Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car Scraped By Bus


Jayden1994
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2133 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Not sure If I'm posting in the right section but just wanted to get peoples opinion on this. Last night I was queuing behind a couple cars to turn right at a set of lights, Bus comes along in the left hand lane going ahead and decides to completely scrape my passenger side wheel arch as he does and continues to drive on. I drop someone off whom was in the car and go looking for the driver as I briefly saw his face in his side mirror when the incident happened and the bus number etc. I find him and get him to give his details over which he wasn't hesitant to do at all and he gives me this Arriva card with all details needed on.

 

I've reported this to Arriva and forwarded images on to them of which I'll show you. I'll post the turning where I was hit here as well as I want other peoples opinion that I am in no way liable as I cannot see how I could possibly be.

 

I have informed arriva that I have a wedding to attend end of next week where I will be driving the bride and I need my car restored by then.

 

Here are the lights it happened at:

 

https://imgur.com/a/BnRBmcd

 

The snippet is a good example of my own situation. I am the VW polo waiting to turn right and the bus in the left was the bus going ahead except he got too close to my stationary car and scraped me.

 

Here are the damages to my vehicle:

 

https://imgur.com/a/yX94noq

 

Let me know what you guys think.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the basis of what you say, I can't see that there will be any difficulty – although it may be time consuming. I can't imagine that you're going to have your car sorted in time for the wedding.

 

I would begin by getting two quotations for the work from reputable repairers – authorised repairers would be best – and put them into Arriva as quickly as possible. You could given 14 days to agree to the quotes or else you will have the work done yourself. I'm afraid I can't see that it would be reasonable to give them any shorter time – as unfair as it might seem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand. I have a private repairer who usually comes to my home to repair this sort of stuff. Would I be able to get him to handle this for me and ask for a receipt or something that I could forward to arriva for reimbursement?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could but arrive wouldn't reimburse you. By that logic you could.have a very expensive repairer come instead.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the very least they should be given a fair opportunity to inspect the damage and to consider the two independent quotations you provide.

 

In terms of deciding whether or not they are prepared to accept liability without being forced to, that is less urgent and that can happen after the damage has been repaired. However, as unfair as it seems to be, you will have difficulty claim back the cost of repairs if you have not demonstrated a willingness to involve them and also a willingness to mitigate the loss by seeking comparative quotes and choosing the cheapest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as said above I need this for the end of next week so I've just organised my private mobile repairer to sort it out this sunday for me for £100.

 

I have rang arriva multiple times and sent over pictures of said damage already which they have forwarded to their engineer to "speed up the process" and save him the time of coming to visit me. So I have been complying and to be honest £100 is ridiculously cheap once they accept liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From your description it is the Bus Driver/Company that are liable, but you cannot dictate that your car must be repaired by time X, they are only under an obligation to have it repaired within a "reasonable time" and more than 1 week would not constitute unreasonable at all.

It's quite possible that they may have an agreement with other repairers that could have done the work for even less than the £100 you've been quoted, had the company been given the chance to inspect the damage prior to it being repaired. If the damage is repaired before they are able to have it inspected then they could well refuse any kind of payout and argue that you've gotten a more expensive quote or potentially had pre-existing damage repaired as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea well as I said above I need my car in shape for friday so I am getting it repaired myself this sunday and will seek reimbursement once they admit liability.

 

The timing was horrible for this so whatever happens from this point happens I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've agreed the cost of 150 for my repairs with my assessor who doesn't need to inspect my vehicle anymore and is compiling the report as we speak and is simply waiting for arriva to handle the liability aspect. When they are liable I will be reimbursed via bank transfer and agreed this with my assessor and arriva transcare themselves who handle the overall case.

 

I have requested footage which I will have within 10days apparently and now I am waiting for the driver to either admit liability or not and then arriva will have to look into the footage if he doesn't.

 

Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would guess the driver will say he knows nothing about it as often driving a large vehicle unless there is a specific bump then a scrape may go unnoticed. Arriva used to have external cameras fitted to their vehicles because of the number of fraudulent claims for bumps & personal injuries they were being put to but in your case it should work the other way.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the event that there is any problem over liability, I think you have a pretty strong clue in the photograph of the bus which you have posted above.

 

You see the bus is not following the line of the road and is actually cutting across because the junction is a staggered junction. This is probably pretty normal for all buses and I would suggest that in the event of any dispute that you go and take pictures of several Arriva buses at the same point and I'll bet you all of them are doing the same thing.

 

I think if I were to place several photographs of buses not following the line of the road correctly before a County Court judge then I'm pretty certain that the judge would say that beyond the balance of probability (the standard of proof for civil liability) that your bus driver done the same thing.

 

I think your chances of success would be better than 80%

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...