Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LLoyds PPI refund, much lower than my calculations


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1887 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

I used the spreadsheet from CAG to calculate the PPI redress on 5 loans I've had with Lloyds over the years, which were sold with upfront single payment policies.

I calculated total redress to be ~£24,000. I sent my complaint to Lloyds regarding these PPI policies and attached the CAG spreadsheets along with copies of original loan agreements showing PPI amounts and loan statements as proof.

 

I have received an offer from Lloyds of £9,200, which is fantastic but is actually less than I paid in upfront PPI alone, nevermind the interest, I attach both my calculations and Llyods, I'd be ever so grateful if someone could clarify who has the correct calculation.

 

There should be 10 attachments in all, first 5 below..

 

 

 

 

Thank you

 

OD2012

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please will you post these up in PDF format. If people are going to look at them closely for you then they need to be presented in a far more legible way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One multipage pdf please read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wondered if anyone had a view on this redress calculation? Have I used the CAG Spreadsheet correctly, or have I made a big mistake which explains the difference of £14800 between my 'total' and Lloyds total.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

hopefully tonight sorry been busy.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

welcomes breakdown certainly looks technically correct, but without seeing the agreements and statements = no comment.

 

I don't think you have calculated the rollover PPI correctly either in the spreadsheets...

 

read:

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?318646-PPI-Single-Premium-Your-questions-answered(1-Viewing)-nbsp

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for looking into this dx100uk.

 

I read through that link several times before starting the spreadsheets, I've revisited it to double check, but I cant see what error I have made :(

 

Looking at Lloyds calculations I don't understand why row A (Cost of single premium PPI policy added to the loan) amounts to £8673.82, yet row DI (PPI premiums to be refunded) is only £1698.97.

 

I have all SAR information from them and there is no record of any part refunds of PPI premiums when taking out new loans, is the onus on me or them to prove this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you upload your .xls files here please

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry they are above

you've inc the lump sum PPI at the start of each loan..you cant reclaim that & the monthly PPI sums

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The monthly PPI sums are just showing the interest charged on the PPI element.

 

Looking at loan 1 for example

 

Loan - £5000

PPI - £1024.39

PPI added to the loan, total loan = £6024.39

Total interest charged on PPI element =£126.35

So in total, I paid Lloyds £1150.74 for this PPI

 

My understanding was that the customer should be put back into the position had they not been sold the PPI, so;

 

1) Refund upfront single premium PPI payment of £1024.39

2) Refund the proportion of interest charged on the £1024.39 throughout the period of the loan, in this case, I made 12 monthly repayments before refinancing with loan 2, giving a total of £126.35 in interest charged.

3) Pay 8% simple interest on the above amounts until the date of the claim. = £2081.46

 

Total of 1,2 & 3 = £3232.2

Lloyds PPI refund offer = £563.08

 

Please could you point out where I've gone wrong on that? Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no because you didn't actual pay the PPI upfront in one lum sum at the start! you cant enter that! .

 

if the loan was £6024.39 then..

 

1024.39/6024.39 * 100 = 17%

 

so anything you paid then 17% was for PPI

 

so how much was your monthly PCM?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so each of the 11 months you actually paid £143.32 you paid 17% for PPI = £24.36 for ppi

so enter each of those in a new statint sheet copy on those actual monthly dates.

then when you settled for £5191.14 you paid £882.49 on that actual date too

 

that's the sheet done

 

how have you calculated this 'rollover' was the 5191.14 settled from a new refinance loan ...so a new loan settled the old one?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep that all makes sense now, thank you. I now need to re do all my spreadsheets correctly.

 

Yes this loan was settled early by a further Lloyds loan with a single premium PPI,

I worked out the amount of PPI outstanding at the point of taking out the new loan,

worked out what percentage of the new loan that figure was, i.e 12%,

then entered 12% of every new loan monthly payment as 'loan 1 PPI'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10/10 the right way..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX,

 

I've revised all the spreadsheets using the correct method, please see attached,

the total is still way off what Llyods have offered,

 

is this worth referring to ombudsmen or are my calculations still wrong and Lloyds correct somehow?

The figures I've entered are exactly what is on the loan statements/ agreements I have.

 

I have another 5 loans with them from later years which also have PPI, they seem to be dealing with them separately to these loans as they were business loans, so I don't think that's affecting the redress here as they are not showing as being linked on the loan agreements.

od2012 PPI Redress Rev1.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

so loan 1 rolled into loan 2 rolled into loan 3

so loan 3 settled loan 2?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the loan agreements, loan 2 was used to refinance loan 1.

 

The loan 3 agreement says it's not refinancing any other loan, but the dates of clearing loan 2 and receiving funds from loan 3 do tie in, also Llyods seem to have treated it as a rollover on their redress calculations, however I have treated it as a separate loan on the revised calculations as per the loan agreement, also loan 3 was only £3000, so it would not on itself clear the balance of loan 2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then loan 1 PPI cant appear in loan 3

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

all looks good now

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

send then it see what they say..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...