Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

fraudulent JD Williams account - ID theft - Lack of Due Diligence Checks?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2098 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have recently found out that someone has applied for a credit account with JD Williams on my behalf.

 

They had filled in the online application form with my Name, Date of Birth, a random London address and claimed I had just moved there from an address 4 years ago.

 

Now, with every credit application I have ever made, from a Loan or Credit Card to a mobile phone contract, there has always been a process of verification to confirm I am infact living at the address given and who I say I am.

 

These searches show on my credit report as soft searches as they were used to confirm my identity. If I apply for any credit accounts soon after moving, I struggle myself as the verification processes fail until my existing accounts feed the updated info back to the credit reference agencies.

 

My concern with JD Williams and the 12+ other sub sites they operate is that there is no identity check performed and from a search online, a lot of people are having the same issue as me, many more finding out when a debt is passed to a collection agency and the victim is found.

 

I am 100% confident that JD Williams do no due diligence checks prior to processing the Hard Credit Search which adds the new linked address to your report. If they did attempt to check my identity electronically before processing the credit application, it would have failed as I was not known at the address supplied.

 

The concern I have is that a fraudster can easily manipulate someones credit report without needing to verify anything, not even your email address. The company generally offers very high APR rates of 50%+ so I would assume this is targeted at those with bad credit histories and its likely most people are granted credit.

 

I have reported to the FSA & ICO but they suggest that action would only be taken if they receive enough reports.

 

I just feel not enough people are aware of why they were victims of fraud so easily because anyone that knows you personally and where you live, can easily order products on credit under your name and they dont even need to have any communication sent to your actual address.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing/moved
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to CAG Chump

 

Lets roll this back - Have you complained direct to JD Williams? If so - Have you referred it to the FOS?

This will allow you do to do something about your case.

 

JD Willaims ID+V process will use a risk assessment application / protocol to assess credit applications. Just to add that when applying for credit after you have just moved - Its not a dead cert that it will fail - Due to the length of time that it takes to for that info to filter through to all 3 CRAs...

However each company has different verification processes. Sometimes when applying for credit - They will ask for a debit card to verify ID. They do this because there are products from all 3 CRAs and others that run various security checks including matching payment details to your address through bank records etc.

 

It is really fascinating how they do it - However each company is strictly regulated by the FCA but it is up to them what verification checks they do. The FCA do not have a "Standard Framework" for this. Lets say you update your address with the bank. instantly that means that if you suddenly apply for credit and they do this method to verify you - It wont fail

 

Check out https://www.callcredit.co.uk/products-and-services/fraud-and-id/callvalidate

This is one of those products.

 

I could go on for hours about this. Think of it this way. The barrier of entry to higher APR products is much lower.

The Acceptance level for Higher APR products can be so lax that Fraud is rife... Irresponsible Lending is also a side effect of this.

 

Im am very interested in how JDW defended themselves... So please do spill :)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Titled updated and moved to CAT forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have complained to JD Williams and they have advised they are fully GDPR Compliant and registered with the FCA so of course they do the relevant checks. The problem is, they dont perform any identity check at all. Their GDPR team members told me and I quote "We are trying our best to become GDPR compliant". Like that became a requirement 2 months ago now and a financial company really should be up to scratch.

 

I understand the verification of addresses that can be done with a Bank Card, again this would rely on the correct address being given in the 1st instance and would protect individuals from having their credit reports updated by just anyone on a website. All other financial companies do some sort of check that the information supplied is genuine and would require at least the correct address to be known by the account holder. If they had done any form of identity check to ensure the data supplied is true then it would have failed as the applicant would surely know where they had lived over the past 4 years and there was no trace of the new london address on my credit report.

 

Im just shocked that with all other credit providers I have always needed to prove who I am before they let me apply rather than rely on a website tick box to verify its not fraudulent info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GDPR has been a headache for every company... It is a genuine struggle and JDW struggling wouldnt surprise me.

 

Its very difficult to get 100% compliance of ID Checks. You unfortunately were one of the unlucky ones. Online fraud is becoming so prevalent these days its so ard to be 100% successful in preventing fraud.

Some companies can do more to lower their ID Fraud rates by adding in these extra methods as you say, but even then no system is foolproof.

 

Now have JDW put you back in the position you were before they touched your credit file, etc?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do get its been a headache but its a large company, they should have some idea. How many years have businesses been requiring you to confirm your email address? The reason is that once you have verified your email its confirmation it belongs to you. Makes it a little safer to send over account details such as password resets, order confirmations or credit application data. A simple typo and all those emails go off elsewhere to someone else. Its just basic security. With JDW, you dont need to verify anything and the whole process of applications could be automated to be done in bulk. From a security point of view, its crazy

 

And I do get that not all identity checks are 100% and that fraud will always happen but I do expect fraudsters to have to work a little harder than this. There is no chance with the information supplied by a fraudster that it could possibly have been checked to be valid and thats my whole point. They are required to do due diligence and its fair to say if they did, they would have prevented this instance of fraud and many similar ones. Come on, how obvious is it when a new catalog account comes through at a completely new unverified address.

 

JDW are in the process of putting things right in terms of my credit report but I feel that they are putting everyone at risk of financial fraud because they don't bother with any security checks. Maybe its just me but I feel opening a financial account should require more security than a simple tick box or am I really just too untrusting?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...