Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AS parking windscreen PCN - stopped for 10mins - Failure to pay and display - Bluff Inn Car Park, Hayle Cornwall


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1976 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone.

 

I'm seeking guidance on an invoice attached to my windscreen on 13/08/2018.

 

I failed to display so ended up coming here for that mistake.

 

I have not made any contact and I have already filled in the following.

 

1 The date of infringement? 13/08/2018

 

2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] No

 

If you haven't appealed yet - ,.........

 

have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days]

what date is on it

Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? No NTK received yet

 

3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?]

 

4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK,

did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process?

[it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances]

 

5 Who is the parking company? AS PARKING LTD

 

6. where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? BLUFF INN, Hayle, Cornwall

PCN1_P&D6.compressed.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

so I like the bit where their operator has said that they were hanging around for 5 mins but have failed to say what time of day that was and have missed the point entirely regarding a 10 minute grace period!

 

However, as they are IPC members the law of theland doesnt apply to them as Will and John who own the IPC and Gladstones sols have superpowers and will win the day for them regradless (not).

 

Now,

is this a pub car park as suggested

or is it a P&D where the public are invited to clog up someones land to the detriment?

Were you on holiday there or is it local to you.

 

If the latter then some pictures of the entrance to the land and of their signage would be most useful.

 

AS are very parochial having a number of sites in Cornwall but the owner never ventures far from home so if you live miles away he wouldnt attend a court session and that may to your advantage.

 

Dont respond to the ticket but wait for them to send the NTK and post that up here so we can advise on its ability to create a liability under the POFA.

 

many companies get it so wrong that they actually do away with their chances of claiming from the driver, let alone the keeper

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

The time is stated on the PCN but I edited out this time and typed in 5 minutes as I was not sure if posting a specific time would identify the notice (my appologies, I should have typed in a different colour/typeface).

 

 

I was on holiday there, and I live roughly 300 miles away in the midlands, so around a 5 hour drive with good traffic.

 

This is a P&D car park at the Bluff Inn.

I can google a generic picture and confirm the signs are the same, The sign to the entrance is the 5th and 6th picture in the posted PDF and it is between 2 gaps in a wall that are both entrances and exit with no posted direction of travel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So no concessions for their faulty equipment?

Well that is an unfair contract, if you paid the money and didnt get a ticket they have failed to perform to the contract and cant enforce it and you dont have to go elsewhere.

 

that would be enough to void the whole contract under S 62 of the Consumer Rights Act.

 

As an aside their signs are all different so could be considered confusing

I note that they all carry the same clauses but the sign at the entrance doesnt carry the core terms of the contract so is an "invitation to treat" and that means that a contract ONLY accepted when you feed the meter having accepted the terms.

 

That doesnt prevent you parking and not accepting the terms, you are then trespassing and would have to leave if you were asked to but AS or the pub landlord didnt ask you to do that.

 

ultimately the vehicle was not observed at 2 times that were more than 10 minutes apart so AS dont know if you had gone into the pub to ask for change (perfectly acceptable reason for being there as part of the grace period)

 

Now AS arent going to let these inconveniences of the law being your friend stand in the way of making a few quid so even if you write to them to tell them they are wrong they wont take any notice.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for the information.

 

 

Up to them if they take no notice, Hopefully if I need to eventually write to them, I have no issues whatsoever with letting them know there will be a full defence in court!

 

As for now, I await the NTK.

Edited by weallstandtogether
Link to post
Share on other sites

I just had a look at AS Parking appeals.

Question and answer 3 surprised me a bit.

 

Q. “I was getting change to buy a ticket, will you cancel the charge?”

A. There is no period of free parking, motorists are required to have sufficient change with them BEFORE arrival; appeals submitted on this basis will not be granted under any circumstances.

 

It's a little funny and unbelieveable to me that they can mislead this way but I can see it can be quite offputting to someone who's thining about appealing.

 

I believe some of the information on the appeals page of their site is complete Tripe!

If not all.

 

If this is cornwall and one company, I can't imagine what the others like for the rest of the country

.

Are they all as bad as each other I wonder?

Link to post
Share on other sites

simple ans is yes!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they allowed successful appeal they wouldnt get any money so they invent things that arent true so they cant pull the wool over people's eyes.

 

you already know about the grace period and the fact that they didn't observe your vehicle at 2 times more than 10 mins apart but as they are IPC members the law doesnt apply because Will and John who own that entity have superpowers that entitle them to say anying they want with impunity.

 

Funny that the courts dont agree with that though, they tend to apply the law as it is and then the parking co's foot the bill because they listened to a pair of snake oil salesmen when deciding which ATA to join.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Just looked at the IPC code of practice and they state that a 'reasonable' time be allowed before issuing a ticket but they don't specify any amount of minutes. Obviously that doesn't bother the IPC as they will ignore their own guidance and reject your appeal.

 

 

I would do nothing and only react if a Letter Before Claim/Action arrives

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also just checked on the IPC operators code of practice it does give a time of 10 minutes for leaving - and a

"sufficient amount of time to park and read any signs so they may make an informed decision as to whether or not to remain on the site"

.... surely this would take 10 minutes minimum if not longer, - this must take longer than to simply exit the car park after paying for which they allow 10 minutes!

 

 

 

IPC code of practice states:

 

15. Grace Periods

 

15.1 Drivers should be allowed a sufficient amount of time to park and read any signs so they may make an informed decision as to whether or not to remain on the site.

 

15.2 Drivers must be allowed a minimum period of 10 minutes to leave a site after a pre-paid or permitted period of parking has expired.

 

15.3 The reference to 10 minutes in 15.2 above shall not apply where the period of pre-paid or permi ed parking does not exceed 1 hour providing that the signage on the site makes it clear to the motorist, in a prominent font, that no grace period applies on that land.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

So here it is. The NTK. Just what I've been waiting for. Arrived Saturday but only just got round to scanning and editing.

Something happened to the images when scanning and editing so the as parking logo fails to display properly but the information in the document is intact.

AS PARKING.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if they would accept 100 euros as payment?

 

 

also amount aoutstanding shows as ei 00.00 so nothing to pay. Look at the 1 in the euro amount, it has a serif on it as ones do. The outstanding amount clearly doesnt so is an i.

 

 

What to do? sit on this until the 8th Oct as ling as they dont resend the NTK and you are home and dry as you will have paid the invoiced amount, namely zero. An honest demand at last!

 

 

Another alternative is to ask your bank for a euro cheque and send it mkde out for nothing, keeping a copy for your records. You will then be able to show the invoice paid in full and if they alter the cheque then you have reasosn to report them to the police for fraud.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if they would accept 100 euros as payment?

also amount aoutstanding shows as ei 00.00 so nothing to pay. Look at the 1 in the euro amount, it has a serif on it as ones do. The outstanding amount clearly doesnt so is an i.

What to do? sit on this until the 8th Oct as ling as they dont resend the NTK and you are home and dry as you will have paid the invoiced amount, namely zero. An honest demand at last!

Another alternative is to ask your bank for a euro cheque and send it mkde out for nothing, keeping a copy for your records. You will then be able to show the invoice paid in full and if they alter the cheque then you have reasosn to report them to the police for fraud.

Let me get back to you on this. The ntk does have it as a £ sign but this data changed when editing. Let me do it again and see if I can better it. Alternatively I can pm you the original unedited scan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may have accidentally used OCR when scanning the forms. This does not detract from the fact that you stayed for 5 minutes and 31 seconds, well below the 10 minute grace period that the IPC code of practice states so I would do nothing and let them shoot themselves if they decide on court action.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats better. Lesson for all of us.

 

You still have a weapon to use, namely contacting the inn and asking them to get AS to drop the matter.

 

Dont use email, try telephone first and invite them to instruct AS to cancel charge No xxxxxxx or write a letter stating that as the keeper of vehicle (reg) you got a letter demanding the money and this is inbreach of the trade association rules and it reflects badly on their business that they employ people who are happy to engage in such fraud and it will drag them down into disrepute etc.

 

If they dont then you put a factual review on the various sites like tripadvisor to warn others they employ a buch of bandits to tax the unwary potential customers.

Only after that should you consider other options.

 

also, from the little I can see on google spyonyourneighbour the signage is absolute pants.

2 signs at the entrance neither of them saying anything about a charge for being there.

The writing on the one that doesnt say P no hgv's is too small to read so hard to consider it at all when driving past it.

 

As there appears to be a ticket machine then that means the blurb on that is the arbiter of what is a contract but if you didnt feed it you didnt agree to be bound by it anyway so just a trespasser and that is nowt to do with AS

Edited by dx100uk
merge spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have yesterday received another letter thats to be treated as a final warning to pay before recovery steps.

 

I did try to contact the bluff but there is no answer to the phone and there doesn't seem to be an e-mail address for them to ask if they are open.

 

I have tried contacting the Haven holiday site that the Bluff inn Belongs to but they are closed until March 2019 so I can only assume the pub is too.

 

I have not tried calling on what would be thought of as busy nights though Fri/Sat.

 

So I assume I am still not to respond to AS Parking yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

until or unless you get a letter of/before claim from a fake/tame paper only solicitor you ignore everything

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...