Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Need Advice with RBS PPI (Scotland)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2084 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In 2012 I entered a Protected Trust Deed.

 

The reason for the TD was quite simple the RBS wanted to get a decree for a loan in arrears but not defaulted, which would have allowed them to apply to get a unsecured loan converted to a secured loan on our house and then push for enforcing against the house.

 

This was straight from RBS lawyers at the time. So the trustee gave us a letter for the court which stopped that. But end result was a 5 year protected trust deed.

 

Before we got to that stage we did attempt to claim for any mis-sold ppi we had with RBS to be told we had none.

 

Our Total debt to RBS was approx. £15,500... Fast forward a couple of years.

 

I was discharge form 5 and no PPI was found by the trustee (standard procedure to check).. Funny thing was they found PPI for my wife with RBS .. I was now fully discharge form 6 also. The bank sent a letter to my wife saying they who could only pay out 50% because it was in joint names with someone else... only person that could be is me..

 

Now as I'm fully discharge and trustee have stated they are not interested in any PPI which is in my name. I asked RBS to recheck using the account number on the Wife letter. Low and behold they have found 4 accounts totalling over £17,000 worth of PPI not including interest dating back to 2004 and 2008 and onwards on car loans, personal loans etc most of it was front loaded onto the loans etc. with the resulting extra interest.

The PPI is enough to have easily cleared the original debt to RBS.

 

I don't know if they will refund it but that's a different story.. but they did on the wifes 50% as both of us where working and both our employer had sickness policy's in place 6 month full wages then 6 months half wages.

Surely getting told you don't have it when you did must surely be a big no no.

 

If the point of a PPI reclaim is to put the person back to the position they would have been if the PPI was never sold. Or if they had allowed us to claim on the PPI we would never have been in the Trust deed in the first place.

 

Now how would you proceed.

Thanks

Ed

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it your in Scotland ed-209 ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...