Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I suspect the bus ticket inspector deleted my oyster card journey history - bus penalty fare


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2097 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Two weeks ago I boarded a bus at around 8:00am in London.

I got off the bus a few stops later to head into a local Tesco store to buy my lunch for the day.

I then walked back to the bus stop that I got off at and waited for the next bus to take me to work.

 

The next bus arrived at 8:30am.

It was one of those buses where passengers can board the bus on either the front, middle or back door.

I boarded the bus from the back door.

 

I sat downstairs and minded my own business, staring through the window and browsing on my phone.

A few minutes later, I heard a bus ticket inspector saying "tickets please" and that was when I was made aware that a ticket inspector was on board the bus.

I got out my oyster card ready for him to scan it with the card reader.

 

When he placed his card reader against my card, he asked me to take out my oyster card from the cardholder.

I thought the reason why he wanted me to take out my card from the cardholder was because the cardholder was preventing his card reader from checking whether I had tapped in.

 

However, when he then said "it appears you haven't tapped in for this journey",

I realised to my horror that I had in fact forgotten to tap in when I boarded this bus, so I told him that I forgot to.

 

then got out a small note pad and asked me to write down my name, address and date of birth, to which he used it to confirm that the card really does belong to me and he asked me to show him an ID that has my name on it and where did I board this bus and which stop I was planning to get off at.

 

He then told me that he was going to issue me a penalty fare of £40 for not tapping in.

I said to him that if you look at my journey history you will be able to see that I had previously boarded a bus at 8:00am and that if you look at the time now you can see that it's 8:35am, which means that under the Hopper Fare scheme, I would not have been charged for this journey anyway because I boarded this bus within the hour and hence I was not intentionally fare dodging.

However, he said "you still need to tap in anyway" and proceeded to issue me with a penalty fare.

 

He then handed me the bus penalty fare notice and asked me how I would like to settle it.

I asked him “what options do I have?”

He said that I need to pay £40 for the penalty.

 

Because I needed to get off the next stop and I was late for work, I asked if I can pay later.

He then said that if I don't pay now, it would be £80.

 

However, having had a careful read through the notice, I realised that he omitted saying that if you don't pay within 21 days, then the penalty would go up to £80, it will be £40 if you pay within 21 days, so I thought there was some deliberate scaremongering on his part.

 

When I got back home from work that day,

I had a careful read through the penalty notice slip and read that I have a right to appeal against it.

 

I decided to appeal on the grounds that I boarded a previous bus at 8:00am and how under the Hopper Fare scheme, I wouldn't have been charged anything for this second bus that I got on at 8:30am because I boarded it within the hour.

 

i logged onto my oyster card account to get a screenshot of my journey history for that day to go with the appeal claim so that they can see that I did get on a bus at 8:00am in the hopes that they would be lenient about it and therefore waive the fee.

 

However, I was very shocked to see that there was no record of me getting on the first bus at 8:00am!

All the other trains and buses that I got on for that day were there apart from this 8:00am record of me getting on a bus.

 

I definitely remember tapping in for this journey and hearing a beep and seeing the green light because I got on it from the front door and there was a bit of a hold up because there was a passenger in front of me in the queue who asked the driver whether this was the bus that goes to so and so.

 

This had me suspecting whether the bus ticket inspector may have deleted this particular bus journey history from my account so that I don't stand a chance from getting a successful appeal. T

he more I think back to it, the more I suspect that he had something to do with it.

He kept hold of my oyster card throughout the journey and didn't give it back to me until I told him that I was getting off at the next stop.

 

And during that time, I was not sitting facing him, he was standing behind me, so I suspect that he might have had a check through my journey history and used his card reader to delete this 8:00am bus journey history or colluded with the person on the phone who was checking to confirm my details to have it deleted off the system.

 

Maybe it's just simply a case of coincidence

- that it turns out there was a technical fault with the yellow oyster card reader on the first bus which meant that it didn't make a record of me tapping in.

Otherwise, it sure is very sinister and sly of them to do this

- they can make money out of innocent people.

 

it makes me wonder if these inspectors have a quota to fill or an incentive or a commission awarded for catching fare dodgers?

 

I'm wondering if there's anyone here who has been through a similar situation as me

– I would like to hear your experience,

and does anyone here know whether it's possible that your journey history can be deleted by an oyster card reader used by a ticket inspector?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to consider what is more likely:

 

A) there is a conspiracy to issue penalty fares, and the staff go around deleting Oyster card histories without creating an audit trail, and no one has noticed

B) having not tapped in on the second bus, you might have not tapped in on the first, and heard a beep / saw a green light for someone else’s card (or had ‘card clash’ with one of your own cards - have you checked the statements for all your other contactless cards?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no it is not possible to wipe individual data.

and no they would never do that its called FRAUD!! and could end him up in prison.

there are no quotas..old wives tale.

 

sadly I suspect you didn't tap in sadly

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to consider what is more likely:

 

A) there is a conspiracy to issue penalty fares, and the staff go around deleting Oyster card histories without creating an audit trail, and no one has noticed

B) having not tapped in on the second bus, you might have not tapped in on the first, and heard a beep / saw a green light for someone else’s card (or had ‘card clash’ with one of your own cards - have you checked the statements for all your other contactless cards?

 

 

It wasn't a contactless card and my cardholder was only storing the blue oyster card. This has never happened before where a bus or train journey has not been recorded on my journey history, hence why it felt like it was too much of a coincidence and had me suspicious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oyster uses RFID. Were/Are there any other cards in the same holder as your Oyster card that also have RFID tags in them? Credit, Debit, Work ID cards, anything like that?

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The inspector cannot delete the journey history and they're not on commission.

The journey history sometimes doesn't update online until next day.

 

Check today and if no joy, check on one of the ticket machines at any underground station.

If the journey is there you have grounds for appeal,

 

however, the penalty fare was issued correctly because even on the hopper fare scheme you are required to scan your card.

 

Same as daily capping, once you reach it, you still tap the card but you don't get charged.

 

Tfl are quite lenient in these situations, so if you were not going to be charged for that journey they might cancel the penalty fare.

 

Don't accuse the bus inspector to tampering with the oyster because that would be seen as a complaint which will go back to him/her.

 

Inevitably the bus inspector would get the union involved and they might even start proceedings for defamation.

 

My brother is in a transport union and followed 2 cases in the past year.

In one of them tfl was refusing to disclose the complainant's name, but they had to eventually.

 

Both cases were taken to county court, unlike what I thought that only high court hears such cases.

 

They never reached the judge because the cases were withdrawn following out of court agreement.

 

Don't know if money exchanged hands, but surely the passengers making the malicious complaints would now think twice before accusing someone of criminal activity.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Would the first bus have CCTV coverage that might show the card reader showing green?

 

 

I'm aware that most buses have CCTV installed but I don't know if there's a CCTV on the bus that directly captures coverage of the card reader.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...