Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Documents arrived today dated 27th March.  This is a cc taken out a long time ago (2008) and they don't seem to have been able to provide a copy of a CCA agreement, just reams of print outs of lines of texts from old bank statements, default notices etc.   
    • Documents finally arrived today from PRA group.  New day have sent me lots of paperwork, copies of default letters and statements, print out of what looks like a CCA that would have been completed on online, IP address as signature.  This debt is not too old, so possible this is the true copy of agreement ?  Not sure what my defence would be beyond irresponsible lending. 
    • pers i wouldn't.. all you need to know is in the posts of that thread....that being section 127(3) of the CCA refers. if under a CCA return, the 'creditor' claims its a recon, it must not contain any details like a sig, tickbox, or typed name (whether you signed physically or by online tickbox) 1. those are not necessary in a recon, so why inc them? (faked??) 2, it cant thus be a recon!!, it must be a copy of the 'original' from the original creditor, not from a debt buyers filing cabinet. they shouldn't not be 'mixing' some original docs from the OC with crap from their filing cabinet, claiming its ALL a recon! because some of it is faked. just remember there are far more docs like NOA and a DN that are as equally important to a court claim of 'this debt is enforceable'. never rely solely upon the dodgy agreement argument.
    • India has thousands of small gold refineries which are facing more competition from big players.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mortgage Arrears fees


D.J.F.
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2051 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I've gone through [removed] as they've said I can claim money back from Santander for their performance during a mortgage.

They've advised me I CAN claim and to complete their paperwork.

 

Can I ask, is this to do with capitalisation and adding arrears to the principle payments?

 

They're very vague and mysterious as to why and how..... for obvious reasons

 

can I do this myself?

 

Also, can I still claim back excessive charges on my mortgage account?

 

Any help appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you...!! nobody ever answers me lol.

 

[removed] are chasing the adding of arrears to the principle yes? that's their thing...... I will loook into claiming this myself. I haven't looke through everything you've just posted but assume the correct terminologies are in there.

On top of that I have the SAR docs for various creditors to do my homework.

 

Can I ask also, if a secured loan is for 25k (exactly) is it also worth checking? for charges and arrears capitalisation?

 

And finally ( and sorry about this one) I have historic bank charge claims of nearly 20k but was told they could not be claimed despite prooof of hardship at the time. Is it worth re- visiting these?

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

capitalisation...changes nothing..

 

as for the historic charges p'haps post on your existing thread?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks for replying,

 

So, sorry do you or anyone know what [removed] angle for getting money back from my mortgage?

It's to do with having been in arrears.....

I'm trying to find out what this is called and how I can pursue the claim myself instead of paying them....

 

regards,

 

Dan

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't get fleeced

 

typically they claim the mortgage was mis sold then sting you for their fees when it all fails.

 

have you sent satan bank and sar?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

So no it's not for mis-selling (although I have launched a complaint on that myself)

It's also not excessive charges on the account per say.

I think its to do with adding arrears to the principle sum and calculating the interest on the whole amount.

 

I know [removed] have approached the San for info, as they have in turn asked me to authorise them providing it.

 

After 4 months they have contacted me saying I have over paid by quite a bit and they can start proceedings.

However I'd like to just do this myself, as I have with mis-selling and PPI.

 

I'm just wondering what the terminology is for this (capitalisation?) and if there are any template letters or anyone know of successful self-claimers?

Yes I have the SAR info and I'm currently going through it for the charges.

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

par sa i'd not call capitalisation a reason for/ equalling to any right to reclaim extra interest.

I would have expected satans wrote to you and you agreed to it.

 

unless its £100's of fees or penalties they've done this too of many years

I seriously doubt it would amount to anything. [ the extra int, which is the only diff to as below method]

 

much better to reclaim the unlawful arrears fees and any other 'fixed sum' fee you can see in the statements.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, Thanks a lot...!

I definitely intend to write to them about the charges and pursue that, as there were a lot, and they eventually repossesed the house for 3k of arrears. At the same time they applied charges totalling 4k+ on my current account. Satanic indeed.

 

But based on what you've said, I ,ay aswell let [removed] crack on, as it's no win no fee.......

 

They have suggested 'over paying' by 10k.

 

This is script lifted from their website....

 

"We audit mortgages looking for overpayments stemming from missing charges, misallocated payments and interest rate errors"

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry but we loath to recommend using any CMC

if it sounds to good to be true

it usually is...

 

and to me it does...

 

your call.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm loathed to agree that the repo figure is not arrears created by unlawful charges...

if it solely were then go bite satans bank ankles..

 

if the repo reason was solely because their added unlawful stuff then that's not correct and repo was potentially unlawful

only you have that info.. we can only guess..as do the fleecing CMC

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...