Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employment Tribunal - Discrimination


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2060 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I was dismissed by my employer for misuse of a corporate credit card.

I had used it to help with cash flow for moving expenses since my employer wanted me to relocate and the costs were having a drain on my finances.

 

At the same time I was going through a stressful time at home with the break-up of my marriage.

When I used the card I didn't realise it was considered personal use, since in my mind I was moving for work, and I was eventually dismissed for it.

 

I've been seeing my GP for over a year with stress and anxiety and I think my decision to use the card was clouded by my mental health issues and inhibited decision making. My GP has diagnosed me with an anxiety disorder.

 

I've submitted my ET1 claim form for discrimination due to disability - mental health.

I had disclosed to my employer several times the impact the move and the finances were having on me and they took no note and made no reasonable adjustments.

 

The employer has hired a solicitor and they have submitted their ET3 defence and have asked the preliminary hearing is postponed and re-listed from a Case Management hearing to an Open Preliminary Hearing.

 

They deny that I was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act at the time of alleged discriminatory treatment.

 

They want the hearing to consider the issue of whether I am a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act at the time of alleged discriminatory treatment.

 

They also request the Tribunal make the following orders in advance of the Open Preliminary Hearing:

 

· Claimant to provide an impact statement

· Claimant to provide copies of his medical records

· Respondent to confirm whether a Join Medical Expert report is required

 

I need to firm up my argument that I am disabled under the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act.

My GP has diagnosed an anxiety disorder, but I am wondering what else I need to prepare for the examination by the respondents solicitor.

I can provide examples of the everyday activities that are impaired and have a diary of these event going back many months.

 

Also can someone tell me what the impact statement is I will be ordered to prepare?

 

I tried to get a solicitor but can't afford one, so have to represent myself.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally you need to show significant daily impact - that is what you describe in the impact statement - and that it is likely to go on for a long time, usually a year or more. So a lot of medical evidence, not just a generalist gp report, needed. Turning up to work instead of recognising you were too unwell to be there sadly doesn’t help .

 

If you aren’t sure you are in that category I would have a good think about the best way to avoid a reference citing fraudulent use of a credit card. The importance of that may depend on your line of work.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks!!! That is a great document. Very interesting read.

 

I am seeing my GP in a couple days to get a letter for the preliminary hearing.

 

Any help with the statement would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

They will be asking for a Disability Impact Statement. This does what it says on the tin. You would need to address the history of your illness, along with the impact it has upon you and especially with regards to normal day to day activities.

 

You also say the Respondent has "asked" for those matters. Have you replied? It would appear that this is a matter which would require a jointly instructed expert report given the minutia of detail which would be affected including the difficulties you had at the material time. Also when you say you advised you employer of the same did you do so in writing? If so I would provide copies to the court.

 

A lot depends on how you intend to fight the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not yet the deadline in in a couple weeks. I got a letter from my GP with the history of stress, leading to anxiety over the last 18-24 months. Are there any examples of impact statements? I was wondering how to write it and how much detail they need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to include as much detail as you can about how your health affects your normal day to day activities. If you think about the requirements of section 6 - then look at how to comply with it.

 

i.e. does the condition have a significant adverse impact upon your ability to undertake normal day to day activities? Housework counts in this respect as well. Then has it lasted or is expected to last a year.

 

I don't know if there are examples online this is a personal issue for each disabled person really.

 

you could consider titles such as:

 

History (when you first had symptoms, diagnosis time etc to show it is a year or more)

 

Factors which affect your disability (so if you drive too far, stress etc and the things that you cannot do i.e. I can't do housework, I struggle to cook and clean etc etc)

 

Management of the condition (i.e. what do you have to do to cope and of course setting out where such things do not enable you to undertake your normal day to day activities including what medication you may be on)

Link to post
Share on other sites

your critical relevant impact here is your ability to make sound decisions that are quite like the bad credit card decision. you're trying to show that was caused by a disability. How it affects your ability to wash or cook or drive, not so important to this specific case.

 

 

 

be aware that if you regularly need to use a credit card at work though, or make financial decisions, you could be shooting yourself in the foot by declaring yourself unable to make them and hence unemployable.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

your critical relevant impact here is your ability to make sound decisions that are quite like the bad credit card decision. you're trying to show that was caused by a disability. How it affects your ability to wash or cook or drive, not so important to this specific case.

 

 

 

be aware that if you regularly need to use a credit card at work though, or make financial decisions, you could be shooting yourself in the foot by declaring yourself unable to make them and hence unemployable.

you are conflating two positions - the first is being disabled and the disability impact statement. The second is that the disability affected the thought processes which are the subject of the disciplinary process, that is dealt with during witness statements ONCE you have proven you are disabled.
Link to post
Share on other sites

you are conflating two positions - the first is being disabled and the disability impact statement. The second is that the disability affected the thought processes which are the subject of the disciplinary process, that is dealt with during witness statements ONCE you have proven you are disabled.

 

fair point well made. but a disability that has no impact on mental processing is of limited use here.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes quite so. However it is a matter for the impact statement to say how the issue/condition affects the normal day to day activities. Being unable to undertake housework and cook for example can be due to cognitive issues - it is not only physical disabilities that can be affected in that way. I quite deliberately did not specify physical or mental impairment as that all can be covered in the impact statement where relevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...