Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employer Cancelled Flexible Working Contract & Now Disciplinary


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2149 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

 

 

 

See if you guys can assist me. I have been working Flexible Working since 2015 as I look after a disabled wife and a child. Recently during a meeting with my manager, my manager informed me that he wants to cancel my flexible working and wants to increase my working days from 3 (under flexible working) to 5 days a week. I was given 2 weeks notice and given a date when this change will be applicatble. I objected to this decision, but the manager simply announced his decision and ended the meeting and said no further discussions.

 

 

I received his decision in writing with inaccuracies in statement to which I objected, as his decision contained various factual discrepancies and asked him to give me evidence to substantiate his reasons. I have however, not yet received them. I further wrote to them formally rejecting the proposed changes to the terms of my contract and informed them I would be sticking to the currect terms of my contract and would be working 3 days a week only.

 

 

I then received phone call asking how I was from another manager as I had gone AWOL. I asked this manager to check my 2 letters that I sent in and have not received a reply to yet as these letters clearly address that I do not agree to new terms and I would be work 3 days only. I then had further discussion with another manager and I told him exactly the same that I am expecting a reply to my previous 2 letters.

 

 

I then received a letter from another manager informing me that I have gone AWOL and if I do not turn up under new terms i.e. 5 days a week I will be marked down AWOL.

 

Today I have received another letter calling me in an investigation for Disciplinary hearing regarding my AWOL. All of this is despite:

 

 

1) Management, unilaterally changing my terms of contract.

2) Management, not replying to my objections I raised in response to their decision.

3) Me formally rejecting their proposed changes.

4) Me informing them that I will be doing my shifts under flexible working and that I have not had response to my 2 letters.

 

 

Can someone kindly guide me,

 

 

1) am I wrong here?

2) Can I be sacked in this AWOL hearing? knowing that I have already told them why am I not turning up to shifts?

3) Can flexible working be unilaterally changed?

4) Should there not be a status quo applied till my objections raised are answered?

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the flexible working is important but also a red herring as they are changing your terms of employment. See here. Use this first.

 

 

 

http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=3971

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the flexible working is important but also a red herring as they are changing your terms of employment. See here. Use this first.

 

 

 

http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=3971

 

 

Thanks Emmzzi,

According to ACAS link

 

An existing contract of employment can be varied only with the agreement of both parties. Changes can be agreed by with either on an individual basis or through a collective agreement. When any change to a contract of employment occurs the employer should give written notification of the changes in writing, within one month of the change taking effect.

 

 

As I said in our meeting we were not even given a chance to say our side and were given 2 weeks time for this change to implement.

 

 

Bigger issue is that now company is taking me down the route of disciplinary for AWOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a union at your place of work? You could really use some in person help!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a union at your place of work? You could really use some in person help!

 

 

Union is looking into this matter and according to them the employer is at wrong and they can assist for unfair dismissal once I get sacked, NOT before

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, the union should be helping in order to prevent the unfair dismissal. But things don't always work like this.

 

You say you have to provide care for a disabled partner and child. Can't help wondering if the employer would fall foul of the disabled & discrimination laws. Perhaps Emmnzzi could comment.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, the union should be helping in order to prevent the unfair dismissal. But things don't always work like this.

 

You say you have to provide care for a disabled partner and child. Can't help wondering if the employer would fall foul of the disabled & discrimination laws. Perhaps Emmnzzi could comment.

I have raised formal concern, both during the meeting and in a formal letter of concern that I have carer responsiblity and childcare responsibilty and warned the employer about the the impact of these changes to welfare of myself and my family. I have formally informed them that I need to carry on flexible working due to this very reason

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, would need a lot more info to decide if there's a discrimination case there, but it's def. potential, Mr. P. It's much better if it doesn't need to get that far.

 

 

 

Union reps in other places I have worked would be taking the manager aside for a quiet word and saying, "Look, I know we got busy and you need more hours, but you may not be aware of this leglisaltion, can I have a word before it escalates, I'm sure there's an answer..."

 

 

I would ask the regional/head office if that is a thing which they could help with.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, would need a lot more info to decide if there's a discrimination case there, but it's def. potential, Mr. P. It's much better if it doesn't need to get that far.

 

 

 

Union reps in other places I have worked would be taking the manager aside for a quiet word and saying, "Look, I know we got busy and you need more hours, but you may not be aware of this leglisaltion, can I have a word before it escalates, I'm sure there's an answer..."

 

 

I would ask the regional/head office if that is a thing which they could help with.

 

 

This is the advice from Regional/Head Office

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's bad advice, so push harder.

 

I agree. As Emmzzi often points out, you have no way of verifying who anyone on the internet is, but if you wish to believe it, I'm a union official and if this really was said to a member I'd have some choice phrases to use, some not very polite. Assuming, of course, that this is the whole story, because for one reason or another, sometimes perspectives don't match.

 

Having said that the ACAS quote is a little light too. It actually is entirely possible to effect a contractual change without agreement of the employee. It happens a lot. So don't think it can't be done. It can. It is. Done correctly, it's legal.

Edited by sangie5952
Fix the autocorrect typo ;-)
Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't go into discussions on what you should could do otherwise I'll get attacked, but gleno, you are the kind of employee that make the workforce proud.

Stick to your guns and they'll most likely back down.

If they won't, et will compensate you.

Keep them on their toes by sending all communication recorded delivery.

They hate these evidence in disciplinary, exposed them as the fools they are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. As Emmzzi often points out, you have no way of verifying who anyone on the internet is, but if you wish to believe it, I'm a union official and if this really was said to a member I'd have some choice phrases to use, some not very polite. Assuming, of course, that this is the whole story, because for one reason or another, sometimes perspectives don't match.

 

Having said that the ACAS quote is a little light too. It actually is entirely possible to effect a contractual change without agreement of the employee. It happens a lot. So don't think it can't be done. It can. It is. Done correctly, it's legal.

Hi Sangie

I checked again and My union representative have asked me to seek legal advice. Once again I sought assistance from union’s legal department and they advised to send me paperwork so they can begin initial vetting for potential claim of unfair dismissal.

For their advice I should tell my employer that I will be working under protest. But biggest question is how? Given my circumstances

Also even if we play devils advocate and say employer can anull my flexible working then when I raised objections to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand your concerns, but you need to ask the legal team how you work under protest. We have very little information to go on, and the law gives employers the upper hand in many things, so one false step can undermine a claim. I'd love to be as certain of life as others on this thread, and simply fighting means an ET win and compensation for you. But life isn't like that. By all means use boards like this to check up or clarify things you are being told, but get your union to tell you what and how to do things. They have a more complete picture, and it's them who will decide whether or not there's a legal claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand your concerns, but you need to ask the legal team how you work under protest. We have very little information to go on, and the law gives employers the upper hand in many things, so one false step can undermine a claim. I'd love to be as certain of life as others on this thread, and simply fighting means an ET win and compensation for you. But life isn't like that. By all means use boards like this to check up or clarify things you are being told, but get your union to tell you what and how to do things. They have a more complete picture, and it's them who will decide whether or not there's a legal claim.

I agree. As Emmzzi often points out, you have no way of verifying who anyone on the internet is, but if you wish to believe it, I'm a union official and if this really was said to a member I'd have some choice phrases to use, some not very polite. Assuming, of course, that this is the whole story, because for one reason or another, sometimes perspectives don't match.

 

Having said that the ACAS quote is a little light too. It actually is entirely possible to effect a contractual change without agreement of the employee. It happens a lot. So don't think it can't be done. It can. It is. Done correctly, it's legal.

Hi Sangie

I checked again and My union representative have asked me to seek legal advice. Once again I sought assistance from union’s legal department and they advised to send me paperwork so they can begin initial vetting for potential claim of unfair dismissal.

For their advice I should tell my employer that I will be working under protest. But biggest question is how? Given my circumstances

Also even if we play devils advocate and say employer can anull my flexible working then when I raised objections against their decision should status quo not apply?

My issue is that I have received no response from management and they are pursuing investigation path for me not attending work under new terms based on their decision and ignoring to Answer to my objections. I have even turned up to work on shifts under my flexible working only to be sent home and I have also informed management that I won’t be in on days they are expecting me to as I have written my objections to their decision twice but not heard anything back.

Where do I stand in an AWOL investigation given these circumstances?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I edited the later half of the message which was posted as another reply. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Most importantly do you not think by me raising objections a status quo would apply to employers decision?

And given I have told employers that I am awaiting response and doing shifts under my old terms and also informed them that I won’t be in days they are proposing where do I stand with AWOL Hearing

Link to post
Share on other sites

I edited the later half of the message which was posted as another reply. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Most importantly do you not think by me raising objections a status quo would apply to employers decision?

And given I have told employers that I am awaiting response and doing shifts under my old terms and also informed them that I won’t be in days they are proposing where do I stand with AWOL Hearing

 

I am not going to comments on the legal contract issue you have with your employers, other than to suggest that you think about contacting a Solicitors that deals with employment rights. Giving your caring responsibilities outside of work, there might be organisations ( e.g. charities) that help parents in these situations. I.e. They might have access to very good Solicitors that can take on cases. Perhaps there is a way to resolve this, if the employer is willing to do so, without it getting to the stage where they dismiss you, leading to an employment tribunal.

 

If you did end up getting dismissed from your employment, how easy would it be to find suitable alternative employment where you live ? In some areas of the country, there are not a lot of employment choices and even if there are many jobs available, how many would be flexible.

 

Have you looked into what help you can receive outside of work, so you are able to work the hours your employer now requires ? Have you had a benefit review with an advisor from say Citizens Advice ? It might be worth doing so. Billions of pounds of benefits people could claim go unclaimed every year, because people either don't know they were eligible or don't consider they need Government benefits,

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not consult another solicitor! You have a union. Go elsewhere now and they will wash their hands of you. You cannot have two legal advisors. Only go elsewhere if you have decided yippy don't want union support or they won't give it to you.

 

And honestly, I can't tell you what to do. This is the unions job. So whether I think the status quo should apply is irrelevant. And what I advise you to do could be contrary to your best interests. In don't know the circumstances. You might be right. The employer might be. I don't have the information to say, and most importantly, you have a union who won't represent you if you go your own way and follow other peoples advice. So you really must talk to them. I'm not being difficult - I'm giving you the best advice you can get right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not going to comments on the legal contract issue you have with your employers, other than to suggest that you think about contacting a Solicitors that deals with employment rights. Giving your caring responsibilities outside of work, there might be organisations ( e.g. charities) that help parents in these situations. I.e. They might have access to very good Solicitors that can take on cases. Perhaps there is a way to resolve this, if the employer is willing to do so, without it getting to the stage where they dismiss you, leading to an employment tribunal.

 

If you did end up getting dismissed from your employment, how easy would it be to find suitable alternative employment where you live ? In some areas of the country, there are not a lot of employment choices and even if there are many jobs available, how many would be flexible.

 

Have you looked into what help you can receive outside of work, so you are able to work the hours your employer now requires ? Have you had a benefit review with an advisor from say Citizens Advice ? It might be worth doing so. Billions of pounds of benefits people could claim go unclaimed every year, because people either don't know they were eligible or don't consider they need Government benefits,

I really appreciate this advice and I am looking into available help recently. The issue is that the cost of such service such as childcare and carers outweighs middle class income. I am therefore looking into Citizen Advice and social services.

I have seen a solicitor yesterday with all paperwork and they have advised that I have a very strong case of resigning and claiming constructive dismissal or if I get sacked then for unfair dismissal. The issue around AWOL and previous issues shows that employers are retaliating as I am questioning them by writing to them. However, the solicitor needed barrister advice to ascertain chances of winning and that would be at a heavy cost.

I am so stressed with all this that I am struggling to cope with day to day life tasks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really appreciate this advice and I am looking into available help recently. The issue is that the cost of such service such as childcare and carers outweighs middle class income. I am therefore looking into Citizen Advice and social services.

I have seen a solicitor yesterday with all paperwork and they have advised that I have a very strong case of resigning and claiming constructive dismissal or if I get sacked then for unfair dismissal. The issue around AWOL and previous issues shows that employers are retaliating as I am questioning them by writing to them. However, the solicitor needed barrister advice to ascertain chances of winning and that would be at a heavy cost.

I am so stressed with all this that I am struggling to cope with day to day life tasks.

 

No, no, no! Any solicitor who knows what they are doing would never advise resigning and claiming constructive dismissal. The advice is always to wait to get dismissed. That improves your chances of winning a case. If that is what they said to you, they are rubbish.

 

And don't mention this to the union or they will drop you. You can't have multiple legal advisors.

 

Go back to the union. Ask them what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ps. Any solicitor who needs barrister advice just to assess a case isn't worth having! I can assess a case and frequently do. I can represent members and frequently do. A barrister is only required for complex cases - any seldom at the initial stages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, no, no! Any solicitor who knows what they are doing would never advise resigning and claiming constructive dismissal. The advice is always to wait to get dismissed. That improves your chances of winning a case. If that is what they said to you, they are rubbish.

 

And don't mention this to the union or they will drop you. You can't have multiple legal advisors.

 

Go back to the union. Ask them what to do.

The union advised that I send in all the evidence for them to access. They will do vetting to ascertain if I have any real prospects for case and if yes they will send me to partners solicitor firm

Link to post
Share on other sites

And don't mention this to the union or they will drop you. You can't have multiple legal advisors.

 

Go back to the union. Ask them what to do.

 

Most unions will have access to lawyers that specialise in employment matters. Mine even provides a phone line that I can call for free legal advice.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The union advised that I send in all the evidence for them to access. They will do vetting to ascertain if I have any real prospects for case and if yes they will send me to partners solicitor firm

 

Agree with Sangie, that it is probably best to let the Unions legal side look at this. I only advised seeking another opinion, as you appeared uncertain whether to trust the Union.

 

Depending on the Union and their relationship with the employers perhaps they can resolve this with senior management and avoid it needing to go legal. They might be able to point to agreements in place about flexible working and managers not trying to enforce working hours employees cannot work, because of caring commitments etc. An outside employment Solicitor might not be made aware of all existing agreements/policies in place and therefore not be able offer best assistance.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...