Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

National Engine Center cardif


scanner
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2047 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

can someone please advise.

 

I sent my car to national engine center to have the engine replaced.

the car was returned with body damage and had 30Miles extra on the clock.

 

I paid for it through paypal and after opening a dispute this garage finally agreed to take the car back on condition that the paypal case be closed,

they agreed to repair the list of damage I provided and within 7 days return the car.

on day 14 they sent the car in for a MOT without consulting me first, the car failed.

 

it has now been 3 weeks and they won't return the vehicle,

they say I can fetch it if I want as they are waiting for an order from my area and only then will they be able to deliver my car.

 

the only way I have of fetching this vehicle is to have it transported,

something they should be doing as this was the agreement they entered into on Paypal and it is part of their service they offer.

 

They wanted to drive the car to me from Cardif to outer London (without asking me).

Every time I speak to the Owner he threatens to remove the engine refund my money and return the car with the original engine on a pallet.

so I am in a bit of a pickle as to what course of action to take, and how do I get them to just bring my car back

Link to post
Share on other sites

consumer rights act.

send him a letter demanding what you want to happen

give him 14 days

then issue a letter [court] before action.

 

how do you pay paypal.?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I paid through Paypal with a debit card attached to my paypal account.

 

Paypal advised them to request the case be closed.

I closed it but arranged with paypal that I get 14 days to reopen.

 

Paypal now have a ticket open escalating the case to senior management and will update me in 72 hours.

 

My concern is , am I poking a hornets nest if I start down the court route.

What happens if the garage removes the engine and leaves my car and engine outside their premises, refusing to deliver.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"They wanted to drive the car to me from Cardif to outer London"

Why don't you let them?

That way you'll know if it's gonna break down.

Just make sure you make them sign a delivery receipt stating date and time, in case of a speeding ticket.

Also, you said they put the car through an mot without you knowing.

Why would they do that?

What did it fail on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

once the engine was replaced they returned the car on the back of a flatbed,

a few days later collected the car to fix the body damage,

 

apparently the delivery guy drove it onto the flatbed and hit the underside of the front bumper on the ramp and snapped the headlight mounting,

as well as misaligning the grill (nose) from the bonnet so much so that the bonnet would not close.

 

after the nose was realigned,

nothing else was fixed,

they took it upon themselves to send it in for the MOT which failed.

I don't understand why the MOT check was done as there was only body work done.

 

MOT failed on rear Brakes and falls under the new rules as dangerous and cannot be driven before it is fixed.

When they replaced the engine they replaced a 1 inch piece of wire on the fan and charged me £100 claiming the fan was the cause of my engine failure in the first place,

 

I know my engine failed due to timing chain, AA diagnosed.

So I am a bit reluctant to pay them for brake repairs and recheck of MOT.

I have looked up this garage and found a number of bad reviews on Honesjohn and AA forums, unfortunately I didn't find these before I sent my car in.

 

https://www.honestjohn.co.uk/forum/post/index.htm?t=85360

Link to post
Share on other sites

consumer rights act.

send him a letter demanding what you want to happen

give him 14 days

then issue a letter [court] before action.

 

how do you pay paypal.?

 

Thanks, is there a template available which tells them they have failed to compy with the consumes act and the LBA, thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...