Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charging Order Advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2107 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Looking for advice regarding a really old CCJ, Interim and Final Charging Order placed during an IVA.

 

My partner and her ex both entered into a joint IVA I believe in 2007, one of the creditors was Lombard Direct (part of RBS I believe) was included in the IVA.

 

Lombard Direct did not respond to any requests to company managing the IVA at any time during the process, so did not receive any dividends whatsoever, but the debt was listed.

 

My partner was informed not to engage with any of the creditors involved in the IVA at anytime.

 

The IVA was completed successfully and completion certificates issued in 2011.

 

So we now discover that a charging order has been placed on her property by Lombard direct at a date after the commencement of the IVA, this is something that she had no idea about until now as it is only now that she is looking to sever financial ties with her ex. and is wanting to sell the property or transfer equity, this charge has been flagged as an issue with the new mortgage provider.

 

Upon further investigation it would appear that the IVA commenced in Feb\March 2007, the CCJ was obtained in May 2007 the interim CO in May 2007 and the final CO in Sept 2007. My partner is adamant that no paperwork was received, she may have been abroad at this time working or living at an alternative address.

 

My partner has tried to contact the company that managed the IVA which unfortunately has been taken over, or bought out a number of times over the years and has had little success in getting any advice or information as to what to do. Equally the insolvency service have been unable to provide much information due to the age of the IVA.

 

So we are appealing for help or advice on how to take this forward, given that there was no knowledge of any proposed legal action it was not possible to make any response to the action taken over the debt. The debt was covered by the IVA so any action should not have been valid.

 

Would it be possible to make an application to get the charging order set aside?

 

Sorry for the long post but we would really appreciate any help or advice on this matter.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i just clarify...

 

Its a joint debt

On the same property they still own

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i just clarify...

 

Its a joint debt

On the same property they still own

 

The debt was solely in my partners name, although one of the conditions of the IVA was that all debts her, his and joint should be considered as joint debts for the purposes of the IVA (there was a joint and several clause I believe)

 

The charging order that has been issued is against her but it is a joint property that they both currently own, her ex is looking to take over the property which is how knowledge of the charge has come about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could go for a set aside via the courts, will cost you £255 but you will need some significant paperwork surropunding the whole issue or there wont be a reason to change the status quo. Now, depending on what you can eventually dig up you may have Lombard over a barrel regarding costs so the court fee might be reclaimable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could go for a set aside via the courts, will cost you £255 but you will need some significant paperwork surropunding the whole issue or there wont be a reason to change the status quo. Now, depending on what you can eventually dig up you may have Lombard over a barrel regarding costs so the court fee might be reclaimable.

 

we have the IVA completion certificate, IVA reference number, we have the schedule of creditors included in the IVA, the details of the court the IVA was lodged, we are trying to track down details of the court judgements which I believe may have been Telford, any thoughts as to what else may be required please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...