Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Could you link us to BankFodder's post please? The judge's office means something different to me. HB
    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2030 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have received a letter from Zurich saying they have mis calculated my payments since 2004.

 

Giving me two options a refund + interest or keep paying what I am and increase cover

 

Can anyone send me link to interest calculator please had it on my old computer which is long gone.

 

Smiles

 

OSW

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanking you kindly ...

 

Just did figures based on 8% however just re read the letter they sent me and it states interest will be paid at a rate BOE rate less 0.35% until Jan 2012 and less 0.4% thereafter ???

 

 

How does this work then I thought it was 8% across the board???

Link to post
Share on other sites

they've deprived you of your money

just like PPI they should give you 8% IMHO.

that's the FOS rules

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

incidentally they should be refunding the 8% on EACH OVERPAYMENT INDIVIDUALLY from its own date too

have you a list or can you work out and fill that sheet in like you did for the PPI? for each date of each over payment?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought this was the case =- love how these people make up their own rules the notice of the amount of interest they are going to pay is in SMALL print.

 

How many people will just fill this in and send it off

 

So how do I proceed? do I contact FOS or send it back crossed through denoting 8% should be applied? Or both

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cant go to the FOS until you exhaust their complaints process or 8 weeks from complaint

I cant see their being anyharm in ringing the fos Tuesday and asking mind?

 

why not adapt what ive said in post 5 and inc that in the reply to zenith with a refusal

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they've deprived you of your money

just like PPI they should give you 8% IMHO.

that's the FOS rules

 

This post yes?

 

And don't understand this bit ..... and inc that in the reply to zenith with a refusal - Oh reply to Zurich Saying I refuse the interest rate they denote ? Because of above?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

inc this bit too

 

they should be refunding the 8% on EACH overpayment INDIVIDUALLY from its own date when you made the over payment

have you a list or can you work out and fill that sheet in like you did for the PPIi? for each date of each over payment?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also when I fill in the spreadsheet total charges read £881.85 and in their letter it says charges = £871.74

Miss calculation somewhere given they have over charged my by £5.01 every month since 03/04 then I am inclined to trust the spreadsheet.

 

According to spreadsheet

charges £881.75 interest £778.24

 

Total £1660.09

Link to post
Share on other sites

and you entered each £5.01 individually on each date you paid it in?

 

if so sent that to them too!!

 

well done

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes indeed DX

 

I'm sure you realize what I'm like if I don't do things straight away it may take me years to do them :lol:

 

In say that I have an encyclopedia at the front door response from SAR request to egg I will open that soon "honestly I will"

 

On further reading it also infers my policy will end in 2021 (review) however my policy runs till I'm 56 so they are cutting short policy by 5 years, may be reading that wrong

 

DX .... Is this OK?

 

Further to your letter dated 21st August 2018, notifying us that you have overcharged us since 2004.

 

During this time, you have deprived us of our money which has added to financial hardship, under FOS rules the interest that should be refunded should be at a rate of 8% for each individual overpayment from the date that it was charged.

 

We are attaching a breakdown of charges and interest applicable to the same at a rate of 8% for your ease.

 

We decline your interest rate and request that you recalculate your figures to reflect the correct amount of interest that has been accrued over the period that you have been over charging us,

 

I rechecked spreadsheet and had duplicated 2 months entries now much nearer the figure they stated :lol:

 

I now have £871.83 the have £871.74

Link to post
Share on other sites

wouldn't put financial hardship.

 

the FOS clearly state ...statutory interest at 8% ...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

yes that what the staint does and all you are entitled too..

you paid no extra int as it wasn't a loan..

 

you seem to getting comfused..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

DX

 

Yes confused that seems to be a recurring event with me lately.

 

All sorted now 8% to be paid - however I dread to think how many people got the original letter and signed it not realizing the interest rate was not applied correctly and lost money because of this

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...