Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yea but the annoying this is that they're not based in england so they won't even come. Just a 2mo delay for no apparent reason.
    • Hi dx, thanks. Yes actually, that is the case with this one! I've taken tomorrow off work, I need to review the whole binder for each of these and I'll refrain from further questions until I do just that. Just on hold for court ref Claim #2
    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Old A+L Loan charges reclaiming + CCA return


Simon1959
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1551 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

RE:

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?483703-been-paying-Gregory-Pennington-12yrs-now

 

Yes all of them I was expecting Santander to at least contact us ,as this is the only original creditor and they havn,t even acknowledged she owes them anything

 

How do you go about claiming charges back from some of these old accounts is there a template we can use and what charges can you claim back

In other words I have no idea how to go about this or what we can try and claw back

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

you'll need all the statements first?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

fixed sum fees

dd unpaid, late, over limit, letter, phone

 

you'll spot them £12,£15 £25 etc etc.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Santander have contacted us with a notice of sum in arrears the amount owed is £535 on a personal loan

This is in reference to missed payments from November when she left the debt management company

They would like her to contact them to help her pay it

So as this seems to have slipped in under the radar is it a case of

A = sending a CCA request

B = SAR them for charges

C = Offer a F&F settlement for 50%

D = Ignore them

 

I would have thought they have the CCA although it was from approximately 13 years ago

I would imagine that it's riddled with charges

I doubt that they will except a deal unless it's unenforceable

Ignoring them will probably lead to a CCJ

 

I've probably answered my own questions really but would just like an opinion on which direction to go in

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

a and b 1st!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar is everything

if you await +25th under GDRP its than free

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

read the sar carefully

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without sounding a bit dim

should I be reading the letter I send them carefully or the legislation regarding SAR requests

 

It appears from what I have read that it's more medical information that an extra charge can be levied

 

Ah I have just read the new (free one ) it appears they can charge a reasonable amount to cover the cost of supplying the info

Link to post
Share on other sites

one fee gets everything

if you await till the 25th under GDPR it will be free

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just received a signed credit agreement from Santander (old alliance and Leicester a.c.) statement of account to follow which I'm assuming is riddled with charges

Is there a template letter on here to use to claim them back

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop them in the FOSCISHEET first

see shelley thread or martin2006 thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still waiting for the statement of account even after having a copy of the signed credit agreement Santander don't seem to be pushing it considering there's been no payment on this account since November

Link to post
Share on other sites

let it run

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the letter from Santander accompanying the signed credit agreement from 2005

 

It states "under the consumer credit (cancellation notice and copies of documents) regulations 1983 we can comply with the legal requirements by sending a copy of an agreement in the same form as the one that was signed ,

but excluding the signature box , customer signature and the date of signature

 

Is this correct

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting a copy of your credit agreement | National Debtline

https://www.nationaldebtline.org/EW/factsheets/Pages/.../credit-agreement-advice.aspx

Know your rights when asking for information about your credit agreement. Advice on how to ask for the information and how your creditors must behave.

 

might help, in any case pre 2007 CCA1974s must be an actual copy of original ( original with signature>?) comes to mind?

 

 

others will respond also

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are correct, HOWEVER!,

 

 

You would always question as to why they felt the need to supply a copy of the original agreement with the signature box and date it was signed redacted, surely if they had it they would send it in its entirety.

 

 

When they fail to, then it is either because they don't hold the original document, which they will need to produce in court, OR they are lying about holding the original and hoping you'll fall for their lies by accepting their untruths and giving in.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...