Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employment Tribunal - Discrimination


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2066 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I was dismissed by my employer for misuse of a corporate credit card.

I had used it to help with cash flow for moving expenses since my employer wanted me to relocate and the costs were having a drain on my finances.

 

At the same time I was going through a stressful time at home with the break-up of my marriage.

When I used the card I didn't realise it was considered personal use, since in my mind I was moving for work, and I was eventually dismissed for it.

 

I've been seeing my GP for over a year with stress and anxiety and I think my decision to use the card was clouded by my mental health issues and inhibited decision making. My GP has diagnosed me with an anxiety disorder.

 

I've submitted my ET1 claim form for discrimination due to disability - mental health.

I had disclosed to my employer several times the impact the move and the finances were having on me and they took no note and made no reasonable adjustments.

 

The employer has hired a solicitor and they have submitted their ET3 defence and have asked the preliminary hearing is postponed and re-listed from a Case Management hearing to an Open Preliminary Hearing.

 

They deny that I was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act at the time of alleged discriminatory treatment.

 

They want the hearing to consider the issue of whether I am a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act at the time of alleged discriminatory treatment.

 

They also request the Tribunal make the following orders in advance of the Open Preliminary Hearing:

 

· Claimant to provide an impact statement

· Claimant to provide copies of his medical records

· Respondent to confirm whether a Join Medical Expert report is required

 

I need to firm up my argument that I am disabled under the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act.

My GP has diagnosed an anxiety disorder, but I am wondering what else I need to prepare for the examination by the respondents solicitor.

I can provide examples of the everyday activities that are impaired and have a diary of these event going back many months.

 

Also can someone tell me what the impact statement is I will be ordered to prepare?

 

I tried to get a solicitor but can't afford one, so have to represent myself.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally you need to show significant daily impact - that is what you describe in the impact statement - and that it is likely to go on for a long time, usually a year or more. So a lot of medical evidence, not just a generalist gp report, needed. Turning up to work instead of recognising you were too unwell to be there sadly doesn’t help .

 

If you aren’t sure you are in that category I would have a good think about the best way to avoid a reference citing fraudulent use of a credit card. The importance of that may depend on your line of work.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks!!! That is a great document. Very interesting read.

 

I am seeing my GP in a couple days to get a letter for the preliminary hearing.

 

Any help with the statement would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

They will be asking for a Disability Impact Statement. This does what it says on the tin. You would need to address the history of your illness, along with the impact it has upon you and especially with regards to normal day to day activities.

 

You also say the Respondent has "asked" for those matters. Have you replied? It would appear that this is a matter which would require a jointly instructed expert report given the minutia of detail which would be affected including the difficulties you had at the material time. Also when you say you advised you employer of the same did you do so in writing? If so I would provide copies to the court.

 

A lot depends on how you intend to fight the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not yet the deadline in in a couple weeks. I got a letter from my GP with the history of stress, leading to anxiety over the last 18-24 months. Are there any examples of impact statements? I was wondering how to write it and how much detail they need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to include as much detail as you can about how your health affects your normal day to day activities. If you think about the requirements of section 6 - then look at how to comply with it.

 

i.e. does the condition have a significant adverse impact upon your ability to undertake normal day to day activities? Housework counts in this respect as well. Then has it lasted or is expected to last a year.

 

I don't know if there are examples online this is a personal issue for each disabled person really.

 

you could consider titles such as:

 

History (when you first had symptoms, diagnosis time etc to show it is a year or more)

 

Factors which affect your disability (so if you drive too far, stress etc and the things that you cannot do i.e. I can't do housework, I struggle to cook and clean etc etc)

 

Management of the condition (i.e. what do you have to do to cope and of course setting out where such things do not enable you to undertake your normal day to day activities including what medication you may be on)

Link to post
Share on other sites

your critical relevant impact here is your ability to make sound decisions that are quite like the bad credit card decision. you're trying to show that was caused by a disability. How it affects your ability to wash or cook or drive, not so important to this specific case.

 

 

 

be aware that if you regularly need to use a credit card at work though, or make financial decisions, you could be shooting yourself in the foot by declaring yourself unable to make them and hence unemployable.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

your critical relevant impact here is your ability to make sound decisions that are quite like the bad credit card decision. you're trying to show that was caused by a disability. How it affects your ability to wash or cook or drive, not so important to this specific case.

 

 

 

be aware that if you regularly need to use a credit card at work though, or make financial decisions, you could be shooting yourself in the foot by declaring yourself unable to make them and hence unemployable.

you are conflating two positions - the first is being disabled and the disability impact statement. The second is that the disability affected the thought processes which are the subject of the disciplinary process, that is dealt with during witness statements ONCE you have proven you are disabled.
Link to post
Share on other sites

you are conflating two positions - the first is being disabled and the disability impact statement. The second is that the disability affected the thought processes which are the subject of the disciplinary process, that is dealt with during witness statements ONCE you have proven you are disabled.

 

fair point well made. but a disability that has no impact on mental processing is of limited use here.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes quite so. However it is a matter for the impact statement to say how the issue/condition affects the normal day to day activities. Being unable to undertake housework and cook for example can be due to cognitive issues - it is not only physical disabilities that can be affected in that way. I quite deliberately did not specify physical or mental impairment as that all can be covered in the impact statement where relevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...