Parked with tenants permission, tenant has 2 spaces in their agreement, that overrides any imposition by a gimcrack PPC, the tenants Supremacy of Contract trumps the PPC.

Hi again,

Ive received my FINAL NOTICE in big red letters!!ei

I had a look at post 13 but that seems to be about parking permits.

The land i was on didnt issue permits.

It was just an agreement that the tenant had with the estate agents.

But now im being told that the tenant is supposed to inform the landlord when they have someone parking there so their reg plate is registered.

Hope that makes sense..

by the way i parked here every day for 9 months with no problem before this.

Then one day, all the cars there got tickets ..

Now im a bit worried that although i had permission from the tenant (my friend), he hasnt informed the landlord that i was there. will that make any difference?

2018-09-20 NE Parking Final Notice.pdf

Doesnt matter. Still have supremacy of contract. Remember, PPC's and their pet DCA's dont follow the law. Also note the if, may etc in the letter. Its just a threatogram

upload sorted

thread tidied

Ignore them, it's just a generic letter with mail merge. The give away! The threat of bailiff action. In this case, they could never instruct a bailiff (or EA as they are now called) because the value is too low and if they did consider action, they would be on a loser straight away.

Beggars belief that they stoop so low to get their Christmas Bonus!

Quote, "will that make a difference?" NO IT WONT, it is the tenants space so whatever arrangement the LL dictates to the tenant it goesnt gve the parking co any rights in the matter. Not telling someone your mate is parking there isnt anything to do with the parking co, same as if he put a washing line up withour permission the parking co cant tell him to take it down.

They are writing to the KEEPER of the vehicle because they dont know who was driving and no-one is going to tell them. understand that is part of your rights under any law (just about)

hi all. thanks for all the advice so far. we've just received a letter now from DRP (debt recovery plus) who seem to have taken over the debt for their "clients". I have up until this point ignored everything. is there anything else I need to do at this point? i will upload the letter tomorrow when I get home

Ignore ...get reading other threads

Keep ignoring. They can do even less than your neighbours cat about it.

MY neighbours cat is very demanding but like DR+ he has no rights.

Difference is he is cute

Guys. Ive just realised that the NTK i recieved doesnt mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA)...Is that a problem for them? Also, since i last posted, I have recieved another demand/threat from Debt recovery plus and from Zenith collections, whime i believe are he same company....

Shouls I contact the parking company at all? or just keep ignoring?

Thanks in advance

Continue to ignore. As you state, they are not using the protections of PoFA therefore they cannot rely on it in court (if it gets that far) What this means is that they can only go after the driver and as they don't know who was driving at the time, make the assumption that the driver is also the keeper. Best to keep them in the dark.

Courts don't like these companies making assumptions, only facts

My neighbours cat is still making demands, as yet he has never got as far as suing me for not feeding him or tickling his tummy.

the DCA wants you to feed them or tickle their tummy. Just ignore their constant mewing, they have no say in anything. If they spend some more money you might get a letter from a firm of solicitors. If that happens let us know otherwise no need to do anything yet