Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
    • Have to attend the hearing and present evidence of his financial position (income & expenditure) and  statements ,and agree an acceptable payment plan with the judges guidance.  It will be a form of redetermination hearing as already stated.The court will not agree to bailiffs if the financials do not reflect it or assetts are minimal. They just want to determine his true affordable disposable monthly figure....which will not be £10.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance Question


tony3x
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2096 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Friend of mine had a limited company and his van is on finance in the name of the limited company. The V5 is in the name of the company but the insurance is in his personal name.

 

I don't think there is anything wrong there as you can insure (with owners permission) a vehicle that does not belong to you. but - the ltd company is now dissolved, he is still paying the finance.

 

How does he stand legally with regard the V5 being in the name of a dissolved company and the insurance in own name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As insurance certificates cover the vehicle with that registration number, and as it is the 'user' rather than the owner who is legally required to arrange insurance, it doesn't matter who owns it providing that the insurance company was fully notified of the situation when the policy was taken out and were happy with it. Were they? Did they know the V5C had the company name on it? Do they know that the company is now dissolved? He should tell them, they may consider it a material fact. Potentially there are complications if the legal owner and the insured aren't the same person and the vehicle is stolen or destroyed and the insurer agrees to pay a total loss. Who is entitled to receive the total loss payment?

 

 

I couldn't tell you exactly what the registered keeper rules say about having the dissolved company on the V5C but surely it needs to be transferred to your friends name?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checked.

The insurer is aware that the van is registered in the company name but not that the company has been dissolved. The finance company are also not aware that the company has been dissolved. The payout on a total loss is an interesting one and not sure who gets it, the registered keeper or the insured.

 

The whole thing is further complicated in that he is going through a divorce that is quite acrimonious so wants as little in his name as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The insurer is aware that the van is registered in the company name but not that the company has been dissolved. The finance company are also not aware that the company has been dissolved. The payout on a total loss is an interesting one and not sure who gets it, the registered keeper or the insured.

 

Or the finance company (to the extent of the outstanding finance anyway). Is their interest noted on the policy? It would depend if the finance was secured on or linked to the vehicle in some way, or whether it was just a personal loan.

 

If there were a total loss insurers would probably ask for evidence of ownership, particularly the purchase invoice. Who is shown as the purchaser on that? If it's only the now dissolved company then I'm not sure who they would pay. I don't know what the rules are for money owing to a dissolved company.

 

 

Do DVLA permit the registered keeper to be a legal entity that no longer exists? I don't know but it would seem unlikely to be permitted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot insure something which you have no financial intrest in.

 

I cannot insure my neighbours car but I can insure myself against a claim I I had an accident in it.

 

 

If the vehicle is in dissolved company's name then it should of been returned to lease company on date of dissolvent.

There is now potentially a minefield on technicality points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot insure something which you have no financial intrest in.

 

I cannot insure my neighbours car but I can insure myself against a claim I I had an accident in it.

 

 

If the vehicle is in dissolved company's name then it should of been returned to lease company on date of dissolvent.

There is now potentially a minefield on technicality points.

 

This is what I am concerned about. Its not a lease but full HP with not a lot owing. I have told him to clear the finance and then transfer to his name but the divorce has complicated things.

 

I am trying to help him get his 'house in order' so may have to delve deeper with this.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If no debts and the company compulsorily would up them the govt gets the money. The lease co will need to know about this and possibly others as well.. he could end up paying off the HP and still lose the van and wont be able to transfer the assets because he is no longer entitled to make those decisions. The insurer will wnat to know about this as they ahve to assess who owns the vehicle and who is "the insured". The wording of the policy will help him resolve this to some degree

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company was voluntarily closed as no longer needed to be Ltd, doing same job but as sole trader. The accountant that dissolved the company should have sorted this at the time. There were no debts, other than the van. It was only dissolved last year and closing accounts have not been produced yet as far as I know. I guess he could buy the van from the company for the value of the outstanding finance and clear the loan, or clear the loan and just change the V5 to personal name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

he should have done that at the time. if the comany is gone the the assets arent the company's to decide what to do with. I suspect that sorting this out propery will cost more than the van itself. He could ask the accountant what they ahve done with the asset and take it from there otherwise the van may belong to HMG or it may belong to finance co or may belong to shareholders (him)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All,

Just an update. As suggested it was complicated due to the finance and V5 being in the name of the limited company. Well all solved now as the van has been repo'ed with about £500 owing. Unfortunately due the Ltd company being dissolved they would not take payment - should have been done prior to dissolve (words with accountant I think). Friend not too fussed as van had over 100k on the clock and was starting to cost money. Also found out that the van had a charge against it due to unpaid parking fines - all in the name of the Ltd Co - hopefully these will now disappear as they are in the name of the company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...