Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
    • Isnt there some indication in there of at least intent to inform arbuthnot? IF he wasn't then it would seem to be Vennells decision to keep him 'uninformed .. Although seems to me if arbuthnot was unaware - he was either incompetent or should have very detailed records of denials. Seems vennells is constantly at the core of all the lying about all these issues though.
    • Paywalled/subscribe HB I'm unaware of the details on this HB but why is it a potential taxpayer burden? Hasn't a judge already ruled port has rights of access - so shouldn't costs be on the private company (South Tees Development Corporation) trying to change established access?     LIVE: High Court updates as CEO gives evidence in access rights row between STDC and PD Ports - Teesside Live WWW.GAZETTELIVE.CO.UK The face-off between the Teesport operator and Mayor Ben Houchen's South Tees Development Corporation continues in the High Court  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC Jersey SAR


JibTeenuc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2095 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

 

I'm planning to send a SAR to HSBC on behalf of a friend who holds a credit card, a current account, a savings account and a loan account with them.

 

 

My friend lives in Jersey, where all dealings with HSBC have been conducted.

 

 

Can anyone please confirm if a single SAR is sufficient to cover all of the above accounts and the correct address to which it should be forwarded, given the location being Jersey and I am unsure whether or not banks fall under the same legal jurisdiction and share the same administration offices as do those in the UK, or are classed as separate entities?

 

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure one essay I will be fine and you simply need to address it to any HSBC office in Jersey – even to his/her branch. Make sure the SAR asks for all personal data in respect of any matter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes no odds ain hsbc ad is fine see the address sticky on this forums homepage [Where you clicked post a new thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure one essay I will be fine and you simply need to address it to any HSBC office in Jersey – even to his/her branch. Make sure the SAR asks for all personal data in respect of any matter

 

 

 

That's fantastic to learn, so thank you.

 

 

I've taken a look at the updated GDPR template and I note it doesn't say "If you are not the person to whom this SAR should be addressed, please forward it to that department" (or similar) as a SAR used to. Is that because it is no longer necessary, or do you think I should include it...... just in case?

 

 

The ICO appears to be giving with one hand whilst taking away with the other, in general respect to the updated rules, it would appear.

 

 

Each side will be trying to wrestle these amendments to their advantage.

 

 

Thanks, again.

 

 

Jib

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes no odds ain hsbc ad is fine see the address sticky on this forums homepage [Where you clicked post a new thread

 

 

Thanks.

 

 

I was just unsure as the date for that sticky is 2007 (over 10 years ago, so I wasn't sure if it was up to date) plus, I was concerned addresses on the Mainland and in Jersey might differ but it seems the new GDPR has prevented the bank's claiming incorrect addresses.

 

 

Then again..... I'm not sure the GDPR has any jurisdiction in Jersey, anyway.

 

 

We make our own laws, here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jersey isn't in the EU and isn't part of the UK so EU and UK data protection laws don't apply there, nor does the UK Information Commissioner have any powers in Jersey

 

But Jersey normally adopts local laws that mirror EU/UK ones and from a quick look at the website of the Jersey Information Commissioner that's what they've done with GDPR, with a new Jersey data protection act coming into force May 25th, same day as GDPR started here.

 

https://oicjersey.org/data-protection-new-law/

 

Do some research on the Jursey ICO site about SARs. I pretty confident it'll be the same as in UK although template wording may need tweaking to refer to Jersey law. This page, for example

 

https://www.oicjersey.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Infographic-Your-Information-Rights-Series-2-Right-to-Subject-Access-general.pdf

 

Your Jersey friend would send it to HSBC Jersey. HSBC Jersey is a wholly separate legal entity to HSBC UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for such detailed and valuable information.

 

 

As I am also minded to submit SARs to banks and other financial institutions with whom I have dealt over the years, I am guessing the same will apply to those in that I should address my SAR(s) to their local offices, rather than their UK ones.

 

 

One, though, troubles me.

 

 

I undertook a mortgage with NatWest a number of years ago and pretty much all of the correspondence I received from them was sent from their Isle-of-Man offices - although all my interviews were conducted here, in Jersey.

 

 

I guess I should send it to the Jersey office and let them figure out whose in-tray to deposit it in.

 

 

 

 

Jersey isn't in the EU and isn't part of the UK so EU and UK data protection laws don't apply there, nor does the UK Information Commissioner have any powers in Jersey

 

But Jersey normally adopts local laws that mirror EU/UK ones and from a quick look at the website of the Jersey Information Commissioner that's what they've done with GDPR, with a new Jersey data protection act coming into force May 25th, same day as GDPR started here.

 

https://oicjersey.org/data-protection-new-law/

 

Do some research on the Jursey ICO site about SARs. I pretty confident it'll be the same as in UK although template wording may need tweaking to refer to Jersey law. This page, for example

 

https://www.oicjersey.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Infographic-Your-Information-Rights-Series-2-Right-to-Subject-Access-general.pdf

 

Your Jersey friend would send it to HSBC Jersey. HSBC Jersey is a wholly separate legal entity to HSBC UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are in Jersey and dealt with Jersey financial institutions they will all be independent legal entities from the UK companies. Jersey is a separate legal jurisdiction. Address all SARs to the Jersey company you dealt with.

 

 

 

Isle of Man is different. It also is not in EU or UK but normally adopts IoM laws that mirror EU/UK law in matters like this. I've haven't done any research but my guess is IOM will also have put a new data protection into force which you will use to submit a SAR to an IOM bank. A bit of research should soon show you what the current IOM DP law is and how to submit a SAR. Again I'd think the UK SAR template will be fine to use with some tweaking to refer to IOM law. IOM banks are typically legally separate from both UK and Jersey banks, so send your SAR to the IOM bank who gave you the mortgage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you're probably right in that, although I took out the mortgage in Jersey and dealt with NatWest Jersey staff on a face-to-face basis, the mortgage appears to have been issued by and administered through their IOM offices.

 

 

I'll check out the IOM address and forward it to them unless someone advises me to do otherwise.

 

 

Thank you.

 

 

If you are in Jersey and dealt with Jersey financial institutions they will all be independent legal entities from the UK companies. Jersey is a separate legal jurisdiction. Address all SARs to the Jersey company you dealt with.

 

 

 

Isle of Man is different. It also is not in EU or UK but normally adopts IoM laws that mirror EU/UK law in matters like this. I've haven't done any research but my guess is IOM will also have put a new data protection into force which you will use to submit a SAR to an IOM bank. A bit of research should soon show you what the current IOM DP law is and how to submit a SAR. Again I'd think the UK SAR template will be fine to use with some tweaking to refer to IOM law. IOM banks are typically legally separate from both UK and Jersey banks, so send your SAR to the IOM bank who gave you the mortgage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Citi and lots of other creditors are based or were there

we've seen loads of SAR returns with their info Inc the jersey stuff.

 

pers id use their UK head office data address in the FCA register

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

 

But, unless you have lived "offshore", you will have no idea just how closed a shop it can (and does) become.

 

 

Ordinary rules don't apply and the judiciary is fiercely (if quietly) protective of its independence from the UK, the EU or any A N Other.

 

 

On a plus side, the UK "six year" retention of documents has never existed over here. Institutions are required, by law, to retain copies of documents ad infinitum.

 

 

Another plus is, being such a small place, you not only know what your bank manager looks like but also where he lives and (perhaps more importantly) drinks. LOL

 

 

 

 

Citi and lots of other creditors are based or were there

we've seen loads of SAR returns with their info Inc the jersey stuff.

 

pers id use their UK head office data address in the FCA register

Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend is experiencing cold feet in sending a SAR to the bank, not wishing to unnecessarily upset them.

 

Additionally, we have dug out all the (albeit incomplete) details of the four accounts (1 x Credit Card; 1 x Savings Account; 1 x Current Account; 1 x Loan Account).

 

This includes the Loan account agreement (although none of the other actual agreements - only some of the statements).

 

The Loan Account does not mention "Payment Protection" or "Insurance" in any form that is obvious to us.

 

None of the other accounts' statements which have been retained appear to make any charges in favour of the bank other than the usual "Interest-In" (with the Savings account) and "Interest Out" and/or "Standing Charges" (with the Current and the Credit Card accounts). Indeed, the charges appear to be quite low overall.

 

What to do?

 

Is there any point in causing unnecessary tribulation to the bank, which appears to be (and have been) operating quite honourably (apart from the Loan account's interest rate seeming to be something of a pee-take, to me)?

 

If someone could help us out, we would be very grateful.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well it make no odds as the sar could be for completion of your pers financial records

you don't have to even mention PPI

but if you don't think there is any then...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well it make no odds as the sar could be for completion of your pers financial records..

 

 

Good point, well made.

 

 

I can't see any real harm in asking.

 

 

In the worst case scenario, all we've wasted is time, I suppose.

 

 

Thanks for the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...