

 

The problem with these cases, is that whether or not I did it unwittingly (as in, didn't realise I was using a high value pass) it doesn't matter.

It was a misuse and the conviction stands.

 

I can't have a conviction hanging over my head and the thought of it fills me with absolute dread.

I have just recently gained a permanent residency in Canada and intend eventually to work in the States and a conviction would be so detrimental to have on my record and affect my work situation.

 

I am so deeply regretful for something so stupid and avoidable.

 

I have received a letter stating the fine i have to pay and the fact that it will go on my record and like the other cases stated here on the forum, can either plead guility and pay the fine or plead not guilty and prove my innocence, which isn't possible.

 

What are the options available to me?

 

Can I call them and ask to appeal?

 

Should I hire a solicitor before it's too late? (I have roughly 10 days before the deadline now).

 

Is settling on the day the last option available and should I get a solicitor before that time to make sure that I don't risk it not going in my favour on the final day?

How often are people able to settle on the day in your opinion?

 

What does a settlement amount normally come to?

 

I really appreciate your help on this.

I've just returned to London to the letter and have limited time to respond and would like to know the best way to reach out to TFL.

Will a letter take too long.

I think so.

 

Should I simply call them or go via a solicitor?

It seems that no matter what people do with their letters, it always comes back with a conviction and fine.

 

I was going to call citizens advice first thing tomorrow, but if you can recommend a solicitor please do. i live in London.

 

Many thanks

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

we cant recommend solicitors, its against site rules anyway.

and you don't need one.

 

there are numerous cases here whereby an out of court settlement is gained

you've just got to grovel and plead your case

esp as a conviction will harm your future in Canada.

 

so you have a letter asking for your side of the story etc.?

 

when was the incident and when must you reply by please?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for your quick reply.

The incident was on the weekend of June 24/25th

 

I have to reply within 20 days, which will now be the 18th Sept.

I received the letter on the 29th, but was out of the country until yesterday.

 

This is the second letter from them responding to my initial response.

 

In my initial repsonse I replied to them by email- frustratingly I wasn't aware that it could lead to a prosecution,

I replied with the basic information they wanted, which was name, DOB, case number etc. Just personal information and also the admittance of using the oyster that wasn't mine, which they asked for.

 

In addition to the basic details they asked for I wrote:

"I accept committing the offence and deeply regret any distress it may have caused. It was highly unfortunate, out of the ordinary and certainly won't be repeated.

Please do let me know how TFL normally proceed in these circumstances."

 

I didn't realise it would lead to a serious prosecution and i would have written something more detailed if I'd known.

 

What would the next step be?

I don't know who to contact to appeal this decision.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

This is the second letter I have received from them. It's titled "Single Justice Procedure Notice". It doesn't have a court date, but it states I have 21 days to plead either guilty or not guilty to the offence. The rest of the letter is the details of the charge, the staement from the inspector and the form for filling out financial details.

 

The first letter I was originally sent asked to provide any exceptional reasons as to why they should not proceed with a prosecution- but I simply didn't realise the gravity of what that meant. I sincerely apologised for my actions, but didn't think I would be facing an actual conviction.

 

Can I still reply with a detail for my mitigating circumstances? Should I call them to let them know that this is what i plan to do?

 

I'm currently trying to draft a letter and would sincerely appreciate your help moving forward and will of course offer a donation. I can't afford a solicitor's fee and am unable to reach a citizens advice advisor over the phone.

 

Please let me know if you are able to help

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if the Single Justice System changes anything, but we've always advised people to keep negotiating with the person who's written to them to ask if they will allow you to pay an adminstrative penalty and their costs in dealing with your case.

 

 

Some people have managed to agree a resolution with the prosecutor on the day of the court case if there's a hearing.

 

 

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB,

 

 

Thank you. It gives a number of ways to respond to the plea:

-Online Plea which would allow me to submit the plea online

-help submitting plea by telephone

- By post to the Magistrates Court

- or to contact TFL by email

 

 

It doesn't say directly who i should contact if i wish to appeal or talk it through with someone. In this case- do you think I should call the "help to submit your plea, telephone" and ask for the best person to contact in this case? And explain to them that i'd like to respond to TFL with a letter of appeal? Or email TFL directly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a shame.

 

 

I would still suggest that you try to ring TfL and ask if they will let you cover their costs, and pay an admin charge. Have a read of other threads where people have used someone else's card, we have a few when they reached an out of court settlement and ring when you've figured out what to say. If there's a case number, hopefully they can put you on to the person dealing with it.

 

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB,

 

 

Thank you. It gives a number of ways to respond to the plea:

-Online Plea which would allow me to submit the plea online

-help submitting plea by telephone

- By post to the Magistrates Court

- or to contact TFL by email

 

 

It doesn't say directly who i should contact if i wish to appeal or talk it through with someone. In this case- do you think I should call the "help to submit your plea, telephone" and ask for the best person to contact in this case? And explain to them that i'd like to respond to TFL with a letter of appeal? Or email TFL directly?

 

You really MUST respond to the Singe Justice Procedure (SJP) notice and do so BEFORE the 'cut off' date. Clearly, you will need to plead guilty and by doing so, you will benefit from having a one third discount in the amount of the fine issued. You do not....I repeat NOT need to enlist the help of a solicitor and by pleading guilty, you will NOT be required to attend a hearing.

 

I will visit the thread later when I finish work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...