Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
    • I would say You should accept it - I HIGHLY doubt you will  be able to claim for letters at trial ans they’re offering you that, which is higher monetary value than interest.   Also they raise a good point, getting interest at anything above 4% is lucky these days, yes judges give it, but rarily above 4%   Also you might find depending on the judge  you don’t get some costs if you take it all the way over £7.40 when court woukdnt award letters costs and thus meaning their award would be less than evris offer which was made    Up to you though but the wait will be 3-4mo for a trial date at least
    • Hi Folks, Been 162 days! Just by way of update. Today I received a text from Opos Ltd so no doubt Capquest are renting the debt out to anybody who fancies a nibble. Safe to say I will not be responding.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

bank holiday time


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2109 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

its hopefully a quick query

 

recently we have had a communication at work (large company merged recently)

 

previously if we have worked a bank holiday (usually 10 hours) we have been paid time and a half for this and earnt time in leu - this has been 10 hours

 

recently we noticed that the hours for this hadnt been added, after alot of chasing we were told that they were now added at the start of the holiday year.

 

however we have only been granted 7.5 hours per bank holiday, their reasoning for has only just been given to us

 

copied below

 

---

 

To confirm a payroll week runs from Sunday to Saturday and the payroll team will process this accordingly, with this

in mind, certain rota’s will either work three or four days per week.

For the vast majority of our colleagues a full time working week is 37.5 hours per week, which equates to 1,950 hours

over the year (37.5 hours per week x 52 weeks in a year) – regardless of shift pattern. This includes the MyTime rota,

as additional hours worked are given in lieu time.

The standard contract template is 5 over 7, so holiday entitlement is calculated as 7.5 hours x the contractual number

of days entitlement for that colleague.

 

---

 

this would be fine if we WORKED 7.5 hours a bank holiday however we work between 10 and 11 hours on a bank holiday, even worse they have based the hours over a 5/7 contract

 

most of our workplace is on a 4on 4off rota, in my case im on flexible working and my current time is either 3 or 4 days in 7

 

we have asked for explanations but just keep being given the same details as above

 

we have also been told that if we want the days the business is closed off (christmas day etc) then we have to book it off, on asking if that means we have to give the 7.5 hours back we have been told that no we have to use 10/11 hours of holiday time

 

any advice?

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paid holiday is calculated on the number of hours a year you work but normally rationalised into days leave. You need to do your sums as to how may hours you work and how long the average day is and then check your leave entitlement they are saying you have against these figures. If your normal working day is 10 hours then that makes things simple, if you work an 8 hour day but do longer shifts at certain times then the hourly rate should apply.

 

Also, do you get paid on an hourly basis- agreed rate per hour- or as an annual/monthly salary that is then an average of 1/12th of a year.

using their sums they are admitting that there is an inbuilt error so you need to challenge this as a gropup rather than as individuals.

 

They are using days and not hours although they admit that hours are assumed for the working year. Urging will do no good, you need to present your figures and show why they are fairer and how they may keep the company away from a claim against them under the WTD.

 

Unions are good for this sort of collective head slapping of intransigent management. However, they also state that you get TOIL to correct certain errors so again is this what actually happens? if it is the you are starting a fight with yourself

Edited by Andyorch
Paras and typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

The time in leu is in our contract that if we work a bank holiday we get time and a half and a day in leu

 

If we don't work it as a scheduled day off then we simply get the day in leu

 

Most peoples shifts are either 11.5 hours or 10.5 minus a half hour lunch so 10/11

 

Mine are always 10 hours due to flex time

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry didn't ge time to finish questions

 

Ours is a salaried basis based on year devided by 13

 

I will have a look at their sums and rerun them

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

latest from work below

 

one of our Coordinators, has agreed to take on the job of collating all questions from all colleagues about the holiday issues and has committed to getting answers from as far up the corporate HR ladder as it is necessary to go. This will produce a comprehensive FAQ to help all of us.

 

In the interim, the easiest way to think of the new policy is, if you work 4 on and 4 off you should no longer think of your annual leave in days but think of it in hours. Whatever your shift, 4 on 4 off, 5 over 7, 5 over 8 or whatever combination of hours, your contracted hours are 1950 per year, or 37.5 per week. So, whether you work a bank holiday or have the day off, the only hours to be spent or accrued in the legal sense is 7.5 hours.

 

Yes, those of us who would normally work an 11.5-hour day will be losing out on the 4 hours that we had been receiving previously, but remember that those 4 hours were hours that we were not entitled to.

The company legal team have told us that the changes must happen to ensure compliance with the law.

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are salaried then the actual working day isnt that relevant as long as the working year is correct. If they are saying that a bank holiday only eats up 7.5 hours of your accrued holidy hours then that is good but if they are saying a day off on a BH uses up 11.5 hours because that is your NORMAL working day that is bad and you need to get them to stick to the actual hours used, even if it produces some odd results. Being paid extra for a BH is a bonus if your salary doesnt change in a normal 4 week cycle

 

I never used to gte paid bank holidays when I worked them and others didnt because I got paid £xxk per year and any extra hours were just part of the luxury of having that particular role for which I was paid quite well. You need to look at the overall picture and if you arent losing out (other than TOIL above 1 for 1) in the new scheme it isnt worth arguing over. If you are having to work longer than others or what you did before to keep you normal holiday entitlement then that is worth taking up because the assumptions of the working day may well reduce your annual salary if they start to tinker with the hours even more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...