Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Disciplinary while off work from work related stress


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there first time posting so please be gentle!

 

I’ve worked for my current company for 10 years now and have a really good non sickness record and have never been in any disciplinary trouble.

 

However on 27th April my employer stated and investigation into me and the team I was leading, after 2 investigation hearings I was suspended on 8th May.

The company suspension policy recommends 5 working days suspension however I was suspended a lot longer, finally on the 17 working day The stress got to much for me and contacted HR and asked them for an update, 2 days later I got an invite to a disciplinary.

 

The day before my disciplinary I finally cracked and called the sick line with work related stress and got into my doctors a few days later who signed me off for 2 weeks.

 

My employer emailed me to ask if they could contact me yesterday and that call never came despite me looking at my phone all night however they have called tonight.

 

My emplyer asked how I was but then quickly started to put pressure on me by wanting to know when I would be fit to attend the disciplinary,

I stated I have the doctors tomorrow and I would keep him updated as per the absence policy which I have followed to the T but stated I didn’t feel mentally ready at the moment to even look at the evidence against me and I felt I needed to be in a better state of mind to fight this accusation (Gross misconduct charge).

 

I want to fight this and don’t want it dragging on any longer than need be but I have only been off sick less than 2 weeks surely they can’t be pressuring me like this without even getting a occupational health report on me?

 

Sorry for going on but my questions are.

 

1) Can I be dismissed while off with GP’s note through work related stress?

 

2) Has my employer acted reasonable in all of this, given the amount of stress it has put on me?

 

Many thanks

Bob

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Bob - Currently going through this myself with my place...

You Say Gross Misconduct however what have they put it as?

 

Have they completed an investigatory meeting with you?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Feel for you as it’s not a very nice situation.

They have stated gross misconduct for failing to follow a company policy however I have never signed this company policy in question.

 

Yes I’ve had 3 investigation meetings twice while still at work and one while suspended, I’ve cooperated at every stage of this and have provided evidence to my innocence however I feel they are trying to force me out or hoping I would resign hence why I was suspended for so long

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm very difficult to suggest what to do - Are you part of a union?

The other guys will help but I would keep all your evidence and back it up. If youve been there as long as you have then potentially you can look at Employment Tribunal but there is no guarantee it would work for you.

 

ACAS might be an option worth reading about.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for help :)

Not part of a union however I might need to look into it.

Apart from the one investigation meeting while suspended and it’s been recorded in the minutes multiple times that this was causing a lot of stress for me have my company contacted me to even ask about my health, the fact I had to contact them for an update shows how little the company thinks of there employees

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the size of the organisation? Not asking you to name 😀

 

(How many employees?)

 

Also to add I know how you feel and can understand work related stress how it would affect you 😀

Try not to be let it get to you (Easier said than done)

 

Do you work in a market area where you can could find a job elsewhere?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Overall size of the company is 10,000 with about 500 on my site.

Yes I’m lucky in my area has one of the lowest unemployment rate in the country and quite often companies have to look for staff from over 30 miles away to employe, So getting another job won’t be an issue however finding one as good pay as this would be but I want to fight this as I’m innocent.

 

Hope things work out for you too Fkofilee know it feels like your up a certain creek without a paddle at times!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm slightly confused- you did it or you didn't. Whether you signed the policy really has no bearing on it. How we might advise you depends heavily on whether you did it or not, and what you supposedly did.

 

They're is no point joining a union now. You can't buy insurance once the house has started burning. No union would represent you at this stage in proceedings.

 

In relation to your questions:

 

Yes, you can be dismissed whilst off sick. I do appreciate your position. Innocent or not, these things are stressful. But going off sick with stress in the face of a disciplinary is classic. Everyone and their uncle does it to play for time being paid before they get sacked. So employers have little sympathy for people who do this, and it adds little credence in tribunals considerations, because they know it too. Broadly, there is only one way to relieve stress - get it over with. It won't get better with this hanging over you, it will get worse. Believe me, I am positive. Which brings us back to - did you do it and what is your defence?

 

I can see nothing unreasonable in any of the employers actions. Disciplinary procedures usually read as an aspiration as too the amount of time it takes, but seriously, 5 working days is ridiculously short in fact, and I can't think of any company who would think they could conduct even a simple investigation in that period of time. This probably won't make you feel any better, but for gross misconduct, weeks, possibly several, is not unusual; and months is not uncommon either.

 

You can't stop it dragging on, and also fight it, and be signed off sick. You are asking for diametrically opposed things.

 

And I think you need to be realistic. Your are complaining that you've only been off sick for two weeks, but at the same time they haven't contacted you to see how you are; but you are saying that you are too sick to discuss the alleged misconduct with them, and they have to leave you alone until you are fit to defend yourself; but they also asked you how you were yesterday! The employer will, right now, be taking legal advice if they haven't already. They will be watching their every move. Nobody is going to talk to you because that risks them being open to allegations of bullying or harassment. Every discussion, every piece of communication is going to be monitored and managed. And scrupulously lawful if they can manage that.

 

So where does that leave you? If you want to fight this, sorry but I'm going to be blunt - you need to get yourself back fit for work and you need to do it now. I'm not insensitive, despite how that might sound, but I have been here hundreds if not thousands of times. The longer you are off, the less likely it is that you will ever go back, and the sicker you will become until it eats into you.

 

If you are not going to go back, then now is the time to offer your resignation, preferably in return for the allegations being dropped and a clean or neutral reference. Whether they will entertain that will depend on several factors, including what they think you have done, the culture of organisation, and whether they are preferring to eradicate risk to themselves in legal terms.

 

What would you prefer to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Bob - Currently going through this myself with my place...

You Say Gross Misconduct however what have they put it as?

 

Have they completed an investigatory meeting with you?

 

Sorry to hear that. I hope you are in a union? If you need any advice please feel that you can ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...