Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Just out of curiosity aesmith - are you a lawyer?
    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver I could initiate a claim. Or much quicker  - the other entity - with a charge already - could use that to make an application for an order for sale.
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nationwide freeze account***Resolved***


Crawford2018
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2046 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, this is my first post and I will try and get to the point and keep it as brief as I can and get to the point as there is a LOT of detail regarding my problem.

 

My names stephen and I opened a bank account with nationwide about a year ago and hardly ever really used it other than to pay for my mortgage and some other DD’s.

 

On the 22nd of June I sold my car via eBay and received payment for it through PayPal (as PayPal is safe) .

I received the funds for the vehicle which was £18000.

PayPal sent me an email and explained the payment was on hold for 24 hours for security purposes and told me not to release the car.

That was fine,

 

24 hours passed and I then received an email from PayPal to say that the funds had cleared and I was able to release the item (car).

I contacted the buyer and they then picked the vehicle up to which they did.

 

I then proceeded to withdraw the funds from my PayPal to my bank to which again I received an email from PayPal to say that it could take upto 72 hours for further security checks. That was great.

 

On the 25 of June 2018 I received an email from PayPal to say the funds had been withdrawn to my bank account (nationwide).

as you would do I checked my account and it was there.

it was time to then withdraw the funds and buy a newer car.........

 

I phoned the bank on the 25th of June 2018 to book in advance to go in and make the withdrawal, it was all fine

then all of a sudden the lady told me on the phone that my account was frozen as of today!

 

Baffled and unaware why I asked her for a reason as to why?

She then told me I would need to contact the “fraud department”.

 

I did this and spoke to an advisor and he was asking where the money came from etc blah blah blah.

I explained everything to him.

He asked for proof of the transaction.

I emailed him emails between myself and PayPal, transaction ID’s, the eBay ad and everything else I could possibly give him.

 

5 working days then had passed and I was told he couldn’t allow me to transact u till he had the “ok” from another department so that was fine.

 

To cut a very long story short, literally hours and hours of phone calls to the fraud department, nationwide complaints department and I also have a claim the FOS.

 

It has now been 65 days since the account was frozen,

I still get the same answer from the bank of I phone

“we have not yet made a decision and we will contact you when we do”

if you question who’s making the decision or why it’s taking so long you are met with

“nationwide are meeting the statutory and legal obligations and can’t allow for you to transact at this point”

 

The lady at the FOS has received the case file from the bank and she then asked me last week if I could send her all the emails from PayPal, transaction ID’s and listing etc which I then done, although I had already sent this to the bank weeks ago......which should have been on the case file?

 

I have done a LOT of research and from what I can see is the bank submit a SAR suspicious activity report the the NCA national crime agency.

They then have 7 working days to reply to the bank to give them authorisation to complete the transaction.

If they do not then you enter a monotorium period which then lasts for a 31 calendar days for the NCA to investigate.

 

This money is not fraudulent, the money is legitimate, I simply sold a car, received the money via PayPal and withdrew it to my bank.

What have I done wrong? I can not find any other story the same as mines or that has taken as long!

 

No one wants to tell me anything and no ones I’m any hurry!

The bank did not even notify me that they had stopped my mortgage payments and other DD’s.

 

What is going on? I feel as though I’m being investigated for legitimate money through the genuine sale of a car. It has left me without a car for the past 65 days.

 

I can’t afford to goto a lawyer hence why I went to the FOS.

But they are in no grey hurry.

The FOS keep telling me that thierselves and the bank are working closely and as quickly as possible to resolve it.

 

What I can’t get my head around is

1. Resolve what

2. What on earth can take this long?

 

I can’t show or prove to them anymore than I have about the sale, nothing going to change whether it be 65 days or 6500 days.

It’s still going to be the same sale, same transaction and same proof

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

You may find that if you do go MCOL - then the judge may side with Nationwide over you. This is due to Money Laundering laws. Sure - You know the full whereabouts of the money from the point of Paypal etc but they don't and to receive a large amount like that may trigger a flag for AMLL.

If you have all the proof then this is a no brainer. However send an email to NW CEO [email protected]

 

See if it triggers a response and if it doesnt or its insufficient - Then start a claim for money etc.

Although due to the amount you'd be claiming if you wanted the £18k from NW then you may be looking at a claim in the Fast Track

 

Fast Track is reserved for claims between £10,000-£25,000. The hearing can only last for 1 day, and usually, it takes up to a year to reach it.

 

But I do wonder if a judge could force a release of the money as part of the a decision if required proof was given?? (This might need a bit of investigating)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wouldn't claim for the initial money..that is not in question...its the losses uncured so would be Small Claims Track.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

Thankyou for the replies. I had already emailed the CEO and received a failed message email so I done some digging and found another email which was CEO at nationwide.co.uk. I did receive a reply from that on stating.

 

Dear Mr …..

 

Thank you for your email. We are sorry to learn of your concerns, a response will be issued by an appropriate senior manager very shortly. In order that we may arrange this, would you please be so kind as to let me have the following information:

 

Full address and postcode (in order that we may record your concerns)

Preferred contact telephone number/s

Date of Birth

 

please remember that email is not 100% secure, so if you prefer you can telephone us on 0800 5453003, between the hours of 9.00am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, to provide further contact details.

 

Kind regards

 

That was 2 days ago now.

The FOS emailed me today also,

I had also spoken with them on the phone 2 days ago.

 

She is telling me that she requested information from the bank (didn’t tell me what) and she needs that before she can make a decision.

 

However I explained to her yesterday that surely the bank are dragging this out for longer than needed etc and she agreed with me.

 

She also told me that she CAN go ahead and make a decision on the case without that information she has requested and in my favour but they don’t like to do that? Anyways she emailed me today to say this......

 

Dear Mr

 

I’m just sending an email to update you as promised during our call earlier this week.

 

I have taken the decision to escalate the requests to Nationwide to a manager here.

 

I’m hoping that we will have an answer from them early next week, and as soon as I have more information I’ll give you a call.

 

Kind regards

 

So I’m hoping now that it’s been escalated then maybe this is them now pushing the bank?

She has already said to me that her manager is now involved in this and they are very keen to have it resolved quickly.

 

Sorry for my ignorance but what is MCOL? I Thankyou all for your replies and it is greatly appreciated.

 

Stephen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Money Claim Online...its where you would issue a court claim.

 

https://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk/web/mcol/welcome

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not advisable to start a claim until the Nationnwide/FOS have concluded....and hopefully to your satisfaction.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if from past experience etc or knowledge that if the case handler from the FOS has now escalated the claim to their manager does this mean the FOS is now in a position to really be wanting to be making a decision quickly or.......is this a long drawn process and could still take ages?

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean by Manager?

 

there are adjudicators they initially make a decision and then theres the ombudsman themselves if you don't agree with the ADJ decision.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received an email from the lady who’s dealing with my case.

I’ll copy and paste her email she sent me on Friday.

 

Dear Mr *****

 

I’m just sending an email to update you as promised during our call earlier this week.

 

I have taken the decision to escalate the requests to Nationwide to a manager here.

I’m hoping that we will have an answer from them early next week, and as soon as I have more information I’ll give you a call.

 

Kind regards

 

Meg Raymond | investigator | 020 3487 6372

 

Financial Ombudsman Service | Exchange Tower, London, E14 9SR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going up the chain of cmd

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I’m failing to understand is that the case handler said to me that they are able to make a decision based on the information that’s already been given by the bank.

 

They requested more information from the bank weeks ago and the bank have failed to supply it.

 

The reason the ombudsman is there is to make sure that the bank are not taking longer than needed. This being said if the bank are not replying to the ombudsman within a timely manner or giving them what they need to make a decision then surely rather than “pass it up thto chain of command”

 

surely they must saying “ok we have given you 3 months to reply to us, you have failed to do that so we have no option but to go in the customers favour given the limited information you have already given”.

 

Not passing it up the chain of command to then be fobbed off for even longer, if the bank have not replied to the case handler then I’m doubting the bank is going to reply to a manager.........

Link to post
Share on other sites

So depending on where you lie in the complaints process in the FOS depends on how you will get on with your decision.

If you are with an adjudicator then when they make a decision it is not legally binding. The bank can ignore it but it is risky to do so.

 

The real clincher is when it gets handed up to an Ombudsman. When the Ombudsman rules, the consumer has the right to accept or reject but the Bank doesnt. Any decision made is is legally binding and has what would be considered the same power as a judge when it is finalised. It means you would not beable to take further action in a court unless;

 

- The Bank do not comply with the decision made by the Ombudsman after you have accepted.

 

Please remember that AMLL take precedence over anything to do with complaining. But there are times when a bank will get it wrong and quite often they do. You should be compensated accordingly for loss of access to the money and the account being frozen.

What i would say. Is that if this was your main account - and they froze the WHOLE thing and not just took away the money while they investigated then they should be slapped on the wrists for it.

 

What stage are you at with the Ombudsman? Nationwide will say they did nothing wrong and were obeying the law, but from what ive read - They should have handled the situation sooooooooooooooo much better.

 

If you have emailed the CEO like i may have mentioned before and it got given to an Exec Complaints Handler then make sure that both the FOS and Exec CH are talking to each other.

If it comes to it - You may be waiting longer if it goes to an Ombudsman. However if you do take legal action against Nationwide for whatever reason - this will derail your situation with the FOS.

 

The lesson here for AMLL is that for reasons beyond you or I - If under suspicion then under AMLL its very difficult to get information.

Dont let it eat you up. Just concentrate on getting your end result and do it the right way.

 

(Also if it comes to it - Im sure a few newspapers might be interested)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all Thankyou for taking the time to reply back to me. Iv not heard from FOS today so I decided to phone the bank out of the blue on the off chance. I was greeted with good news.

 

They decided YESTERDAY that they were releasing the funds and issued a cheque yesterday. However they have decided to close my account.

 

Am I able to claim compensation from them?

I mean that’s the last of my concerns but I’m ecstatic that they have finally released the funds.

 

What I’m confused about is why didn’t the bank phone me yesterday to tell me this and why issue a cheque? Why not give me the option to take the money or transfer it to another account?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done thread title updated.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all Thankyou for taking the time to reply back to me. Iv not heard from FOS today so I decided to phone the bank out of the blue on the off chance. I was greeted with good news.

 

They decided YESTERDAY that they were releasing the funds and issued a cheque yesterday. However they have decided to close my account. Am I able to claim compensation from them? I mean that’s the last of my concerns but I’m ecstatic that they have finally released the funds. What I’m confused about is why didn’t the bank phone me yesterday to tell me this and why issue a cheque? Why not give me the option to take the money or transfer it to another account?

 

Well done - But id read up about CIFAS if they are closing the account...! (They are probably closing the account on the basis that you the relationship has broken down which it had) However - Id read up on CIFAS just incase...

Get the ombudsman to confirm that you will NOT be added to any CIFAS database.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and ask about compo too

nothing to stop you going after them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...