Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shergroup HCEO Notice of Enforcement - Co-op funeral debt CCJ


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2120 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Thank you for allowing me to post on your informative website.

 

I am after some advice please.

 

A CCJ was entered against me, mid May this year for £2300.

 

I’m not disputing that I don’t owe this money.

 

I have received a notice of enforcement from Shergroup Enforcement telling me that if I don’t contact the by 5pm on the 23/6 I can expect a visit at home☹️.

 

The letter only arrived this morning.

 

What should I do if they turn up.

Obviously I won’t answer the door to them or sign anything.

The property belongs to a housing association.

 

I have a car but it is on finance but I’m guessing to be on the safe side I should hide it.

 

I have two vulnerable children at home both under the age of 16.

 

I will be able to clear the debt in full in a couple of months.

 

Thanks

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

who got the CCJ [the claimant]

and whats the debt about please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claimant is the midcounties co-operative ltd.

The debt is for an unpaid family members funeral. (Not good I know..... it’s a long story. Hope that is not too outing).

Thanks

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

aw shame was there not enough money in their bank a/c to pay the funeral?

 

anyway you need to contact the bailiff and arrange suitable payment arrangements within the 7days

are they operating as HCEO here, I suspect they are?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. There were no funds in their bank account.

Yes I can contact them

Just wondering what I should do if the high court enforcement officers turn up.

Thanks

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't let them in

theres no right of forced entry.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thread title updated

 

how olds this CCJ?

 

I was wondering if you could do an n245 like here

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?485118-Funeral-Debt-Ccj-adding-interest-daily

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ccj is from 17/5/18.

As I said I should be able to pay the debt off in full by mid/end of July as the deceased’s property will be sold.

Thanks J

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure exactly which direction to go:

 

ring shergroup and tell them that [and that you are going for an N245]

 

ring the court an tell them it will be paid by xx date and what do they recommend?? N245?

 

or both?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What date is on the Notice of Enforcement you have received?

Do you still have the envelope it came in?

If so how was it posted?

 

I note what you say about making contact and will suggest if no contact made by tomorrow they could well turn up on Sunday.

Do not let them in they have no right of entry regardless of anything they may say.

 

In the meantime you need to download and fill in an application for a Stay of Execution against the Writ.

 

Depending on answers above will give grounds for application.

It does appear you will have no grounds to have the matter Set Aside but could go for a Variation allowing you to pay at a reasonable rate without all their fees.

 

They will be looking at payment in full only and may not entertain a voluntary payment plan.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure exactly which direction to go:

 

ring shergroup and tell them that [and that you are going for an N245] - don't ring it will encourage them to attend

 

ring the court an tell them it will be paid by xx date and what do they recommend?? N245?

 

or both?

 

 

Possibly not much can be done at this time on a Friday.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tnx pt

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what estate did they have?

estate is stuff like property, cash, stocks and shares, important works of art or collections. It is not stuff like furniture or other effects, personal jewellery car and so forth.

 

Lastly why did it get to a court claim, funeral directors normally give people a year to cough up as the deceased is supposed to pay for their own funeral ( they all create a contract with the living though or people would do the dirty).

 

If they had an estate did they leave a will?

If not then unless you had permission from the govt it isnt your place to make decisions in this regard.

 

Hate to say it but bodies get left in mortuaries for a long time sometimes so unless you are the nearest relative you act of kindness has been misplaced and it has now come back to bite you and the other relatives shuld be ashamed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they had an estate did they leave a will?

If not then unless you had permission from the govt it isnt your place to make decisions in this regard.

 

 

That would depend on the circumstances surrounding the deceased's estate. Your statement is certainly inaccurate and given the nature of the subject, unnecessary scaremongering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HCEOs cannot visit on Sundays or Bank Holidays.

 

Enforcement agents are permitted to enforce 7 days a week, except for Bank Holidays and Christmas Day.The time of visit will take place between 06:00 and 21:00

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Enforcement agents are permitted to enforce 7 days a week, except for Bank Holidays and Christmas Day.

 

 

The Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013 states any day of the week but the Taking Control of goods National Standards while not legally binding states "Enforcement agents should be respectful of the religion and culture of others at all times. They should carefully consider the appropriateness of undertaking enforcement on any day of religious or cultural observance or during any major religious or cultural festival" which arguably covers Sundays being a day of religious observation as that is why Bank Holidays and Christmas Day are considered to be inappropriate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

show me where this is wrong,

a person has to apply for a grant of representation.

 

If there is no estate then nothing to administer but the law is fixed on how things are done and who gets what.

 

As for scaremongering,

i am trying to point out that they may have not been liable for the debt in the first place and as an addition to that it may be possible to get the CCJ set aside on the grounds that they arent liable for the debt but the actual next of kin.

that person or persons is also determined by law and also the pecking order.

 

That would depend on the circumstances surrounding the deceased's estate. Your statement is certainly inaccurate and given the nature of the subject, unnecessary scaremongering.
Link to post
Share on other sites

ericsbrother said:
what estate did they have?

estate is stuff like property, cash, stocks and shares, important works of art or collections. It is not stuff like furniture or other effects, personal jewellery car and so forth.

 

Lastly why did it get to a court claim, funeral directors normally give people a year to cough up as the deceased is supposed to pay for their own funeral ( they all create a contract with the living though or people would do the dirty).

 

If they had an estate did they leave a will?

If not then unless you had permission from the govt it isnt your place to make decisions in this regard.

 

Hate to say it but bodies get left in mortuaries for a long time sometimes so unless you are the nearest relative you act of kindness has been misplaced and it has now come back to bite you and the other relatives shuld be ashamed.

 

Yes thats correct, we see time and time again where family arrange the funeral for a deceased relative where the estate of the deceased had no funds or assets. The relatives or even the friends that organise it then pay for the funeral.

 

Best bet would be to ring the EA(ask the office for his number). Ask him to come round to assess your circumstances.

Show him the car finance details, he wont have an interest in that then.

If you have little to no goods of value in the house, then there will likely be nothing for him to do but look to set an arrangement with you.

Feel free to refuse him access. Its your right to do so.

But if you are confident you have nothing of resale value in the house, then its not an issue as he probably wouldnt even threaten a removal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

show me where this is wrong,

a person has to apply for a grant of representation.

 

If there is no estate then nothing to administer but the law is fixed on how things are done and who gets what.

 

As for scaremongering,

i am trying to point out that they may have not been liable for the debt in the first place and as an addition to that it may be possible to get the CCJ set aside on the grounds that they arent liable for the debt but the actual next of kin.

that person or persons is also determined by law and also the pecking order.

 

 

Unfortunately the person who arranged this is the one responsible.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

show me where this is wrong,

a person has to apply for a grant of representation.

 

If there is no estate then nothing to administer but the law is fixed on how things are done and who gets what.

 

As for scaremongering,

i am trying to point out that they may have not been liable for the debt in the first place and as an addition to that it may be possible to get the CCJ set aside on the grounds that they arent liable for the debt but the actual next of kin.

that person or persons is also determined by law and also the pecking order.

 

 

If a person arranges the funeral of a deceased person and agrees to a contract to provide that service, that person is then liable for the debt. Voluntarily paying for a funeral has nothing to do with a grant of representation, it is a separate issue from administering the estate. Yes, the funeral cost could have been met from any equity in the estate but that did not happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...