Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1948 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you.

 

I need Respondent to disclose proceedings of the similar case to prove inconsistency of my treatment. However, as they can say it is confidential information, how can I do that? I already asked them to disclose that information but they did not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Proceedings as in a Tribunal Claim? If you have matters which are relevant to proceedings then you can make an application for an order to disclose it.

 

It helps if you have asked them 2-3 times for the information and set say a 7 day deadline for response then at the 7 day point on failure send the chaser.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Internal proceeding related to my case.

 

You need to be more specific. Exactly what do you think exists? You will need to identify what documents you say exist when asking the Respondent to disclose them then the ET. You will also need to state how/why those documents are relevant in order to obtain any order for disclosure (you can of course note that cost to the Respondent is NOT a consideration when it comes to disclosure).

 

Simply put you need to be accurate. Anything else will be seen as a fishing exercise and will not be given.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

I need Respondent to disclose proceedings of the similar case to prove inconsistency of my treatment. However, as they can say it is confidential information, how can I do that? I already asked them to disclose that information but they did not reply.

 

In a Court (Tribunal) action, there is no confidentiality The Judge would ask to see the document and decide if it is confidential I believe they would have to disclose it

 

Have you submitted a Discrimination Questionnaire?

 

The other side doesn't need to respond but it is still a good idea to ask

 

See this website

 

 

http://www.guildhallchambers.co.uk/uploadedFiles/Howtowinadirectdiscriminationcase_SS.pdf

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Update:

Respondent's solicitor is playing unethically . Witness statements are to be sent by 1 November 2018 . However, they still temper with the hearing bundle. So, i don't have the final hearing bundle and can not , in my witness statement, refer to any page or document from the bundle.

 

I requested omitted pages to be added, some to be replaced as it is illegible. What they did, is to make new bundle which have only asking documents ( not all ) and they omitted now allllllll my evidence, put just their. It is so unfair and stress me out. I emailed them now that if they don't send me final bundle I will prepare supplementary bundle pages. Please tell me what claimants do in this cases , when respondent obviously omit and not taking claimant's evidence in the bundle?

 

Another question:

You told me to make subject access request , which I will definitely after witness statement's exchange , seeing how unethically they behave. I am asking who from i have to request that ? From Respondent's solicitor or from Respondent ( company ) directly ?

 

Thank you .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make the SAR directly to the company itself Make it clear that you would consider it an act of victimization if they delay and/or fail to release your personal data

 

 

Regarding the omitted documents, make your own supplementary Bundle However, you can make another request for the documents to be included

 

 

Copy the Tribunal into your request

Edited by honeybee13
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

@ Dondana . Thank you very much.

They sent me finally agreed bundle pdf.

 

I have to exchange witness statements soon. I have one witness. I want to ask, can I refer to points made in witness statement of mine, even if it still is not in the bundle?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Make the SAR directly to the company itself Make it clear that you would consider it an act of victimization if they delay and/or fail to release your personal data

 

 

Regarding the omitted documents, make your own supplementary Bundle However, you can make another request for the documents to be included

 

 

Copy the Tribunal into your request

 

I am writing SAR, found template on https://www.workingfamilies.org.uk/articles/2686/ . It says at the end 'within one month' which is later than my hearing. Can I write until the hearing? Give them 10 days?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What points are you seeking to refer to? If there are additional documents you can append them to your WS and refer to them that way.

 

I want to refer to a statement of alleged victim they have not included in the bundle, but of which I was accused, for reason that 'victim' did not give a consent for that to be given to me/ notes to be released to me.

 

I also want to refer to another process that would show that my disciplinary process was flowed. Namely, they engaged another, independent person to chair a grievance ( not even disciplinary ) , whilst my disciplinaries were started chaired, investigated and decided by one person.

 

I also want information that another coworker's mental disability is taken into account for giving a lesser action/ sanction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

We exchanged witness statements. One of respondent's witness is the main person who heard my appeal. It witness statement , in my view is absolutely inadmissible. Comments, opinions, arguments, reference to evidences of other witness . referring to what I said ( of course wrongly ) but not giving any evidence ( no notes of the hearing in the bundle) , and not referring to any evidence in the bundle. I read that should point to judge to exclude such witness statement as evidence, can I ? It would be waste of time to cross examine the person. The person gave its decision, and now in the witness statement is 'explaining' the decision , which already was given. Not even giving reference to that decision.

 

As for the expert witness report regarding my disability, Respondent enquired , it is confirming my point, that i have had been mentally challenged at the time of disciplinary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you can determine that someone's statement is inadmissible

 

You should start writing the questions you are going to ask If the witness statement is devoid of details, you should ask questions so as to provide details to the Tribunal The other side always tries to give as little information as possible

 

It is your job to ask the right question to get to the root of the matter It is your job to ask the right questions to reveal the facts the other side is trying to conceal It is not so difficult but you need to be sure of your destination and think of how to ask the right question to lead to there

 

I see it as a positives when someone gives little info It gives me the opportunity to dictate the direction of the questioning

 

Start writing your questions now

Edited by Andyorch
Paras/Quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomorrow was the hearing 10 am. However, I 've got email from tribunal now , 15.12 that case os not ready for the hearing and tomorrow will be a preliminary to decide on my disability .

I handed gp letter on the first ! disciplinary , ( final warning) , nothing was done, not even mentioned, neither on the final warning nor in the dismissal. I claimed disability adjustments. They denied it . Asked for independent expert to give a statement. Expert indeed confirmed that I am disable as to act. I received the statement through bundle. Never sent to me as independent review. Never pointed to as the expert statement. Now, some judge sent me email to come tomorrow , instead to hearing to another preliminary hearing! to decide on my disability !!!!!! Please tell me is this normal , as I don't see it normal. And if it is normal , tell me why it is normal. Judge hired 3 ! hours

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomorrow was the hearing 10 am. However, I 've got email from tribunal now , 15.12 that case os not ready for the hearing and tomorrow will be a preliminary to decide on my disability .

I handed gp letter on the first ! disciplinary , ( final warning) , nothing was done, not even mentioned, neither on the final warning nor in the dismissal. I claimed disability adjustments. They denied it . Asked for independent expert to give a statement. Expert indeed confirmed that I am disable as to act. I received the statement through bundle. Never sent to me as independent review. Never pointed to as the expert statement. Now, some judge sent me email to come tomorrow , instead to hearing to another preliminary hearing! to decide on my disability !!!!!! Please tell me is this normal , as I don't see it normal. And if it is normal , tell me why it is normal. Judge hired 3 ! hours

 

The Judge wants to know if you are disabled according to the Equality Act 2010

Take your GP's letter

Also, a question a Judge would ask is the Impact Statement

Impact Statement is simply for you to tell how your disability affects you on a day to day basis

Another issue is that you need to go back to the Respondent's defence

What did they say?

That's where most of the questions would come from

I believe they are going for a technical knock out

You would need to step up if you are to scale through

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
The Judge wants to know if you are disabled according to the Equality Act 2010

Take your GP's letter

Also, a question a Judge would ask is the Impact Statement

Impact Statement is simply for you to tell how your disability affects you on a day to day basis

 

Yes, Judge ordered Impact Statement, and postponed main hearing until next year. Disability will be decided at main.

I not only have GP letter, but also independent expert statement , also about my day to day activities.

 

Another issue is that you need to go back to the Respondent's defence

What did they say?

That's where most of the questions would come from

I believe they are going for a technical knock out

You would need to step up if you are to scale through

Respondent did not say too much in witness statements.

Their defence is that they acted reasonable, and procedure was fair.

Please explain 'technical knock out' and 'scale through' ?

 

Next week there will be telephone conference with Judge whether to offer judicial mediation. Is this important ? Or is it like with ACAS negotiations?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, Judge ordered Impact Statement, and postponed main hearing until next year. Disability will be decided at main.

I not only have GP letter, but also independent expert statement , also about my day to day activities.

 

 

Respondent did not say too much in witness statements.

Their defence is that they acted reasonable, and procedure was fair.

Please explain 'technical knock out' and 'scale through' ?

 

Next week there will be telephone conference with Judge whether to offer judicial mediation. Is this important ? Or is it like with ACAS negotiations?

 

 

What was postponed? s it the Preliminary Hearing that was postponed or the Full Merit Hearing? It is important as it would determine how you prepare

 

Also, did you make the SAR again?

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry for not replying earlier, just saw your message.

Full merit hearing is postponed.

 

I have mediation now.

 

Yes, I made SAR, they responded,

 

lot of information is missing.

 

also I suspect they falsified some documents.-modified them now to adduce the case against me.

 

they redacted(blacked out) lot of text .

 

they used exemptions - legal privilege - with HR services -in my view it is not reason for exemption ,

and negotiations ? - this is unclear to me ,

are acas and judicial mediations - the negotiations under the term of DPA for SAR exemption? or dpa relates to settlements during employment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Mediation is when a judge (or similarly qualified person) tries to settle the case

S/he would also look at he merit of your case

Finally, I don't think the other side falsified any document

They may have concealed some document but they didn't falsify any

Please don't make such allegation before a judge as that puts them off

Edited by Andyorch
Quote unnecessary
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...