Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2111 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

I wonder if you could offer advice please

 

Jbw enforcement agent appeared at my home this morning looking for my 21 year old son.

 

I did not open the door no will i.

 

Son is not here at the moment but i do have a bed wardrobe ect in my dinning room for him to use if he was to be here

- no belonging other then some clothes and odd toiletries and no car in his name.

 

Notice just says enforcement for warrant £616

And a ref number .

 

phoned son who told me to open his mail and discovered letters about non payment of dart charge from march this year.

 

2x £115 one of the numbers matches the number on the enforcement notice the other does not

 

Whats the best way to proceed from here please ?

 

Are they likely to try and take goods from my home ?

 

Should son contact the bailiff with a offer ?

Edited by honeybee13
Font size
Link to post
Share on other sites

No powers of entry.

Its not magistrates fines.

They cannot take anything of yours.

If they turn up let them do HPI checks and DVLA cecks on your cars no matter how much they spit there dummies out.

 

Have a good parent son chat.

Old enough to drive, old enough to sort finances out

 

One question

Who's car was he driving at the time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes his bottom has been kicked sadly as hes dyslexic he does tend not to open his flipping letters sticks his head in the sand

.It was his car that was scrapped around the same time.

 

Is there any way forward with this to resolve it ?

Should he just start to pay what he can afford to the debt agency while ignoring the bailiff ?

 

Would i need to show proof that its our home and not his ?

Not a problem but id just like to know what

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant ignore the bailiffs as a warrant has been issued.

Best thing is to get an arrangement to pay before they do a personal visit. This will save him money.

 

If they do visit you can show them your id and explain its your son but they will try to gain peaceful entry, so lock your doors behind you.

 

They will try to get you to pay it, being bank of mum and dad but it depends what sort of stance you want to take with your son.

Personally id make him pay it regardless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was a personal visit allready many charges on top The bank of mum will not be paying because a ,i cant afford to and b, its not my flaming debt

 

 

However i know he hasnt got this kind of money and that the bailiff is unlikely to accept what he can offer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the charges are set in legislation and now form part of the fine.

 

I take it he does not live with you so let them trace him to his own address.

 

Sometimes they need to stand up on their own feet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give the bailiff your sons address and prove he isn't at your house. Then let the bailiff deal with it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

 

Son is not here at the moment but i do have a bed wardrobe ect in my dinning room for him to use if he was to be here- no belonging other then some clothes and odd toiletries and no car in his name.

 

Notice just says enforcement for warrant £616

And a ref number .Phoned son who told me to open his mail and discovered letters about non payment of dart charge from march this year.

 

2x £115 one of the numbers matches the number on the enforcement notice the other does not. Should son contact the bailiff with a offer ?

 

As you son has only just become aware of the Dart Charge (because he is living elsewhere), then the simplest solution is for him to submit two Dart Charge Out of Time witness statements to the Traffic Enforcement Centre. He will need to provide a postal address on the forms (presumably where he is now living).

 

On the forms he will need to provide the Penalty Charge Number (which for Dart Charge will start with IA (or possibly IB) and be followed by 8 numbers. He will need to explain that he only became aware of the penalties yesterday when he was contacted by his mother after a bailiff visited her address. In relation to the vehicle and address on DVLA records, I would suggest that your son states on the forms that the vehicle involved in the crossings was scrapped a short while after using the crossing. He is has any evidence, he should provide it.

 

If he submits the forms before 4pm today (by email) they will be processed today and in almost all cases, bailiff enforcement will be placed on hold sometime tomorrow morning. The 'hold' will be in place for around 4-6 weeks. If accepted, and depending on whether he has received a previous penalty charge notice, the charge will be reduced to either £2.50 or £37.50. All bailiff fees will be removed.

 

PS: I would suggest that on the form your son mention that he is 21 years of age and is dyslexic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I should have mentioned that if your son only has one Penalty Charge Notice number, he will need to call Highways England to get the number for the second crossing. Their telephone number is 0300 300 0120. He needs to wait on the line to speak with an operator. It is during the call that many of my clients discover that there are other unpaid Dart Charges !!! If so, he needs to ask for the reference numbers. He should ask what stage of enforcement they are at (Charge Certificate, Order for Recovery or warrant stage).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...