Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

An interesting question. HFC debt sold to TBI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2092 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Front loaded ppi of £2000 including interest taken out with a HFC loan in 1996.

At the time the advisor told me the PPI was mandatory.

 

For various reasons I never made a single payment.

In JUne 1997 I successfully defended HFC’s attempt to obtain a ccj, with the District Judge throwing out their case due to defects in HFCs’s calculations.

HFC subsequently sold the debt to TBI Financial Services.

TBI kept contacting me until the debt became statute barred in 2003.

 

Within the last two months I contacted HSBC, who own the HFC portfolio, to claim a refund on the PPI.

My argument here being the PPI was front loaded, and included in the debt sold to TBI therefore it is HSBC’s responsibility to put me back in the position I should be had I not taken out the PPI.

 

HSBC sent me a letter dated 16th July, making a “full and final offer”, agreeing to a refund of circa £2100.

 

On 20th July HSBC contacted me via telephone to say there had been a mistake as the ppi was cancelled when I defended the ccj in 1997.

When I made the point the front loaded ppi had still been included in the debt sold to TBI I was told this didn’t matter!

 

When I receive HSBC’s refusal letter I do intend to take this to the FCSA unless HSBC have a clawback option on the sale. Welcome views?

Edited by dx100uk
spacong
Link to post
Share on other sites

They still took you to court!

They still got some money back when they sold the debt to TBI

They still got more back via their bad debt business insurance

They still had the backhander PPI commission they got from selling the insurance for the underwriters.

 

if you cant get them on PPI directly go for a Plevin claim.

 

send them a free SAR.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But...." For various reasons I never made a single payment. " and " In June 1997 I successfully defended HFC’s attempt to obtain a CCJ, with the District Judge throwing out their case due to defects in HFCs’s calculations. "

 

If you never made a payment how can you be entitled to claim the PPI back ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the PPI was front loaded, in effect another loan plus interest, and added to my total debt sold to TBI. Albeit that debt is statue barred, it is not extinguished as tbi can ask for, but not enforce its repayment.

 

IF HFC has not included the PPI principal sum plus interest in the debt sold to TBI I would not be pursuing it.

 

As they did HSBC should either buy back the loan, and offset the PPI element if the sale contract permits, or make that payment to me.

 

My rationale there is I owe the money to TBI, so HSBC making the payment to me will return me to the position I was in prior to having the PPI loan forced upon me.

 

If the PPi had been a monthly % of the loan, rather than front loaded I would have no case.

 

Equally if HFC had not sold the debt I would have no case.

 

If they had removed the PPI principal sum and the interest Before selling it I would again have no case.

 

Interestingly one HSBC employee agreed with the logic, but said it was not “right” hence the revision of the offer.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with them if you never paid anything back.....your not due a refund...if anything you still owe them the full loan ..less the PPI.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing in the FOS nor FCA ppi stuff thats says anything about ..you must have paid the loan off or youve only paid xx% of the loan..so you only get Xx% of a reclaim

 

Cheeky yes fo reclaim..but these fleecers should never had cha rged ppi to millions of people

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no it doesn't say that

it says the ppi premiums + interest

nowhere does it say 'what you have paid'

 

ive known 100's of people get back the full PPI charged even when they'd defaulted or only paid 1 month etc etc.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The PPI was paid upfront and HSBC (HFC) chose to sell the debt, including the PPI and associated interest to a venture capital firm. TBI paid for the debt, including the PPI front loaded element and interest. They can continue to ask for it to be repaid, albeit without legal enforcement. TBI do not draw a distinction between the PPI and capital loan, they simply want the full sum repaid.

 

I therefore believe I can seek redress from HSBC who missold the PPI and received payment for it from a third party. If I was making payments to TBI then I am sure I would be advised to seek redress from HSBC. The facts are the PPI was missold, and it has been settled (bought) by a third party. The original creditor did not reduce the outstanding balance by the frontloaded PPI and interest prior to its sale. HSBC admit the debt sold included the PPI, albeit they say this therefore resulted in the cancellation of said policy. TBI want full repayment so who should settle the PPI element?

 

My position is that should be HSBC either via a clawback agreement if it exists (which I am 99% certain it does not), or by paying the sums concerned to me. I can then decide if I wish to give money to the venture capitalists concerned. I am sorry if I come across as somewhat belligerent, but I know this principle has been successfully applied in at least one other case of which I am aware.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But neither HSBC or TBI can go near a court room to claim it...the debt dates back to 1997...21 years ago.....its no longer on your credit files...so its irrelevant whether the figure is loaded with + 2K PPI or not

 

You wont be paying it...so why do you need it adjusting...TBI balance sheet is irrelevant to you.

 

Unless of course you wanted to settle the debt from a moral stance?

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant agree more

they were a terrible lot.

 

I distinctly remember one time in the late 80's

was walking thru a local shopping centre [very new]

 

was spotted with 2 young kids in a push chair

was taken to their newly open loan shark jail taking up almost 1/3rd of the top floor

told I must now take out PPI on the 3 products I already had

 

even remember her name...cow!!

 

if only we knew better then..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From my perspective at least a very pleasing update, with HSBC having now made a payment of around £2100 into my current account.

 

In the end they accepted my argument ppi had been missold, the cost of the front loaded premium and associated interest had been met when they sold the total debt to TBI, and if there was no clawback agreement in place redress should be made to me. The only disappointment was no 8% interest, as HSBC’s position remains that is only applicable in the case of paid premiums. I am somewhat tempted to test that assertion with FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suspect this was a flexi loan plus

so you wouldn't get the 8% as its treated as a credit card

its the right time for that...

 

good win

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...