Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shoplifted at Tesco. DWF letter


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2111 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you to everyone that replied! I’m in a similar situation. Just received my first letter from dwf asking for £125. The value of items I was caught shop lifting came to about £10. Was really afraid until I read everything here, and will ignore the letters!

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are not out of pocket,

 

put the letter to good use in an emergency then flush away! ignore ,. these companies usually get their up and commence in time, lock the Bxxxxtds up, they are chancxers and should be locked up/false representation comes to mind/

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

might be best to start a new thread

of your own freyr

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to everyone that replied! I’m in a similar situation. Just received my first letter from dwf asking for £125. The value of items I was caught shop lifting came to about £10. Was really afraid until I read everything here, and will ignore the letters!

 

Hi the worse thing is the worry, please ignore as it seems that you now only get the three letters in the space of a few months

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you!

it really is stressful, but reading through everyone’s responses and experiences helps ease the stress!

 

If the fine wasn’t so outrageous,

I was going to pay it,

because I know I was in the wrong,

 

but seriously,

£125 for security is just ridiculous!

 

Ok the bright side

even if my credit rating goes down for 6 years,

doesn’t matter,

by the time I graduate and earn enough for a deposit on a house,

decades will have gone by!

Link to post
Share on other sites

FINE!! no its NOT and can never be

credit rating...can never effect that...

which is why we suggest you start your own thread!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would your credit rating go down.......the numpties have no access to your credit rating.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG. I have taken the liberty of moving your posts (and replies) to a thread of its own. That we, we can give specific help and not confuse the other thread.

 

 

Well done for reading other threads and now knowing what will happen... Nothing, Nada, Zilch. All DWF can do is send letters, nothing more. They may be a solicitor group but in civil recovery cases of this sort, they are being very speculative about the money they claim Tesco are due.

 

 

They will not even be able to see your credit file unless you have given permission and even if you did, they could do very little to it. If by chance they do manage to do so, let us know but it's unlikely.

 

 

Were you given any paperwork by Tesco Security? Did you sign anything and if so, did you read it first?

 

 

Obviously look at why you did this and don't do it again.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look,

the money doesnt go to pay for security and companies like RLP and DWF charge the store for their services so they get paid twice.

 

how do you think they arrive at the figure of £125?

They made it up!

they wouldnt exist if people didnt feed them and then the stores would have to think about proper methods of crime reduction as the current model doesnt work.

 

When figures show that the guff put out about how these companies reduce pilfering etc is false they then changed their story so it is for recovering security costs.

 

When that was shown to be unture it is now to deter people from doing it twice because it is getting expensive..

 

Well, the druggies that get caught 6 times in a day dont seem to consider that point to be relevant or true, they are desperate and that means their behaviour isnt going to change because someone sent them a letter.

 

So, having your collar felt is probably the impetus you needed to change your ways and not the threat of a letter so in your case the work is done without the input of DWF or whoever so again they are pointless

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...