Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds Bank linking wrong information again !!!


Luco19
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2105 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ill start by stating i have never had any dealings with Lloyds Bank in my life but they have registered accounts on my credit report.

 

There is two accounts on my file one mortgage for an address which is not mine and also a credit card again which is not mine.

 

The mortgage is in serious arrears and the credit card is listed as defaulted.I am also receiving debt collection letters.

 

I have had problems with Lloyds in 2010 - 13 where they also had a CCJ against me.

 

They also sent a letter from there solicitors to my address stating i was a fraudster. (see attachment)

 

I managed to get things erased from my credit file eventually through a lot of hard work , and eventually i went to the newspapers and FOS who helped me sort it.

 

I received a disgraceful amount of compensation for what they had put me through and now they have managed to wreck my credit file again.

 

I have sent SAR off and i am awaiting response.

 

Again this is for a person with the same name and DOB as me but this person has a middle name and i do not.

 

Any help or similar experiences with this kind of thing would be good to know so i can again chase them.

 

Thanks.

 

Sorry attachment here from mentioned above.

 

see my other links

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?488056-Barclays-default-not-mine-!!!&p=5129009#post5129009

Lyons Letter.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Luco - This sounds to me like you need Lloyds Exec team to deal with. Id email the CEO

Go to CEOEmail to get the email address. IUf you need help drafting something - Please do let us know.

 

You could be due a big payout as this will affect your credit file!! Can cause higher APR Rates and reduced credit limits on cards...!!

 

FKO

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but I don't think this is at all suitable for an email to the CEO. I understand that there was an exactly similar problem with Lloyds about seven or eight years ago which was eventually resolved after a big struggle, a decision from the FOS and some kind of court action.

 

Now Lloyds are doing it again. Last time Lloyds got away with a desultory compensation.

 

I think this needs to be done formally rather than letting them deal with it in-house.

 

I think the best thing to do is wait for the SAR and then start making formal complaints in various places.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully this will clarify how the CRAs work , i have posted here a couple of paragraphs from my letter i received off Experian about Lloyds , i have also attached the full letter for those who have PDFlink3.gif reader, which i would advise reading.

 

 

 

“As we have advised in previous correspondence, the companies who provide the credit reference agencies are the ones who are ultimately responsible for the accuracy of the data they send to those credit reference agencies”

"As previously advised, any instance of Experian providing your address or any other address to a company as a 'POSSIBLE' address for there creditor would have been on the strict understanding that they take the appropriate steps to ensure they have established that their creditor does indeed live at an address before linking them with it"

Thanks.

Experion FOS letter1_1.pdf

Experian FOS letter2_1.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but I don't think this is at all suitable for an email to the CEO. I understand that there was an exactly similar problem with Lloyds about seven or eight years ago which was eventually resolved after a big struggle, a decision from the FOS and some kind of court action.

 

Now Lloyds are doing it again. Last time Lloyds got away with a desultory compensation.

 

I think this needs to be done formally rather than letting them deal with it in-house.

 

I think the best thing to do is wait for the SAR and then start making formal complaints in various places.

 

 

 

 

I will definately be waiting for the SAR before proceeding thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just an update to let everyone that is following this thread know whats going on so far, Lloyds like all of the banks i have dealt with have requested a further 60 days to produce a SAR. Ill post again in September.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...