Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax Shortfall After Repo - Moorcroft Chasing +10yrs later!! - SAR time??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2118 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

For the past 10 years I have had various dca's/solicitors pursuing me for a mortgage shortfall debt after a repo in 1998.

.I naively left the house after an ex partner said he would be able to afford to pay on his own.

 

.the house got repo'd a few years down the line and as it was his fault he agreed to sort the debt out.

.he started a payment plan and I had no contact from any dca etc..

 

.that was till about 10 years ago when I started to receive letters again and found out that my ex had left the country(Australia I believe) and had obviously stopped payments..now I am left saddled with the debt.

 

.all I have had is letters showing the original debt and debt as it stands..

I have never in the 20 years years since the repo seen a full breakdown of how the debt was calculated

..is it too late to SAR the bank in question as I read you only have 6 years to appeal the debt??

 

Also I would would like people's thoughts on dealing with this matter.

it's been hanging over me for so long and causing a great deal of stress.

 

.the last thing I want is it to end up in court and have to pay a sum each month that I can't afford.

.I did email the dca(moorcroft) about a month ago saying I wasn't in a position to pay anything due to financial circumstances and having no assets and live in rented accommodation.they have now sent a I and e form to send back which I haven't done..

 

.any advice on what to do next will be greatly appreciated.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

No it's not too late to send an SAR and you send it to the original creditor. In principle mortgage debts do not expire until 12 years after the last Miss payment. In practice the debts not recoverable after six years. Have you any idea when the last payment was made?

 

It may have been a mistake to write to them. Did you acknowledge or admit the debt in any way?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last payment would have been about 10 years ago when he left the country

.i have made no payments and the only contact I've made is to email them about a month ago explaining my financial circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DON'T email them from now on.

 

 

Whatever they wish to convey can be committed in writing.

 

 

WHO is this DCA?

 

 

Keep EVERYTHING in writing, no phone calls or email.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moorcroft..can they still pursue me for this debt as it's been 10 years since last payment was made

Why has the debt just being passed from one dca/solicitors to another

I've had threats of court proceedings but they never materialise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha ha ha ha, Moorcr@p, the bottom of the barrel!!!!

 

 

What did their last empty threat letter claim?

 

 

You can seriously ignore these fools, the reason why it gets passed from pillar to post is simply because it's all a big money making scheme..These DCA's sell portfolio's of debts for millions to each other, where they pay as little as 6p in the pound for individual debts, they then chase those debtors for the full balance owing, even offering a discount to appear more reasonable, when in actual fact the debtor will be paying three or four times the true value of the account.

 

 

Moorcr@p, brilliant!! Ignore them until they send you anything in writing, and even then I doubt they'd have much to say.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think they own the debt as they state in the letters they are acting on behalf of the halifax.

they have only recently in the past few months taken the case on

so as of yet I have only been asked to get in touch to make a payment plan or discounted f and f payment which is a no no because I have no savings so no threats yet

 

so you think i should do nothing at the mo

 

I'm very worried that it will end in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Halifax have sent a whole portfolio of these old shortfall debts to Moorcroft to chase

 

you are safe to ignore the powerless DCA..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

its just Halifax trying to make some money.

 

I would assume that they are not aware of your correct address?

and Moorcroft are just sending phishing letters for mugs to fleece as they get a cut

 

original creditors do not do court

they'll see the debt on.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is It therefore inevitable that they sell the debt on??

 

And if the debt is sold on would I still be negotiate token payments or even a f and f settlement if I could raise the cash?

Link to post
Share on other sites

why?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why are you ever thinking you need to pay anything??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

because they will want money..and so will the company they sell it to wouldn't They? But then again I do wonder why they haven't already done so in the 10 years?? Are you saying it could just stop if I carry on ignoring?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it already has

this is simply what dca's do when they are employed to do so

did you read those other threads?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not as yet but will tomorrow as due to start work..

Will get back to you after I've read up on the threads if I have any more queries if you don't mind but thanks for you input so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:high5:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

..had a look at those threads and realised I had already seen them on previous visits to forum

(I have spent whole days scouring forums for suitable advice!).

 

.the advice you(and others) give is always very good but the one thing that's always seems to be sadly lacking in the threads is final outcome

 

.the only things I have surmised from reading the threads and your advice so far is that

1.dca can't do Jack!

2.original creditors will sell debt not take me to court.

 

For now I think it's quite safe to assume that I can ignore moorcroft till they go away.

i also think(if your advice is correct) that sometime in the near future they will sell the debt as it's been 10 years since last payment so is nearly at the end 12 years statue barred period..

 

what id like you to advise me on now if I've got anything to worry about IF the debt is indeed sold on?

How should I deal with them??

 

I would also like to ask at this point if it's any use sending halifax a SAR..

my thinking is that there's might be a chance that after 20 years after the actual repo they may not have the correct documentation to make the debt enforceable.

 

. your thought and advice will be very much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good work

 

Have you moved and halifax dont know your current address?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would sar them then

Lets them know where you are

And gets the info if if if they do anything

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should never run from debt!

Sar them .... 2 birds with one stone

Gets info

Updates address

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...