Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Settling outside of insurance


lancydancy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2125 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, so my son nudged a car in the rear bumper. The car behind had the owner in it. Both parties got out of the cars and looked for damage, both agreed there was none and went on their way. 6 hours later my son receives a message on Facebook from the other driver saying he had noticed a big split in his bumper. We went and looked at it, not convinced the damage was caused by my son but can’t prove otherwise. We asked if they’d be prepared to settle without the need for insurance companies as my son is in first year of driving and has a £600 excess. They agreed. He got a “quote” from a garage he uses for £500. And told me to call the garage to let them explain what the costs were for. I did and got a mouthful from the bloke saying how dare I ask him To prove it. He also admitted he hadn’t seen the car and was “guessing” what damage there might be under the bumper. I got another quote and that was £300. Now they’re threatening to go through the insurance.

My question is...if we do pay the £500, would a letter signed by both parties stating they won’t make any further claim etc be enough for them not to be able to go through the insurance?

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet they won't sign anything and as soon as you've given them the £500 they'll put a claim through for personal injury.

These characters are spiteful, so you've got very little choice.

Contact your insurance.

The excess is for damage to your car, for third party they sort it out and you don't pay anything (then they double your insurance for the following 5 years)

Make sure you tell your insurance about the assessed £500 damage and if you can give them proof.

At least they won't be able to get a new car out of this.

£500 for a bumper???

What car was it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any uninspected damage can onl oy be a cost estimate, not a quote.

Your son is required to exchange Ins details with other driver pdq and notify his Insurer of the 'accident' whether or not his excess is at risk.

£500 for a replacement plastic bumper + fitting may not be excessive, but can still be a [problem]. Ask other driver if he will allow your named garage/repairer to inspect the vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet they won't sign anything and as soon as you've given them the £500 they'll put a claim through for personal injury.

These characters are spiteful, so you've got very little choice.

Contact your insurance.

The excess is for damage to your car, for third party they sort it out and you don't pay anything (then they double your insurance for the following 5 years)

Make sure you tell your insurance about the assessed £500 damage and if you can give them proof.

At least they won't be able to get a new car out of this.

£500 for a bumper???

What car was it?

 

07 plate old shape Ford Fiesta! Not a mark on my sons car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife was in the same situation a few years ago.

The other driver demanded £250 On the spot, not a mark on our car and the other car was a scrap with not a single panel or bumper in ok condition, bumps and deep scratches everywhere.

We refused to hand over the £250 and said to get a quote.

Quote came at £250, strangely.

I said I was going to the garage to pay it there and then, I was 5 minutes away.

They said no, give us the cash.

Eventually we didn't pay and informed our insurance.

They ended up paying £5k for a personal injury without investigating this 1mph accident.

Whiplash at 1mph???

4 years later our insurance premium is still double than it should be.

Moral of the story: they're out there to sc.am you.

Fit a dashcam and record all calls, that6the only protection you have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife was in the same situation a few years ago.

The other driver demanded £250 On the spot, not a mark on our car and the other car was a scrap with not a single panel or bumper in ok condition, bumps and deep scratches everywhere.

We refused to hand over the £250 and said to get a quote.

Quote came at £250, strangely.

I said I was going to the garage to pay it there and then, I was 5 minutes away.

They said no, give us the cash.

Eventually we didn't pay and informed our insurance.

They ended up paying £5k for a personal injury without investigating this 1mph accident.

Whiplash at 1mph???

4 years later our insurance premium is still double than it should be.

Moral of the story: they're out there to sc.am you.

Fit a dashcam and record all calls, that6the only protection you have.

 

Insurers are all fiddling claims, the whole industry is a multi billion pound [problem] that we're forced to pay.

 

Simple bumps that cause absolutely no damage end up having bills that are in the thousands because the insurers body shop will inflate what work needs doing at an inflated price, then the hire car companies get a slice of the pie with inflated car hire costs, and of course the personal injury claim because the human body is unable to cope with the stresses of a 5mph collision.

 

I have property abroad in Europe, in which the country in question cars are insured and not people, there's no claim culture, no personal injury parasites, everything is good value for money.

 

Makes you wonder what is wrong with rip off Britain nowadays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should start investigating claims instead of paying off without batting an eyelid.

If they follow drivers claiming to suffer from whiplash and they see them playing football they should report them to the police for fraud and not pay out anything.

Unfortunately the only winners here are the insurance companies and that will be it until a strict legislation is passed, especially on how much they can charge.

Every time I have to renew my insurance I feel depressed being ripped off in a perfectly legal way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

even when you have expert witnesses to support your side of the story the insurer will pay out on a claim that is worth less than say £2k as it isnt woth their time to do the full paperwork, collate evidence, and so forth. many years ago they employed ex-coppers to investigate potentail frauds and teh use their experiance to present a court case but they dont employ anyone themselves so in serious cases they outsource the dodgy claims to otherspecialists who needless to say charge a fair bit so not sconomical for the majority of this type of overegging the pudding by a garage trying to make a dishonest wedge. even if you have all of the evidence to support your side it somethimes goes wrong because the judeg just doesnt like the claimant or defendant. Seen that in a couple of cases involving friends of mine so no wonder people just let the insurers do what they like

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so if we did go down the road of settling outside the insurance, would this letter (signatures witnessed by independent) be ok? Obviously it’s just a template letter and information needs to be changed etc.

Dear Name of Injured Party:

 

This is a formal letter of agreement for payment for the damage I caused to your car on DATE. I backed into the side of your car in the parking lot at ADDRESS and damaged the driver’s door. In our telephone conversation on DATE, we agreed that the full and final settlement amount for the cost of repair is AMOUNT. I agree to pay this amount with a personal check on or before DATE. Once this payment is made, you agree that I do not owe you any more money.

 

When you sign this letter, you agree to release me from all present and future claims.

 

I have enclosed a copy of this letter for you to sign and return to me. Once we have both signed this letter, the agreement is final.

 

If you have any questions, or would like any changes in this letter, I can be reached at Phone Number or at Email Address.

 

Sincerely,

 

Signature of Responsible Person

Printed Name of Responsible Person

List of Enclosures: Copy of the letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a small thing, but it's personal cheque (rather than check) and adding king12345's suggested line to cover yourself a little more.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...