Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”. The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses."    
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
    • We both sent our completed N181 form to the court and claimants solicitors. We haven't received anything from the solicitors yet but perhaps we will today. How are directions agreed ? Does the claimant file proposed directions with their Directions Questionnaire ? I will update once anything is received from the solicitors.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

fucha1981 vs BOS


fucha1981
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6355 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I've just happened upon this website while I've been mulling over what to do next regarding my bank charges claim. I sent off a claim to the Bank of Scotland on the 23rd of September using them template from the Money Saving Expert website claiming for all my bank charges and interest due to being overdrawn (I had all my statements so i didn't need to ask them to send them out);

 

"Dear Sir/Madam,

 

 

 

 

I understand that the charges applied to my account in relation to the following table, are unlawful.

 

 

     

     

     

    When I opened my account I entered into a contract with you, at which time you agreed to act lawfully. The fees you have been applying to my account in relation to the above are unlawful under Common Law, Statute and consumer regulations.

     

     

    You have taken £796.00 from me, plus the following in £125.73 overdraft interest and I would like to request repayment of this £921.73 total sum. I also ask you to ensure any default notices entered against my credit record are removed entirely.

     

     

     

    Please repay this money in full and remove any default notices within 14 days. If this is not done, I will begin a claim against you for the full amount, plus interest and my costs.

     

     

    Yours sincerely,"

     

     

     

    After this I received a letter dated the 2nd October acknowledging my request and advising I will have a response within 4 weeks.

     

     

     

    I also put a claim for charges in for a joint account I have with my girlfriend at the same time. I never bothered chasing them up on the deadline I had mentioned on the letter, however about 4 weeks letter i get a phone call advising they will be refunding all the charges on the joint account (all charges, I think were in the last 6 months and the account had only been open less than a year) but still did not hear anything about my other account.

    I went to my local branch and they advised the claim was still being processed, so i left it for a few weeks until finally calling last week and being advised there was action to be followed out on the claim on the 21st November.

     

    So, I called them back up on the 21st and they advised that the action was just a letter informing me of my rights regarding my rights regarding taking things to the ombudsman as their time to respond to my claim was almost up.

    The girl at customer relations said i would definitely get a response before the 24th as then their 40 days would be up, so I call them this morning after still not receiving a response today (apart from the letter they had advised me I would receive when I spoke to them on the 21st)

    The customer relations employee advises that they have issued a settlement letter for a figure of £276.00 which is my charges for the last 6 months.

    Later, I called them back to advise them I would be taking things further to see if they would offer anything else and they confirmed that this was their final offer and that they would not refund the total amount they had worked out to be £1091. I had initially advised them in the letter of a total claim amount of £921.73 but it looks like I made a mistake in excel when totaling up all my charges and interest. This still doesn't tally with my figures but I've asked for a letter detailing the charges they are willing to refund and those they are not.

     

    This is when I hit the web and find this site and after going through and finding out about only able to claim 5 yrs in Scotland instead of the 6 (luckily not may charges in that year) in the rest of the UK, working out statutory interest for each charge, and removing my claim for the interest while overdrawn (which simplifies things a bit and keeps it down to one case with the court) I'm left with a figure of £1039.74 (£879.30 + interest of £160.44).

     

    Should i now accept the £276 with the condition I will be now commencing with court proceedings for the rest (I'll round the remainder £763.74 to the £750 I can claim through small claims court, but are the fees for filing with the court supposed to be included with this or are they separate?) and as I advised them that they had 14 days to sort it out in my first letter which was not met by them but I did not chase up (they also did not respond within the 4 weeks they had advised), can I now file with the court without sending some kind of LBA first as they knew I was planning on filing a claim from my initial letter if their response was anything less than what I had asked for?

     

     

    Thanks

     

     

     

    (sorry about the length was just trying to make sure I gave all the background info)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...