Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DRO cancelled due to UC back payment - is my Official Receiver correct - UC is not a disability benefit?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2073 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

The offical receiver has told me that he intends to cancel my DRO (3 weeks before it was due to finish) as I now have over £1000 in the bank due to a back payment of Universal Credit.

 

I have received this money because the DWP declared me unfit for work and work related activity following a work capacity assessment.

 

I was very surprised he did this as many benefit sites and advisors said that this would not happen because I had received this money due to my medical condition.

(Crohn's Disease)

 

I am in a full Universal Credit area and I have heard that this money would have been disregarded had I been claiming Pip or other sickness benefits with a disability premium.

 

I was wondering what the law is regarding this?

I went to see CAB and they managed to talk to the assistant to the official reciever

but he stonewalled and was arguing that because my benefit did not include the words disability premium they did not have to ignore it.

He also said that he did not want to reverse the decision in case it set a precedent!

 

Cab tried to argue that it was a disability PREMIUM, and sent me on a trip to my local benefit office to ask if I could get a letter stating this.

However they said that Universal Credit does not have a disability premium.

 

I asked a lot of people as to what would happen about this backdated money including Debt Camel, Step Change, Debtline and they were all wrong

 

I would like to know where the law stands since I think I am being given the shaft with the Insolvency Service using a play on words as an excuse to cancel my DRO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably a good thing

 

who said all of your debts within your DRO are enforceable...esp if you are paying any DCA's?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would I be paying a DCA during the duration of a DRO. Surely you know that during a DBO my debtors are not allowed to contact me?

 

I don't think that the Insolvency Service are up to speed on Universal Credit.

 

Either that or this is some new policy to help out the banks and credit card companies where everybody on Universal Credit who is still recieveing a payment for limited capacity for work and work related activity is being screwed over!

 

A lump sum from benefits back-dating

 

These may sound large but they are often not a problem because this treated as “income” over the period the back-dating relates to not “capital”.

 

The question is would you have exceeded the “spare income of £50” limit if you had been getting the correct amount of benefits all the time.

 

If the benefit is a claim for disability (PIP, DLA, AA) then an extra cost line for the disability would also be included in this re-calculation.

 

In 2018 the government is reviewing a lot of Pip awards

– if you get a backdated sum for this, it shouldn’t make a difference to your DRO as any disability benefits you receive should be offset with an expenses line labelled “adult care costs” or something similar. the net effect on your “disposable income” is then zero.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what I meant is were any of your debts sold to DCA's before you took out the DRO...did you check their enforceability first?

 

I've moved your thread to the benefits forum and slightly retitled it, you'll probably get better results here

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I don't know anything about DROs and so on, but UC (when paid on grounds of limited capability for work) and ESA are not "disability" benefits in the commonly understood sense. They are "income replacement" benefits.

 

Some benefits, such as PIP or DLA are paid to assist with the extra costs of disability. This is why the decision to award them (or not) is based on an assessment of the claimants care or mobility needs. UC and ESA are intended to cover the costs of daily living: food, bills etc - costs that everyone has to deal with. This is presumably what your OR is thinking of.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Antone has hit the nail on the head.

 

UC is a means tested benefit, as is ESA income related benefit. They are to provide income to meet daily living costs and count as income.

 

DLA and PIP are different so they would not be counted in the same way.

 

The OR is correct in their assessment, that the LCWRA backdating is additional income that had not been considered before,

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks,

thats what I was wondering about.

 

In that case it looks like there is nothing I can do, but I'm going to spend just over a third of my money on white goods, clothes, bedding, food, rent and other things that I need for the house.

 

I wont be buying flat screen TVs or computers but I will keep £700 just in case I need to go bankrupt at a later date and I will use about half of my benefit money to offer my creditors a final settlement of 18p in the pound of what I owe. If they refuse then I will have no option but to go bankrupt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, but the extra amount of Universal Credit that I receive was awarded after a work capacity assessment found that I was unfit to work because of my medical condition

.

I think this is just another case of smoke and mirrors from the Tories, just like when they changed the name of sick notes to fit notes.

 

Just because the benefit is not called disability benefit does not mean that it is not being given because of a disability or sickness which it clearly is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Limited Capability for Work and Work Related Activity element is awarded to those not capable of any work activity. It is additional income to help meet the increased cost of living that someone in this position might face. For example they might need to regularly attend Doctors or Hospital appointments. They might have extra costs to help them live their normal daily lifes.

 

In terms of backpay, I think the argument that you would make to the OR is that you have struggled to meet basic living costs over a period of time and what the consequences are. Demonstrate why this money is needed to help with your increased costs because of a disability.

 

I believe you can apply to the court to have this reviewed, but not sure of process.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, you hit the nail on the head, in that everyone I've taken this to, including all the big advice agencies have failed to mention how and if I could take this further.

 

I did over hear a conversation between my CAB advisor and a senior member of the insolvency service, and he said that he did not want to overturn the decision in case it set a precedent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I am in a full Universal Credit area and I have heard that this money would have been disregarded had I been claiming Pip or other sickness benefits with a disability premium.

 

Not quite, if you were not in a full Universal Credit area, you would be receiving ESA instead.

If during the DRO moratorium you received a backdated award of ESA while also receiving PIP, you might have received a backdated payment of Severe Disability Premiums or Enhanced Disability Premiums if you were eligible for either payment.

 

However, regarding the property limit for a DRO, it is only the amount of the backdated disability premiums which is disregarded and not the full ESA backdated payment. Where the backdated ESA payment minus any disability premiums is over the £1000 DRO property limit, the DRO would be cancelled as it has been in your case.

 

Regarding no disability premiums being awarded under Universal Credit, that is purposeful cut to disability benefits introduced by the Conservative government.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The back dated Universal Credit I recieved was for limited capacity for work and work related activity.

 

The fact that I was still able to recieve this over a year after it had been cancelled by the conservatives was because I first claimed Universal Credit eight months before the conservatives did away with this for sick people claiming Universal Credit.

 

The fact that it took over 21 months from when I first made my claim to me actually recieveing it is down to the conservatives and the D.O.W.P.s incompetence at rolling it out.

 

To be clear, if I had recieved this money after the 13 week assessment period, rather than waiting from 2016 to 2018 then my DRO would still be in force and I would not be looking at bankruptcy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The back dated Universal Credit I recieved was for limited capacity for work and work related activity. The fact that I was still able to recieve this over a year after it had been cancelled by the conservatives...

 

 

The limited capability for work and work related activity (LCWRA) component which existed as part of ESA still applies to Universal Credit. It is the limited capability for work (LCW) component which was scrapped for both new ESA claimants and UC claimants after 3 April 2017.

 

This cut the amount for (new) ESA and UC claimants deemed to have LCW by £29.05 per week. The £29.05 per week cut to LCW claimants is in addition to the disability premium cuts.

 

Your frustration is understandable but if you had been receiving the extra £29.05 per week when your DRO application was considered, that would have been counted as income towards the £50 per month DRO limit. You may still have been eligible for the DRO if that additional amount was incorporated in to expenses.

 

I don't agree with your DRO being cancelled but it's correct where the sum you have received is a backdating of your LCWRA component and is over £1000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your frustration is understandable but if you had been receiving the extra £29.05 per week when your DRO application was considered, that would have been counted as income towards the £50 per month DRO limit. You may still have been eligible for the DRO if that additional amount was incorporated in to expenses.

 

 

That should not read £29.05 but the amount you receive as part of the LCWRA component so £X amount whatever that is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I submitted a new budget to the OR which included the extra £328 for limited capacity for work and work related activity about 4 hours before I found out that the D.O.W.P. was going to give me a backdated payment on the very same day and the OR excepted my new budget which I completed with the help of Step Change.

 

This is how I know that I would have been okay had I received this money over a period of time instead of recieveing a lump sum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I submitted a new budget to the OR which included the extra £328 for limited capacity for work and work related activity about 4 hours before I found out that the D.O.W.P. was going to give me a backdated payment on the very same day and the OR excepted my new budget which I completed with the help of Step Change.

 

This is how I know that I would have been okay had I received this money over a period of time instead of recieveing a lump sum.

 

Before this lump sum was paid, did you owe any previous debts to DWP, HMRC or Council Tax ?

 

If so, any lump sum created is normally offered towards the debts. But the DRO might have stopped such an action.

 

UC normally pay any backdated amount as a lump sum to the claimant, unless the amount can be offered against existing Government debt.

 

If you want to fight this, you really need advice from someone that offers legal advice on disability benefits and debt. Have a search online for organisations that might be able to assist you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I submitted a new budget to the OR which included the extra £328 for limited capacity for work and work related activity about 4 hours before I found out that the D.O.W.P. was going to give me a backdated payment on the very same day and the OR excepted my new budget which I completed with the help of Step Change.

 

This is how I know that I would have been okay had I received this money over a period of time instead of recieveing a lump sum.

 

 

If you receive notice that the DRO has been revoked, you can challenge the revocation on these grounds, although you should speak to your DRO adviser or approved intermediary before dong so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...