Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell and PTSD


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2095 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon, everyone.

Hopefully, I've remembered to add all the right details and posted in the correct place.

 

My partner has recently been getting a lot of letters and "ring up and hang up" calls from Lowell Financial LTD. recently. It is due to two unpaid debts to Shop Direct and Capital One for £1,383 and £1,754 respectively. I know that both debts are younger than six years, but I don't have the exact dates to hand at the moment.

 

These were obviously not the original amounts owed, but despite trying to contact the original creditors in the past, new interest has continued piling up as they seem disinterested in being helpful in any way.

 

The reason I am writing here today instead of my partner is that I am her carer, and she is not capable of handling this issue herself.

 

The debts were accrued during my fiancee's marriage to her ex-husband: a repugnantly abusive human being who is responsible for most of the collective £11,000+ debt under my partner's name.

 

He spent many years bullying and coercing her into taking out loans and buying things from catalogues while forcing her to pay for the household bills and keeping every penny of his own income for his own pleasure.

 

Not only is my partner mentally incapable of dealing with this situation due to her PTSD and longstanding mixed-anxiety-depressive disorder, but the constant harassment is triggering episodes and meltdowns

 

I am really worried about her and want to understand if there is anything I can do to deal with this situation.

 

We had a letter through the door today headed: "Assessing your accounts for legal action".

 

I think I understand that this is just a fishing tactic, as Lowell has made endless calls to the house in order to find out whether or not she lives here, but they always hang up the moment I answer the phone (my fiancee never answers the phone herself because of her anxieties).

 

Recently, I dealt with a collection agency for Street UK who were after £5,000 from me for a personal loan to start a business which I could no longer pay at all by explaining my situation absolutely to them.

 

I lost my business and all my income as a result of my own abusive ex-partner, and I explained the catastrophic harm the continued harassment was doing to my mental health because of my own PTSD and my recently diagnosed comorbid avoidant/dependent personality disorder.

 

Since then, they have stopped contacting me entirely.

I feel as if they were more likely to be understanding, however, given that Street UK is in association with the DWP to help people start small businesses (not that I got more than a fraction of the help I was promised by the Jobcentre - but that's another story), and they can't be seen to be too grubby.

 

Lowell, on the other hand, seems to possess no such scruples, given the various reports I read online. Sure, I know I should be mindful that nobody will speak very nicely of them, given that nobody likes paying debts, but the themes are too significant and consistent to ignore.

 

We have tried securing a debt-relief-order for the household, but our car is still worth more than £1000, which makes things problematic since we are loath to sell it. It is, after all, costing us less to maintain than an old banger would, which would quickly run-up costs.

 

We are worried, since we just don't have the wherewithal or the money to handle this situation, and are already mired in court cases against my own ex for domestic abuse and parental alienation (16 months no contact with my children and counting).

 

Lowell's cruelty just feels like poverty-punishment at this point.

We only recently had to shell out £100+ because our car's road tax ran out at the start of the month, and we had no choice but to wait and not use it until the end of the month when PIP came in.

 

Surprise, surprise, some jobsworth just magically appeared to clamp our vehicle in the interim. We couldn't buy food or pay utility bills for this month, and I've had to negotiate with my utility company to accept late payments for the next two months without punishing us.

 

So, yeah... sorry if this is in the wrong place or is too verbose - I get like that when I'm anxious.

 

I should also probably add that we have contacted StepChange in the past, and were informed that there wasn't much they could do to help us at the time.

Edited by dx100uk
Merge/spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Until/unless you get a letter of claim id forget about them

Nothing much you can do by entering into pointless letter tennis

 

Have you contacted action fraud and got a ref number about all the fraud

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you list all of the other debts please, how much, who's chasing, etc.

 

 

STAY OFF the phone to any of these vultures, keep EVERYTHING in writing.

 

 

Have all of the charges been reclaimed on these?

 

 

Have you got ALL of the statements and know exactly how these debts are made up, and what charges can be reclaimed.

 

 

Once they are aware that you're in financial difficulty, then they 'should' stop interest and charges, those that don't get £1 a month for the life of the debt.

 

 

IF, any of these have been terminated by the original creditor, then NO interest OR charges can be added.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...