Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2050 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I have been reading a lot of threads on here which all say to ignore RLP letters.

I have done so far but am now worried sick.

I am past the 21 days it gave me to respond.

 

I got one a few weeks ago after being stopped by security for switching tags in a store and also returning an item that I did buy from TK Maxx but not on that day as I had lost the receipt for it.

 

Bought a similar item that I liked better that was the same price and returned the original one - stupidly justifying in my mind that I was still paying so I wasn't stealing re the tag switching and yes I know that I was and I also know that that it was fraud.

 

The letter I received from RLP is a Letter Before Claim - it says there are no losses due to fraudulent refund transactions not recovered and £150 to cover time etc - total £150 owed.

 

Having read quite a few forum posts it seems it is worse to do a label switch than to steal an item... and I am not proud of what I did.

 

I have also returned the wrong items in the past too (new TK Maxx items that I had bought and was unsure about keeping - then the receipt return date had expired so I bought another and then returned as above but didn't get stopped on those occasions).

 

I am obviously banned from TK Maxx and 100% appreciate that things could have been a lot worse as the security staff didn't call the police at the time

 

. I could have had a criminal record....

 

I am also relieved that I was stopped because I became a total shopaholic at the fine old age of 52 since I split up with my wife a few years ago and I truly needed to stop.

 

Since this incident, I have stopped wasting hours wandering around stores and buying stuff I don't need - so I am thinking that the £150 fine is a small amount to pay to have stopped this mindless shopping.

 

A friend I confided in also has convinced me to make an appointment with my doctor as she thinks I am depressed and using shopping to replace my wife... , I will do this.

 

But @Maxxer as all holding rooms have audio and video and I admitted what I did (switching tags and returning wrong item) would it be better to just pay the RLP letter?

 

Did you mean on a comment on another thread you made that they would need to get another fraudulent return by me after this incident (which I won't do) and then they can make a case or will they go back on previous purchases/returns on my card and then get the police involved?

 

I suppose I am asking if I pay would that be the end of it or would it be the end of it anyway unless I go back into TK Maxx again? I hope this makes sense.

 

I am sorry this is so long but thanks for reading. From one idiotic man who has made stupid mistakes not thinking about the consequences and now worried sick.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please stop creating your own misery.

 

IGNORE the silly letters from RLP, they are nothing more than Santas Christmas lists, there is NOTHING they can do.

 

DO NOT pay these crooks a single penny, the items were returned, there was no loss to anyone which makes these stupid letters from RLP pointless, just throw them in the bin.

 

Go and get an appointment with your GP and explain to him what has been going on, it isn't easy losing someone, and I think you need to discuss this with your GP, and ignore RLP, they most definitely do not matter one iota!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not a fine!!

 

Ignore RLP

 

Go see you doc

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks I am making myself anxious constantly thinking about this :sad:

 

 

It'll soon pass, give it a few days, once you realise that the whole country isn't watching you you'll wind down.

 

 

I was caught earlier this year, and whilst the paranoia was through the roof, I still go and shop in the same store now, even after having a 'lifetime ban', in the grand scheme of things there are far more serious issues in this world other than switching labels and poxy TKmaxx.

 

 

Above all else, no-one died! :thumb:

 

 

Get that appointment booked with your GP,!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG.

 

 

 

You have a good friend who has advised you to see your GP. This is the first thing that struck me when I read the your first post above. I do know from personal experience that the world can seem to crash around us when one partner in a marriage leaves. In my case, it was also my wife. It wouldn't have been so bad but she left me for someone who was drop dead ugly :oops:

 

 

Your GP has probably seen this all before and won't be too surprised by this event. If you do get prescribed anti depressants (hereafter called Happy Pills), make sure that you take them as the effects can take two to three weeks to get into your system..

 

 

You have probably seen many of the other threads and the advice has always been to ignore. This Letter Before Claim is nothing of the sort. RLP can issue them even though they are thoroughly misleading but ONLY TKMaxx can take court action against you and the problem for them is that they would then have to justify the amount claimed. TKMaxx security staff are not paid by results and they get paid as employees of the company. Being staff members may mean that they get a higher wage but for a claim to succeed, they will have to prove the loss. They can't.

 

 

Another reason that court action is very unlikely is that it would be in the small claims court and as such the costs are fixed and it would cost the company far more than they could ever get back so it's a complete waste of time doing so.

 

 

The advice you have had to ignore is good advice (in my opinion) as no company that I have heard of in the last six years has taken anyone to court [ not including one store that backed out before court]

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks it was about 6 weeks ago and I was ignoring the letter I'm past the 21 days to respond so am sure I will get another letter soon then I started reading the posts about checking past transactions etc and got into a panic

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't and can't check it. Ignore rlp and any dca completely. The letters are full of junk and designed to break you down into paying

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

 

 

We don't normally remove threads unless there are legal reasons for this. Your username is completely anonymous and nobody has any idea who you are or where you are, so I don't think you have a problem.

 

 

RLP aren't part of the legal system, they can't do anything to you. :)

 

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they cant trace you

And there is nothing they can do to you even if they could anyway

Totally powerless

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst you cannot be traced from any postings here, RLP do occasionally look at these threads. It matters not one iota. I could make statements that I stole this and that but RLP won't have a clue who I am.

 

 

Try not to worry. None of what you have posted will make any difference to RLP as they can still do nothing.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another reason why they can’t trace you: their indiscriminately issuing of letter confetti.

If they only issued a few of these letters they MIGHT be able to work it out.

But they don’t. Their “business model” is to issue loads, that way only a small percentage have to fall for their “demands” for it to be worth it to them.

 

Yet, that works for you. They’ll have issued so many letters they want have a clue which one is the one you are posting about, so they can’t link it back to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
I didn't get any Bailiffs letters (yet?) and I ignored all three.

 

 

You WON'T get ANY BAILIFF letters, that is a complete myth, don't confuse BAILIFFS with powerless debt collectors.

 

 

Well done for ignoring these fools.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW! Sorry I missed this (been a bit poorly recently) This is a MAJOR change. RLP used to be the first company that TKMaxx went to but it seems RLP weren't having the effect that TKMaxx wanted so they have dumped them. That is EXCELLENT news. The more stores that do this, the sooner this shady company folds.

 

 

While I still abhor these silly games, it seems DWF only send three letters then stop which is better for the (alleged) shoplifter as they can them put the issue to bed. I would love to hear if anyone hears further from DWF after the three letters or whether a debt collector gets involved.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW! Sorry I missed this (been a bit poorly recently) This is a MAJOR change. RLP used to be the first company that TKMaxx went to but it seems RLP weren't having the effect that TKMaxx wanted so they have dumped them. That is EXCELLENT news. The more stores that do this, the sooner this shady company folds.

 

 

While I still abhor these silly games, it seems DWF only send three letters then stop which is better for the (alleged) shoplifter as they can them put the issue to bed. I would love to hear if anyone hears further from DWF after the three letters or whether a debt collector gets involved.

 

 

Just phoned and checked with a current lp employee, tk’s Are indeed still using rlp, not anyone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW! Sorry I missed this (been a bit poorly recently) This is a MAJOR change. RLP used to be the first company that TKMaxx went to but it seems RLP weren't having the effect that TKMaxx wanted so they have dumped them. That is EXCELLENT news. The more stores that do this, the sooner this shady company folds.

 

 

While I still abhor these silly games, it seems DWF only send three letters then stop which is better for the (alleged) shoplifter as they can them put the issue to bed. I would love to hear if anyone hears further from DWF after the three letters or whether a debt collector gets involved.

 

Sorry I think I confused things - my letters were from DWF (Tesco) - was just saying what I'd received then they stopped to the OP who said his were from RLP (TK Maxx)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...