Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

17 year old.... agreement to purchase vehicle from auction


England2018
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2058 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am posting this as I require some urgent advice regarding a minor and an agreement. I am 17 years old and I got onto an online car auction and won. The vehicle is for £7,900 + VAT + 20% commission + vat, therefore the total plaice is around £11,300. However I don’t have the money to buy the car and I did not think that I will win the auction. I contacted the auctioneer about this and they said that in there terms and condition (which I agreed to over email) they clearly state the following: 1) if a buyer wants to cancel they must pay the 20% commission+ vat. Which works out at £1580+ Vat

2) it is a trade sale so consumer right do not apply

3) there is a 2% interest each day for late payment

4) if an under 18 bids in a vehicle the parent or legal guardian is liable to pay.

5) is payment is not received within the allotted time they will use legal action.

6) If the reserve price is not met the seller may still sell the vehicle to the highest bidder.

 

I need to cancel the bid as I have not got the money to purchase the vehicle but I don’t even have the enough money to pay for the cancellation charge. The auctioneer have got a copy of my driving licence and are saying that I have till 5pm otherwise they will go to court and most likely I will get a CCJ in my name which will be for the full amount of approx £11,300 plus 2% interest each day.

 

I would like to know if they will still be able to take me to court even if I am under the age of 18 and classed as a minor, and I did not think this would happen. My parents are not aware of the situation and even they do not have that hind of money. Adobe is greatly appreciated. Thanks

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many people are going to wonder why you bid for a vehicle you cannot pay for, and why you think the auctioneer should be out of pocket because of your actions.

 

That said, you cannot be taken to court until you are 18, and as your parents were not involved in any way, they cannot be sued directly either. As they could not have know about condition no 4, it's an unfair term and is unlikely to be enforceable.

 

I doubt a vehicle this expensive would be considered 'necessary' so I don't think you have formed a valid contract, however the auctioneer is not likely to just forget about this. At the very least you are going to be involved in a long battle.

 

I suggest you inform your parents immediately.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was an irresponsible thing to do yes but we were all 17 at one time in our life .

 

The auctioneers can threaten all they want but I feel their contract is too one sided in their favour to be acceptable in a Court should it ever get that far. For example all they will do is put the car back in the next auction and I imagine it will get something similar to the price that they accepted from you. So their loss cannot be anywhere like the £11,300 they are claiming from you.

 

You have to tell your parents today really, to help them get out the mess you are in. It won't be easy for you. Then write [not phone-you need a paper trail just in case it goes to Court] and insist that you have to cancel, that you do not have that kind of money and your parents knew nothing of the transaction and would not have guaranteed it had they known. And the Auctioneers knew that you were under age at the time.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say the auctioneer has a copy of your driving licence. Presumably you sent it to them. Did you send it before you bid? If not, when in the bidding process? This matters because if the auctioneers accepted a bid from you knowing you were a minor they are on very weak ground in claiming any right to enforce the alleged contract.

 

 

I doubt this is enforceable against you nor against your parents (if they neither knew about nor authorised your bid) but that won't stop the auctioneers putting pressure on you, eg sending debt collectors round to your house. That could happen. People will tell you, correctly, that debt collectors have no powers in a situation like this and you can ignore them. But I think that's expecting a lot of you, a 17 year old, and in any case it's your parents who will probably open the door to them if it happens.

 

 

If I were your parents I'd get advice from Citizen's Advice to confirm the views being given here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for your prompt reply, I understand I will have to tell my parents today. The auctioneers are insisting that my age doesn’t not matter and that’s as I am over the age of 16 I am liable. I understand it was a bit of a stupid thing for me to do and I don’t know why I did it. I’m going into second year of college and am really stressed about what is going to happen. They are saying they will go to court and get CCJ in my name and baliffs will be involved. I send the driving licence before the bid, they needed to confirm my name and address in order to create an account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I send the driving licence before the bid, they needed to confirm my name and address in order to create an account.

 

That's an important point England2018 because it means the auctioneers knew you were a minor before you bid and that therefore you were not legally able to enter into a valid contract to buy a car at auction. They accepted your bid at their own risk. As you've already discovered form your own researches, confirmed here, being aged 16 is completely irrelevant, they're just talking BS to hassle you.

 

Personally I think they are bluffing in the hope they can unnerve you enough to pay up. I'm sure they know they couldn't bring a claim in court.

 

I don't know how much your parents know about contract law or how confident they are about dealing with it themselves, but unless they are confident I recommend they talk to Citizen's Advice. If I were replying I would certainly be including that they knew you were a minor and were negligent in allowing you to open an account and then allowing you to bid.

 

 

In the meantime do not have any further emails or discussions with them. Wait until you have had advice from Citizen's Advice and then keep all contact with them in writing and sent by post Recorded Delivery. Do not talk to them by phone - that leaves no evidence trail and allows arguments about who said what. Post Recorded Delivery ('Signed For') creates an evidence trail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under 18’s can enter into enforceable contracts, for “necessaries”.

A car can be a necessary.

 

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/can-a-minor-enter-into-a-contract-34024

Oops : that is a US site

 

https://www.gillhams.com/site/library/legal_articles/minors_and_contractual_agreements.html

Is for the UK

 

What was the car for? Pleasure? Getting to work??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under 18’s can enter into enforceable contracts, for “necessaries”.

A car can be a necessary.

 

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/can-a-minor-enter-into-a-contract-34024

 

 

Although it's not impossible for a court to decide a car is a "necessary" - it's very unlikely - that website provides no useful advice one way or another about what an English court might decide as it's a US website discussing US law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contracts can still be entered into with "minors", although if I remember correctly terms which disadvantage the minor are most likely to be held as being unenforceable and more likely to go in the favor of the minor.

 

Not sure why you'd bid to buy a vehicle with no intention of buying, as someone who goes to auction a lot, it's generally a well oiled operation in regards to selling cars, so I can understand why auction companies would seek these charges from you, although essentially as the vehicle isn't being sold, then I'd imagine they'll have a tough time getting that 20% commission, especially when they'll make the 20% commission upon successfully selling the vehicle, so they'd be profiting twice from one transaction.

 

As for your parents being held liable, that is a legal nonsense, if they have no knowledge of any such agreement or have entered into and accepted any such terms, then no such clause would be enforceable in court.

 

I do feel that you would be liable for the costs in selling the vehicle, which in terms of cost, would probably be something like £100 or less.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although it's not impossible for a court to decide a car is a "necessary" - it's very unlikely - that website provides no useful advice one way or another about what an English court might decide as it's a US website discussing US law.

 

And I’d edited my post to reflect that, and cited a site commenting on E&W law...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your advice.

 

The actually payment was to yesterday at 5pm.

At 6pm they send me an email along the lines of “since payment has not been made in the allotted time, a new invoice as been sent which has incurred a 2% charge”

they then attached a link to an online invoice which I had clicked.

 

Once I opened the invoice they sent me another email which said “thank you for opening your invoice” . Therefore the totals bill now is around £11,600.

 

I will speak to my parents about going to citizens advice with me.

I don’t know why I put in the bid however I don’t think I would win as “the reserve price” had not been met, but there was a condition which stated that even if it had not been met the vehicle MAY still be sold to the highest bidder.

 

Please could you advise me on are debt collectors allowed to come without going to court first, also are they allowed to take my parents car and other household items.

 

Also i have read online (form other forums) that I should tell them as I was a minor the contract is void and I no longer accept the terms of conditions.

But others have said that I should make no contact.

 

Should I tell them this or should I make no contact.

Thank you all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

England2018, when you posted at lunchtime today you didn't say you had already paid them something. It makes it difficult to advise you when we don't know the full story. What did you pay them? Whose money was it - yours or your parents? Do your parents know yet? Is there anything else we should know?

 

Stop having anything to do with them. There is a risk that you will make a contract valid that would otherwise have been invalid. Tell your parents and get advice either from a solicitor or Citizen's Advice [EDIT] or a Law Centre (thanks Mr P).

 

Debt collectors have no legal powers and cannot take your or your parents property. Only if a court has considered the claim and issued a judgement against you could someone seize property (and then they are a bailiff, not a debt collector). But debt collectors will turn up anyway and try and make you think they have powers that they don't and harass and bully you on the doorstep. You are 17, that shouldn't happen to you and you shouldn't be expected to deal with it. Stop trying to deal with this by yourself!

 

When are you 18 (not specific date, just the month)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know how much your parents know about contract law or how confident they are about dealing with it themselves, but unless they are confident I recommend they talk to Citizen's Advice.

 

I must admit, last time I had reason to consult with CAB, I was very disappointed with the quality of their advice. Perhaps some offices are better than others.

With that in mind, I'd recommend contacting a local community law centre. These are often staffed by qualified lawyers and have access to legal advice in a wide range of areas. To see if there is one locally, see: http://www.lawcentres.org.uk/

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if I didn’t make myself clear, I haven’t paid them anything I meant to say that the payment deadline was yesterday and that after the deadline they send me another invoice which has incurred the 2% penalty.

 

I am telling my parents about the situation and will hopefully get advice on Monday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if I didn’t make myself clear, I haven’t paid them anything I meant to say that the payment deadline was yesterday and that after the deadline they send me another invoice which has incurred the 2% penalty.

 

I am telling my parents about the situation and will hopefully get advice on Monday.

 

OK, I read it that you had paid them. Let us know what happens. In the meantime have nothing to do with them.

 

And I'll ask again, when are you 18 (month)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am 18 in October

 

As I am under 18 would it be legal for them to pass my details such as name and address on to a debt collection agency.

 

Just in case i have not made it clear the vehicle was auctioned online.

 

Also if anybody would like to read the terms and confirms which are online, I can send you a link if you tell me how to,

 

I don’t want to post their name or any of their details as I don’t want anything to go against me. Thank you all again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget the DCA totally powerless

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am 18 in October

 

The reason I asked that is because if after you are 18 you "ratify" a contract you entered into as a minor then it becomes binding on you and you could be sued to enforce it in a court. I hope this is all resolved before October but if it isn't be very careful indeed what you do from the day of your 18th birthday. Then you would no longer be able to claim the contract was void because you were a minor. Even minor things, things you think are trivial, could be held by a court to be ratification of the contract. So do not engage in any discussion/correspondence with these people without professional advice.

 

 

Could they pass your details to a debt collection agency? Probably. I can't think of a reason why they couldn't, someone else here might know about that. Best to assume they could.

 

 

Don't post anything that could identify you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, as expected they were not happy, they told me it was an immature thing to do. They explained to me the affect a CCJ would have in the future when I try to get a mortgage or try to get a loan. We also discussed 2 options which we need to get advice on (maybe from CAB).

1) write to them and offer to pay the cost to put the car back in auction (which I believe is £55).

2) ignore until we get a letter from a court, then explain to court I was a minor and my parents were not aware of my actions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just reading the T&Cs again and it says if an under 18 was to bid the parents will be liable to pay, and so court proceedings will be issued in their name. Could this still happen even if they did not know I was bidding?, how would they get my parents name and other details necessary to got to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just reading the T&Cs again and it says if an under 18 was to bid the parents will be liable to pay, and so court proceedings will be issued in their name. Could this still happen even if they did not know I was bidding?, how would they get my parents name and other details necessary to got to court.

 

Quite......think about it logically :wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...