Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capital One refuse interest on PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I made a mistake and tried a ppi agent to deal with Cap1.

 

they paid them and the agent deducted their commission and sent me the balance together with Cap1 letter calculations.

Cap1 determined that since i was aware of PPI in 2005 when i cancelled the ppi then i was not entitled to receive interest since it was over 5 years ago.

 

I wrote back asking them to pay the interest since i cancelled the ppi because i could not afford it... NOT THAT PPI HAD BEEN MISSOLD... DIDNT AWARE OF THAT UNTIL MY CLAIM WAS SUBMITTED.

 

They will not budge their offer was final.

 

Questions: do I have a reasonable case for interest? should I lodge complaint with FOS or go to court??

 

thanks

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I suppose you won't like me saying it, but you've been here since 2006 and I'm amazed that you should ask an agent to deal with this when you know all of the help here.

 

We are lucky if we get a few quid from anybody we help – most of the time we don't – and yet you presumably have paid hundreds of pounds to somebody who clearly hasn't even done a decent job for you. I feel a little bit of sick rising into my mouth.

 

You should certainly lodge a complaint with the FOS. Do it immediately.

 

The only other thing to say is that presumably you have raised this with the agents you instructed and they have accepted the payment of the capital sum. I think this probably gives you a good basis for resisting any further claim they might want to make in respect of interest payments.

 

One of things I would do would be to write to Capital One, send them an SAR and also revoke any permissions they have to communicate with your agent. Ask for confirmation of this. In fact send them your letter revoking authorities first – and then afterwards send the SAR to make sure they have received all. Send the revocation by first class recorded delivery post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bankfodder

 

Cruel but true... I deserve it all... criticism I mean...

 

I was extremely active back then and tried very hard to give good advice... but I gotten burnt out...

 

I marvel at times of your perserverance… you and your colleagues do a splendid job and I will donate...

 

I withdrew from all involvement when my debts became time imited: I confess to being surprised that only Halifax took me to court on one debt... the rest I guess just wrote them off.

 

The cap1 test was my first foray into PPI because having got away owing so much debt I did not wish to talk to banks on a one on one basis, the truth was I was ashamed of the mess I got into an needed an intermediate.

 

However, I have swallowed my pride and pursued others on my own with hrlp from dx100uk on a couple.

 

and you are correct I will withdraw all permission with the agent.

I think I have all the SAR details from back then so I will rework your spreadsheets and lodge a complaint with FOS

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bankfodder…

 

I have briefly read some of the FOS thread titles and really dont want to waste time if they are incapable of investigating properly.

 

I am inclined to head for the county court using dx100uk two spreadsheet process.

 

Is there a link where the FOS guidelines are as to what to pay and any restrictions like the 5 year rule....

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

id go to the fos

this will give you a good benchmark as to if you are correct

going to court and losing will cost you

FOS is free

 

whats this 5yrs rule?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx100uk...

 

the Cap reply is in the scanned doc attached.. my response and request for interest (incorrectly calculated in their favour btw) was rejected because of the reasons they gave...

 

my response was

 

It was my belief that payment of PPI was a mandatory requirement in using the credit cards you provided. I was finding it extremely difficult paying for PPI and I reluctantly contacted you asking for permission to cancel PPI. I was not aware that I had beem missold PPI until an agent contacted me earlier this year.

cap1.jpeg

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they cant prove you were aware it was missold

only you cancelled it to save money.

 

sar should show that too

 

could always go for a plevin reclaim

they cant deny you have PPI and they got commission, they admitted it in B&W.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry dx100uk

they have included Plevin in their payment..

my argument is that I should be entitled to a full restitionary payment.

the sar doesnt reveal why i cancelled simply that i cancelled ppi… and … there are two accounts.. for whatever reason i only cancelled ppi on the smaller account after a year whereas the other i paid ppi from 2001 to 2006...

what do you think?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...