Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

XS Direct 3k Total Excess


Hajra
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2076 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey can I just ive read this thread and your support and advice has been amazing! I’m now in a similar situation

 

I will be writing to the Ombudsman luckily I have your points that you mentioned to add in.

 

I hit a car I was only doing 30mp and there was no scratches on the car. I received a letter further on saying I owe Xs £3000.

 

I rang them saying what does the cost cover, the first agent said it’s for repairing the car. I said show me a the invoice so I can see what needed to be fixed.

 

I was first advised it is against their policy to send reports.

He then said the 3000 is regardless of what if costs to fix.

 

I then further complained, they have now sent me a report which I find strange considering the agent said it is against their policy.

 

I will attach the report shortly.

 

I hope Ombudsman support my view that Xs is a fraudulent company!

 

Any further advise would be much appreciated.

 

Hajra

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hajra, you should start new thread about your specific case. If the amount xs direct have paid out to the third party is less than £3000, then you should only be liable for relevant sum. And you can arrange repayment over as long a period as you want to, if the policy states no terms for repayment.

 

Make the complaint to xs direct first and then you can go to the FOS, after xs direct final response or after 2 months of the complaint being deadlocked between you. Follow the FOS complaints process to the end and if you have to pay xs direct, then offer the amount over as long a period you think is reasonable.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They emailed me this :

 

As you are aware, your policy carries a £3,000 excess.

That means that any costs incurred below that amount are your financial responsibility.

 

You received a letter on 11 June stating that you are required to pay £3,000 within 14 days.

We settled the Third Party claim on the best available terms to us for the amount of £3,880.65 (of which £3777 was for repairs and the balance was the engineer’s fee).

 

The attached report from the engineer states that the vehicle repairs amount to £3777.

 

The agent on the phone first did not tell me the costs cover the fee he says he was unable to give a breakdown. There’s no way it cost 3777 to fix the car as the collision was minor. I’m sure this is made up.

 

They then says this:

 

As we have acted in accordance with terms of your policy and dealt with the claim in a fair and reasonable manner, we are unable to uphold your complaint. Any excess requested remains payable.

 

Please accept this as our final response.

Please note that should you still be dissatisfied with our decision or the way in which we have handled the matter, you have the right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service, free of charge

– but you must do so within six months of the date of this letter. If you do not refer your complaint in time, the Ombudsman will not have our permission to consider your complaint and so will only be able to do so in very limited circumstances.

 

So I’m guessing I can now respond to the FOS?

 

I’m worried my case will be similar to Jayden’s!

 

I said to Xs I was advise clearly of the £3000 excess to all third parties and in that email they don’t make or clear again. OS

Can I use this against them?

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Own thread created

Please post here now

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi There,

 

sorry i am unsure how to use this!

 

In the policy handbook for XS is doesnt mention repayment terms.

 

The email they sent yesterday said this:

 

"I wish to advise that I have investigated your complaint and can now issue my Final Response.

 

 

 

As you are aware, your policy carries a £3,000 excess. That means that any costs incurred below that amount are your financial responsibility. You received a letter on 11 June stating that you are required to pay £3,000 within 14 days. We settled the Third Party claim on the best available terms to us for the amount of £3,880.65 (of which £3777 was for repairs and the balance was the engineer’s fee). The attached report from the engineer states that the vehicle repairs amount to £3777.

 

 

 

As we have acted in accordance with terms of your policy and dealt with the claim in a fair and reasonable manner, we are unable to uphold your complaint. Any excess requested remains payable.

 

 

 

Please accept this as our final response. Please note that should you still be dissatisfied with our decision or the way in which we have handled the matter, you have the right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service, free of charge – but you must do so within six months of the date of this letter. If you do not refer your complaint in time, the Ombudsman will not have our permission to consider your complaint and so will only be able to do so in very limited circumstances."

 

In her email she did not mention third party. also over the phone when i bought the insurance im sure the agent did not mention it either or make it clear otherwise i would not have gone ahead.

 

I'm worried the FOS will do what they did to Jayden, how can i structure my complaint in a way it gets through to them? XS are disgusting they need to be stopped!

 

Also, when i rang to complain the agent said the 3000 was to fix the car, i said i want to see an invoice he said it is against company policy to hand one but now they have emailed me one and apparently the car needed 12 parts to be repaired which is a lie! Its cheaper to replace a whole engine of car then this.

 

 

Please advise?

 

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can go straight to the FOS. Do this as soon as possible and notify xs direct you have done so.

 

 

Your complaint is 1) unfair contract terms as stated in the other thread you read. and 2) xs direct did not engage with you at an early stage in the claims process, so you could scrutinise third party claim costs and therefore mitigate any possible debt that you might become liable for. Had you been given opportunity to challenge third party claim costs, you might have been able to reduce the amount of the third party loss.

 

 

In the meantime, submit a data protection request to the xs direct claims department for copies of all data/documents processed for the claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...