a reminder with a threat that they will next add a mystery amount for their admin charges.

This is again unlawful as they are relying on creating a keeper liability but they all do it all of ther time.

It is like the chareg average went up from a normal £60-80 to a flat £100.

Why? that is the maximum they know they will get away with before people start to actually research whether it is a lawful charge in the first place.

If they made it £200 no-one would pay up without a fight.

Had a new demand today

DR+.pdf

7Mb for one page...reduced to<.2mb>

ignore

did you action post 23?

why is a well known Hollywood actress moonlighting for a low life dca? I think we should be told. Still, better tha using a misspelt name form Madmen on legal documents

7Mb for one page...reduced to<.2mb>

ignore

 

did you action post 23?

This is the service road for the shopping centre

But its still being ticketed by a ppc not the council by a penalty charge notice...get it yet??

I am grateful for any help received on this site but you seem to be a bit spiky and not very helpful at all,

perhaps you should tone down your attitude and try to be a bit more helpful.

We are not all experts and sometimes find the terminology and abbreviations you use not helpful.

I have read multiple posts on these subjects and see very few if any that have a positive outcome.

not spikey in the least..doesn't matter to us at all ...you're the one with the invoice, but certain things just don't appear to be sinking in..

.you are either not bothering to research here or you failing to understand the very basics of these PPC speculative invoices.

its no good us keep explaining as eric and others have done already here on your thread if its not making the penny drop.

who owns the land whereby you got ticketed?

I am grateful for any help received on this site but you seem to be a bit spiky and not very helpful at all,

perhaps you should tone down your attitude and try to be a bit more helpful.

 

We are not all experts and sometimes find the terminology and abbreviations you use not helpful.

I have read multiple posts on these subjects and see very few if any that have a positive outcome.

There's a forum sticky with a list of abbreviations, here's a link.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?168275-Posting-in-this-Forum-and-A-Z-of-Motoring-Terms

HB

no positive outcome?

I have been posting on here for some 6 years and in that time the parking co's have won about half a dozen of the claims that were defended as suggested.

Out of those it would be fair to say that the ones lost were a little disturbing regarding the judge's decisions and even Then the parking co didnt get what they were claiming in 3 of them because of their (well known abuse of) creative accounting.

It may be small beer in the overall parking rip off scheme of things but it is also a couple of hundred people who wont be afraid of fighting back when they get the next one and we dont get to hear about that very often.

I have had a couple of demands since my last court case in 2015 and needless to say batted them off without much ado.

That might have been a bit tougher for someone else who hadn't read up on things in general and specific points that enabled me to not accept the first answer I was given when getting a well known supermarket chain to cancel on my behalf.

Can't see any mention of parking fees in the original notice, Have now received a letter before court action

Decision notice.pdf

you need to find the result of point 16

it will be in that document

if you have a LBA you need to reply to the sols in the std insulting manner on many threads here

who's the paper sols they are using?

Got the solicitors letter

pcn2.pdf

not an LBA so ignore

thank you

another threatogram from the owners of the IPC. expect a lba from the same in about a month. you will respond to that but post it up here first so we can determine if they have got that right or not.

Open

Any update here?