Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Blemain Finance 2nd Mortgage Charges Reclaiming - i want my moneyback


webbscatering
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1948 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Received my bumper pack from my SAR request and contains about 500 pages of stuff plus a CD, after going through this lot I now put the info onto the CISheet which shows total charges of £3806 plus £5013 of compound interest equalling £8820.

 

Ocean Finance charged £1000 for setting this all up which I guess is their secret commission

 

Plus there is another £2000 in legal fee's not added to the account but held in limbo and to be charged at the end of the loan term.

 

My question is do we proceed like we used to when claiming back bank charges and is this the correct letter to use?

 

 

Dear Sirs,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXXXXX

 

I am writing to ask you to refund the charges which you charged to my account in respect of late payment fees to the sum of £ XXXX. I now understand that such fees are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent consumer Regulations.

 

In addition your charges appear to represent an unfair term of contract which is contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (SI. 1999/2083). My account falls within the ambit of Regulation 5 of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 as I am a consumer. Your charges constitute an unfair penalty under Schedule 2 of the said Regulations, which provide an indicative and non-exhaustive list of terms which may be regarded as unfair. Under paragraph 1(e) of schedule 2 this specifically includes terms which have the object of requiring any consumer who fails his obligation to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation. I would vigorously contend that this is the position regarding the fees which you deemed fit to apply to my account.

 

I would like to bring your attention to the following statement by The Office of Fair Trading:

 

"A term in a mortgage agreement which requires the borrower to pay more for breaching the contract terms than actual costs and losses caused to the lender by the breach (or a genuine pre-estimate of that) is likely to be regarded as an unfair penalty and to be unenforceable both at common law and (in a consumer mortgage) under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations.

 

I believe that the charges you have levied of £XXXX far exceed any true cost to yourself as a result of our breaches and any genuine pre-estimate you could conceivably reach. If you disagree, then will you please demonstrate this by letting me have a full breakdown of the costs to which you have been put to as a result of our breaches, in order to reassure us that your charges really do reflect your costs.

 

Thus I am asking that you refund the charges and other fees which have been levied on my account. If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively, within the time limits set out in your official complaints procedure I will enter a formal complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and departments.

 

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you will prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

XXXX

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it better to use the staint sheet = more wonga?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

okay thanks

 

Is it better to use the staint sheet = more wonga?

 

 

can you point me in the right place for the staint sheet, cheers

 

can you point me in the right place for the staint sheet, cheers

 

 

found it

 

Is it better to use the staint sheet = more wonga?

 

 

This sheet appears to be for PPI Redress... with simple interest at 8% the CISheet I applied interest at 11.10% because that was the interest Blemein applied to the arrears. I'm I doing this right?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just before I send off the letter and CIS sheet just want to make sure that the letter above is the correct one, and has anyone had much success with the company by way of getting back their charges?

 

This got me thinking,

about 9 years ago we had a repossesion order,

we complied with the terms of the possesion order to continue paying the loan plus an additional amount to cover the arrears.

 

In 2015 we cleared the arrears and have not missed a payment since

we asked for the possession order to be removed but Blemein refused claiming they can use it any time without having to go to court should we have problems.

 

Can they still hold a loaded gun to our heads even though we complied implicitly with the order to clear the arrears?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes sadly.

 

but wont this wipe it out

use the CI sheet then correct as your int rate is higher

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the interest rate we are claiming is 11.10% so this has put our claim up to £8300. The loaded gun seemed all to real, whereas our prime lender Santander capitalised the arrears and ripped up the possesion order, I know it added to the longevity of the mortgage but still it helped me not worry if things go pear shaped.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

as a results of your old reclaim after the court case here?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

we have never put a a claim in for the return of the charges this is our first attempt so I don't know what they are on about.

 

We did ask for the building insurance to be deducted from the account because this was taken out without our consent and we had a policy in place, thats the only time we asked for a refund of any sort.

 

This is the first time we are asking for the charges for late or missed payments altogether totally different to the building insurance cost they added to the account.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahh yes I remember this now,

I never got anywhere with my complaint about the building insurance.

 

To cut to the chase whilst we had a repossession hearing in 2010 which was suspended we asked the judge if the payment dates could be changed from the middle of the month to the end of the month he said that was a contractual issue therefore he was not interested.

 

These clowns would not change the dates without a Variation order...

the Variation order was pointless as this was to change the terms in a contract not particularly applicable to changing payment dates.

 

After all said and done they did change the payment date without a Variation Order after we agreed to pay an extra amount to take the payments to the end of the month.

 

They did not at anytime offer to do this whilst we asked them previously therefore they knew adding late payment fees would amount to a nice tidy sum for them.

 

I'm going to write to them and ask for a transcript of the phone call and letters which suggest that I asked for the late payment charges back because if I'm right they anticipated that I might go after the charges at some point and thats why they put it in the final response letter.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you read further down it looks like you did send a letter then?

and read post 121 too

 

id be sending them an sar its free now if you want the calls but I bet they wont have them.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats exactly my point no conversation took place regarding the return of the charges before or after the court case.

I have a bumper pack sent from my previous SARS request and I cannot find anything that would suggest i asked for the charges back.

 

Their last letter is full of BS as it states the charges are correct because their tariff says so...oh whoopi Doo.

 

There is no mention of "Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999" I wonder why?

obviously it wouldn't because I never spoke to them about it as this would have been my first point of argument,

so I know I didn't have any conversation with them regarding late payment charges.

 

I'm going to write a letter in the next couple of days criticising the stupid letter they sent me

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've gone through the SARS pack and scanned the letters relating to these charges and there is no mention of us requesting the return of them but there is references where we have said that we are not happy with the charges they have applied, would this be a valid argument to proceed with?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

valid argument..for what…

you've complained about the charges on two occasions, they've buffed you off...

 

my feelings are your only route now is a court claim for both lots.....[well the whole lot]

 

you wont get any where with the fos I bet.

.dont think theres one case whereby they've decided against BF saying tough luck..

 

things being in their T&C's mean nothing...else we'd have had no PPI reclaims nor bank charges cases won all!!

 

hard nut though

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need to keep hitting reply with quote

just type..it makes the thread twice as long to scrool thru...…...

I know what ive typed above

 

click the LBA link in your post...….

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

see the martin2006 or shelley threads then

sure theres a lba for mortgages stuff to.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Found this:-

 

5 MORTGAGE ARREARS CHARGES

 

Mortgage Arrears Template Letter

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...emplate-letter

 

Mortgage charges and other unfair treament Particulars of Claim template

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...Claim-template

 

Categories: Library materials

 

then got this:-

 

webbscatering, you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

 

Your user account may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?

If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation. You may not have sufficient posts to permit you to carry out your intended action.

 

What Happened?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have adapted the lbaand it reads like this:

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

CARD/ACCOUNT NUMBER: *****

 

We now understand that the regime of fees which you have been applying to my account in relation to late Payment Fees, Dishonoured Receipt Charges, Telephone Charges, Letters, Buildings Insurance, Monthly Charges and its interest charges, are unlawful at Common Law, Statute Consumer regulations also Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (UTCCR).

 

We would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that we opened our account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

We calculate that you have taken £3806 in charges and we also claim restitutionary interest of £5230, making a total of £9036.

 

We enclose a Schedule of Charges listing the amounts that I require to be repaid.

 

We require repayment in full of this money and if you do not comply fully within 14 days, We shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest, plus our costs, without further notice.

 

 

Have I missed anything or can I send it?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

over four weeks have passed and we haven't received a response from Blemein Finance so it looks like we are going to MCOL.

 

I found dx100 "Particulars of Claim" template which is brilliant as usual but there is also a guide to filling out the claim form on the MCOL site can someone send me the link, thanks

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...