Jump to content


NCP/BW ANPR PCN Claimform - double dipping - Ipswich Tacket Street, Ipswich IP4 1AU


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 924 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Where to start?

Last year I had a PCN from NCP regarding allegedly parking in Tacket Street car park, Ipswich.

I could have sworn I appealed but on checking my email outbox, it seems the appeal was never sent!

 

having had a few threatening letters from BW Legal about the matter,

last week some paperwork from the court came through the door and they (BW Legal) have issued proceedings against me on behalf of NCP.

It was issued on 09/08/18 and today I have been online and submitted acknowledgement of service.

 

The question, how do I proceed with this?

Bearing in mind I failed to appeal to NCP and POPLA.

 

They are saying on 28/08/17 I committed a parking contravention, no mention of what contravention or the time it was alleged to have taken place.

 

I had driven in to the car park, dropped off my step daughter and her friend and then returned roughly 30 minutes later to collect them.

They have ANPR images of my vehicle entering and leaving, but not of leaving the first time or re entering later.

I dropped them off, returned home quickly then returned to collect them.

 

I'll try and post copies of the paperwork when I get home.

The claim is signed by BW Legal as opposed to an individual.

 

So, best way to proceed with this?

Edited by honeybee13
Paras, OP's title corrected
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

 

When you have the information to hand, could you supply us with the information requested in the forum sticky please? This will help us to advise you.

 

 

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?465231-Received-a-Court-Claim-From-A-Private-parking-Speculative-invoice-How-To-Deal-With-It-HERE***Updated-Aug-2016***

 

 

There seems to be a typo where you talk about 28/08/2018. What should that be please?

 

 

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

 

When you have the information to hand, could you supply us with the information requested in the forum sticky please? This will help us to advise you.

 

 

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?465231-Received-a-Court-Claim-From-A-Private-parking-Speculative-invoice-How-To-Deal-With-It-HERE***Updated-Aug-2016***

 

 

There seems to be a typo where you talk about 28/08/2018. What should that be please?

 

 

 

HB

 

Should be 28/08/17!

Link to post
Share on other sites

so looks like ANPR double dipping, this could be fun

 

thread title updated

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant National Car Parks Limited

claimants Solicitors: BW Legal

 

Date of issue – 09 August 2018

1.The claimants claim is for the sum £248.84 being monies due from the defendant in respect of a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) for a parking contravention which occurred on 28/08/17 in the private car park/land located at Ipswich Tacket Street, Ipswich IP4 1AU, in relation to a vehicle, Seat Alhambra Stylance TDI registration mark XXXXXXX.

2.The defendant was allowed 28 days from the PCN date to pay the PCN, but failed to do so.

 

3.Despite demand having been made, the defendant has failed to settle their outstanding liability.

4. The claim also includes Statutory Interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum (a daily rate of £0.04 from 28/08/17 to 08/08/18 being an amount of £13.84.

The claimants claim includes £60.00 costs as set out in the terms and conditions.

 

Signed BW Legal services Ltd, claimants legal representative.

 

Will upload copy of POC later

 

What is the value of the claim?

 

£248.84

 

The claim has been issued by BW Legal on behalf of NCP.

Edited by dx100uk
format
Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimformicon.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CPR 31:14icon request running to the solicitors

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim

 

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defenceicon regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

 

………….

 

we don't need a scan of the poc

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

defence is not due till day 33

did you get CPR running?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

must be royal mail.

 

you should be reading up too!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

defence will be an outline of what you want to rely on so for example no breach of contract so no cause for action by claimant

 

You can then add that there were separate 2 parking events and claimant were made aware of this. You then lay it on with a trowel in your witness statement should they continue.

 

 

In the meanwhile you ask then for all of your personal data under the GDPR and make it quite specific that you wnat them to provide the images taken at ( give times of both entries/exits or any CCTV that shows your vehicle remained there for the intervening time.

 

 

In the menawhile dig up anything that shows your vehicle was elsewhere so any receipt/witness that you were likely to be somewhere else will do. parking co are unlikely to actually chanllenge a receipt form a store 20 miles away in court but are likely to say before that time that you could have left your car there and gone on the bus!

 

 

 

Such assertions get short shrift but they do it to get you to fold and pay up without actually attending the hearing. dont feorget, their lawyers conveniently forget that they have a duty to the courts and will try and grab money when they know it isnt owed as they get to keep a bigger slice. They still charge for their services and will push both parties for their own ends but generally drop the matter at the last moment hoping you dont get an order for unreasonable behaviour costs

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Little update, I've still to file my defence, this will be done over the weekend as the 33 days ends on Tuesday.

 

I've had a reply from BW regarding cpr request.

They've supplied copies of notices from NCP, and it seems I did lodge an appeal with NCP which they of course refused.

 

They haven't provided anything regarding planning permission for the signs and have refused to let me see a contract.

Their words being that "I am not obliged sight of the contract and their client will not provide me with a copy".

Link to post
Share on other sites

your defence is due Monday by 4pm - day 33.

 

the one eb outlined will do for now

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

simple, they know they are onto a loser and hope that you waver and agree to apy them something. At this point they dotn care how much as their reputaion as the parking worlds second worst solicitors is in danger of outdoing Gladdys for top spot. they will also gausge how scared you are when you speak to them so they can set their tariff accordigly.

 

They are only aprtially correct about the non production of documents because thsi would be true for the small claims track but that hansnt been decided yet. for example, you may have a disability discrimiantion aspect you want to raise and that could change it to fast track where they would have to furnish the documents.

You can beat them up over that when it gets down to witness statements and they will either have to put up or go home

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you file your defence?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
did you file your defence?

 

Defence was filed, direction questionnaire received and returned as well.

 

 

In the mean time I've had 2 letters from BW, one is an offer to settle out of court for a reduced sum, as they believe my defence is unlikely to succeed, so assuming that's scare tactics. The other seems to be a fishing exercise, and apart from explaining their clients contractual rights, they're asking me to prove the vehicle did in fact leave the car park and return later. They've requested I send them this info by 09/10/18, postmark on the letter is 24/10/18...

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence was filed, direction questionnaire received and returned as well.

 

 

In the mean time I've had 2 letters from BW, one is an offer to settle out of court for a reduced sum, as they believe my defence is unlikely to succeed, so assuming that's scare tactics. The other seems to be a fishing exercise, and apart from explaining their clients contractual rights, they're asking me to prove the vehicle did in fact leave the car park and return later. They've requested I send them this info by 09/10/18, postmark on the letter is 24/10/18...

 

Typical response from a desperate company who knows that they have no chance of success. If they believed your defence wouldnt succeed, then why go for a smaller amount. Theyd be rubbing their hands at an easy win.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

when's the hearing?

if their ANPR system is not upto the job that's their problem

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Responding to your RP there should be no reason why you cant post and update the thread.

 

Regards

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/05/2019 at 12:14, Andyorch said:

Responding to your RP there should be no reason why you cant post and update the thread.

 

Regards

Andy

 

There was a something at the top telling me I needed to flag the topic to admin in order to be able to reply. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...