Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PayPal Credit and Argos Outlet


xoanon
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2126 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

First, sorry if I’m in the wrong place. I’m not sure if this should be here or on the retail or legal forums.

Second, I’m mainly after information and can’t seem to find anything clear anywhere else to answer this question.

 

The situation is this...

 

End of August last year I purchased a tablet type thing from the Argos Outlet on EBay.

It cost £140 or thereabouts, and I paid for it using PayPal Credit

(I actually opened the PayPal Credit account during the purchase, so this was the first transaction).

The payments were to be spread over a year at something like 12.9% APR

 

Recently the tablet went wrong and was returned to Argos, who have processed and provided a full refund on the initial purchase price.

That refund appears to have gone directly to my PayPal credit account, as opposed to my standard PayPal account (it hasn’t yet cleared properly).

 

So, my questions are these...

 

Should interest be refunded, as the purchase was effectively cancelled during the credit agreement? If so, by whom?

 

Should the entire transaction become void, with no interest, and payments reallocated to other items now on my PayPal Credit account?

 

Do I need to make a section 75 claim, does that even cover PayPal Credit?

 

Does the credit agreement just continue until paid, including interest, and the refund just get allocated as a normal payment?

 

I admit to being fully in the dark about how this is supposed to work, especially with PayPal Credit, because it seems it’s in a vague area legal wise.

I can’t find anything definitive on the Internet, although I may have missed something by not asking the right question.

 

I also will say again, the refund hasn’t fully cleared so I may be jumping the gun a little, but I’d like to be clear on what should happen so I know if it’s been done correctly or if I need to make a section 75 or do something else.

 

Thanks for helping in advance

 

Rich

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd await the full refund see what happens

have you other stuff now on PP credit then?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I’ve had three or four other things, which is why I think the refund has gone straight onto that. The outstanding balance has dropped by around the same amount as the refund

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd ask PP

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The refund has officially gone on to the PayPal credit balance, so I now need to know what the correct process is with regard to items that are refunded when paid for on credit.

 

Yes, I can ask PayPal, but from experience they don’t always have any clue themselves about correct procedures. I’d rather have a clue in advance as to if I should be asking, for example, to make a section 75 to class back the interest or if I am not entitled to any refund of interest or whatever the case may be.

 

I realise nobody may know the answer on here, but if anyone can tell me who would be able to answer I’d appreciate that too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sec 75 and chargeback are 2 sep things

If they have refunded under cra the int should be refunded too as consequential loss

Who responsible is a diff matter and is it worth it for a couple of £?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being unable to work and constantly juggling money means yes, even a couple of quid makes a difference some weeks! I know to someone working full time on however much a year it may not, to me it does.

 

So please could you tell me who I should be asking for it and what I should be asking for. Preferably in simple terms :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be PP

They provided the credit for X item x item has been refunded

Have you asked yet?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

After a thoroughly confusing conversation with PayPal...

 

It seems that if you return items in conjunction with their disputes system it works one way (clearing the transaction and refunded interest if successful)

While if you go to the vendor it works another way (refunded amount applied to outstanding transactions in preferential order with highest interest items first and no refund on interest)

 

They are going to open an escalation for me to look at both refunding interest and reducing the rate of interest on the refunded item to zero for remaining payments. No guarantees it will happen.

 

Some of their policies, especially the allocation of payments for non minimum payments, are extremely difficult to track down. I haven’t actually found them on the website at all. It’s very unclear on most things to be honest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s unclear if it would be, PayPal Credits faqs are vague at best and extremely limited. They aren’t really helpful in any sense, and the call centre acknowledge this and admit they’ve had a lot of ‘feedback’ to that effect.

 

They say they’re planning to rectify this soon...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...