Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi dx It's with Step Change. Yes that is the balance outstanding plus interest.
    • Hi All, I don't want to keep asking unnecessary and daft questions but as I read up on on stuff to prepare my defence and tthink about my witness statement, I am perusing the following: The BPA Code of practice states under 13. Consideration and Grace Periods: 13.1 The driver must have the chance to consider the Terms and Conditions before entering into the ‘parking contract’ with you. If, having had that opportunity, the driver decides not to park but chooses to leave the car park, you must provide them with a reasonable consideration period to leave, before the driver can be bound by your parking contract. The amount of time in these instances will vary dependant on site size and type but it must be a minimum of 5 minutes. 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place.   Let's say a motorist spends a minimum of 5 minutes to decide, then decides to park, that 5 minutes now doesn't apply? That doesn't make sense to me. So now that a motorist has parked after consideration, thus commencing the parking period, the decision time doesn't apply and parking time commenced when? .... on entry to the car park? This, as far as I can see is not stated in the [Withdrawn] Government document which says: The Code also makes clear that the consideration period ends at the point when the driver has parked and is therefore considered to have accepted the terms and conditions, which could be within the five-minute allowance. Doesn't say anything about it not applying if a parking event takes place.   [Withdrawn] Private Parking Code of Practice: explanatory document – how was it developed and what will it change? - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK So, according to the BPA, if a motorist inadvertently overstayed by 12 minutes for example, they have the 10 minute grace period but because they decided to park, they don't have the 5 minute consideration period because they decided to park and have overstayed by 2 minutes? Sorry if there's something I'm missing here.  
    • there are several threads here already whereby the judge in such cases only made an order to pay the required sum, the registering of a criminal record is at their discretion or not. dx  
    • Maybe by the time VDL has agreements with other countries in the EU [she could be asking next month], the Tories won't have much time left in office.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Uni withholding Certificate for outstanding debt - even after 6 years


cynopterus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2084 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I have a question that I'm hoping someone may be able to answer.

 

Some years ago I undertook a degree course with the University of Exeter. Unfortunately I was unable to complete the course but did do enough to claim a Cert of HE. However I had a disagreement with the uni about some fees 'owed' for a field trip and they refused to issue the certificate .... so now we arrive at today - more than 6 years later, when thinking of applying to the Open Uni, I contacted them to get official proof of credits and they still refuse citing the 6/7 year old debt as the reason. I mentioned that the debt would be statute barred by now but they still refused.

 

So I have two questions:

 

1) Are they within their rights to do this considering the debt is technically/legally not owed anymore?

 

2) Its possible that i may be having to apply for a DRO in the near future. If i was to do this, and add this debt on to it (even though its now not owed, would they then have to issue the relevant certs/info?

 

If anyone has any info/knowledge/advice they can share I would be most grateful :)

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you not tried just ordering a replacement through their on line store ?

 

https://www.exeter.ac.uk/students/administration/replacementcertificates/

 

The debt is statute barred and you should not be denied in this way.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought it was on line request ?

 

Where does it state you have to ring them ?

 

Certificates - Graduated after 2000

Post-2000 Certificate

£35.00

 

Decrease quantity

1

Increase quantity

Add to Basket

Description

Certificates for graduates who graduated in or after 2000.

 

 

Detailed Description

*** Important *** Please note that you cannot order on behalf of anyone else.

Images shown are for illustrative purposes only and may differ from documents produced.

 

Delivery

 

The certificates will be delivered by first class post or airmail. If you would like delivery by courier, please continue shopping and add the Delivery by Courier to your shopping basket.

 

Queries

 

Please call UK: 0300 555 0444 / International: + 44 (0) 1392 724724 or email [email protected] if you have any queries.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The link appears to be for people who have graduated. As I mentioned I was unable to complete the course so was just looking to get the official modules and points earned document/transcript.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same link....

 

PAST STUDENTS

 

Undergraduates, Postgraduates and International Exchange, Study Abroad and Erasmus students

 

Transcripts of marks for past graduates are available at a charge of 12 pounds each. NB. In some instances our archived records for past graduates are not as extensive as present, this may affect the content of the information we are able to include in your transcript/award confirmation.

 

TRANSCRIPT REQUEST AND PAYMENT

 

Transcripts can be ordered and paid for via our online store.

 

**Students who studied with the College of St Mark and St John are advised to contact the College directly for transcript application details via: Registry, University College Plymouth St Mark & St John, Derriford Road, PLYMOUTH, PL6 8BH. Telephone: +44 (0)1752 636700.

 

Our contact details are as follows:

 

SID Desk University of Exeter Forum Exeter EX4 4SZ U.K.

 

Tel: 00 44 (0)1392 724724 Email: [email protected]

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt may well be statute barred but that does nit mean the debt fizzled out of existence.

It means they cannot chase you for it.

 

 

You couldn't complete the course. ( your fault not the uni)

You had a disagreement with fees for a field trip.

Field trip costs are normally not included in tuition fees.

You went on one so you owe the money.

You need to refer to t & c's

 

Why should the uni issue a cert if you owe money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So I have two questions:

 

1) Are they within their rights to do this considering the debt is technically/legally not owed anymore?

 

2) Its possible that i may be having to apply for a DRO in the near future. If i was to do this, and add this debt on to it (even though its now not owed, would they then have to issue the relevant certs/info?

 

re 1), the debt is still owed. Being statute barred is only about the ability to recover it through court proceedings. They can't bring an action in court against you, but the debt hasn't been extinguished. So if the internal rules of the University say you cannot graduate if you still owe the University money then that can apply for ever unless the debt is settled.

 

I have no idea whether that position would change if you included the debt in a DRO, nor, indeed, what happens if someone owing money makes themself bankrupt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont graduate if you owe money to the uni. Being statute barred doesnt change this, they wont bother chasing the debt but you cant demand anything from them either. the debt doesnt go away, it just isnt enforceable. The govt has a different way of collecting debts. They stop it from your state pension when you retire, even if the debt is 40 years old by then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The govt has a different way of collecting debts. They stop it from your state pension when you retire, even if the debt is 40 years old by then.

 

Are you sure that would apply to debts to universities? I'd think not. Universities aren't government departments or state bodies. They are independent corporations established by Royal Charter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was using that as an example. The relevant bit is that the uni wont award your degree if you still owe them money. That can also include owing money to your landlord if they have their own accommodation agency

The point being that SB only means that they cant use court to collect the money owed, that doesn't mean that the rules on non payment change just because they cant sue you. They have already used the alternative- no paperwork for you until you cough up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...