Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Nolan SPC OLD Captial One Credit Card Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1974 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

I am currently on similar predicament,

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?479254-Arrow-Shoos-SPC-Old-NewDay-Aqua-Credit-Card-Debt-***Claim-Dismissed-no-DN***/page5

after reviewing all the posts and efforts to divert this debt I am in the thinking that there is only 1 outcome and that is to repay the debt in some form.

 

Is it possible to phone the original debt collector and arrange some kind of repayment plan, or should I simply fill in the C2 on response form for time to pay and send to the sheriff.

 

Thanks for all the information provided between the posters, but I don’t think there is any avoidance in paying these small credit card debts with this new Simple Procedure Notice of claim.

 

I don’t like giving up, so please don’t think that of me.

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

NO!!

please start a new thread

of your OWN please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello my first time in these forums and looking for some help/advice with a

letter i received in my door post box.

 

Letter just had my name written on it with no stamp and several Simple Procedure Claim forms inside.

 

Letter is a form 6A Simple Procedure Notice of Claim with the following details about the case.

 

Sheriff court - My Local Court

claimant - Cabot Financial UK Limited

Respondent - My name

Case Reference number - Number Included.

 

Also attached was Nolans Solicitors Card, saying that all documents should be sent to the court, and that all all future payment and NON court communications in respect of this matter must be made to this office quoting a reference number.

 

Last Date for a response is 22/06/2018

 

 

Issue Date: 21/5/18

Amount approx: £951.35

Claimant: Cabot Financial UK Limited

Solicitor: Nolans Solicitors

Original Creditor: CAPITAL ONE

 

Particulars of Claim: On 29/06/2015 the Respondent entered a Credit Card Agreement with Capital One under which the Respondent borrowed from them a sum of money repayable on demand.

The said agreement was an agreement regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.. The respondent failed to pay as agreed on demand and is in breach of contract with the said CAPITAL ONE.

 

The said supplier assigned all rights in the said debt to CABOT FINANCIAL UK LIMITED on 03/04/2017 and the claimants have advised the Respondent of same. The said sum of £951.35 is the sum sued for. The claimants have made frequent requests to the Respondent to make payment of the said sum but the Respondent has refused or delayed to do so.

 

Is the debt statute barred? No or unsure?

List any letters you have sent: None Yet

 

I have tried to list as much detail as possible

Any Communication would be highly appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Easy to deal with

I see you've found the sticky already well done

 

Ring cap1 and ask now last payment

Was this taken out whilst resident in scotland?

 

Moved to scotland forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

I had no idea there was an England and Scotland Forum

sorry about that.

 

Live in Scotland and debt was created here in scotland.

 

I never got around to repaying any of the debt, but original amount was closer to £750 .

 

Thanks for swift reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

No bother ring cap1 now ask last payment date

 

Also run thru this

And insure all in post 1 answers all required

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?475116-You-have-received-a-SCOTTISH-Court-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**updated-April-2017**

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

name the issuing court: Airdrie Sheriff Court

 

Who Is The Claimant: Cabot Financial UK limited

 

Who Are the Solicitors: NOLANS Solicitors

 

What type of action? (simple/Ordinary): Simple

 

What is the claim for – Particulars of Claim:

 

1.On 29/06/2015 the Respondent entered a Credit Card Agreement with Capital One under which the Respondent borrowed from them a sum of money repayable on demand.

The said agreement was an agreement regulated under the consumer crediticon Act 1974..

The respondent failed to pay as agreed on demand and is in breach of contract with the said CAPITAL ONE.

 

2.The said supplier assigned all rights in the said debt to CABOT FINANCIAL UK LIMITED on 03/04/2017 and the claimants have advised the Respondent of same.

The said sum of £951.35 is the sum sued for.

The claimants have made frequent requests to the Respondent to make payment of the said sum but the Respondent has refused or delayed to do so.

 

Last Date Of Service:- 01/06/2018

 

Last Date For Response:- 22/06/2018

 

What Documents are listed in Box E2:[or in your form requesting the same?]

This is the information from box E2

1. No Defence - No evidence required.

 

2. No stateable Defence (Rule 4.4 breach) - No evidence required

 

3. Defence on Prescription - Copy statement of account only. (Agreement must be addmited to plead prescription. So agreement not required.)

 

4. Denial of Agreement - Copy Agreement dated 29/06/2015

 

Generic Rule 8 Orders should never be issued.

The facts of each individual case must be considered.

It should never be appropriate to have to plead evidence such as assignations or default notices until/unless specific Defences are led.

The salient feature of assignation is that it does not require the consent of the defender and the averments in this form are sufficient to confirm intimation. Default notices should never be pled due to Omnia Praesumunter Rite.

 

Acta Esse (Trustees of the Scottish Solicitors Staff Pension Fund v Pattison & Sim, CISH 96 and Trayners Latin Maxims, p419, 420)

 

Is the claim for a Overdraft, credit card, loan account, HP Agreement, Catalogue or mobile phone debt - Credit Card

 

 

BOX D5 what has the claimant stated:

 

 

The Claimants request that the court order the respondent to pay the sum of £ 951.35

 

from your knowledge: answer the following:

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? may 2016

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt Purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Yes

 

When was you last payment:- Never

 

Why did you cease payments:- Personal Issues and Poor debt Management

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

 

 

Since this has now gone to a sheriff court am worried what about the possible outcomes.

If i do not respond will how will the court affect me.

 

If i do respond and ask for time to pay, will i need to go to court or will it be done with and i just arrange payments?

Will the debt collector consider an out of court settlement at a reduced balance?

Im not concerned about about Credit scores at the moment, just what the court can do .

 

Looking to respond before weeks end and put an end to this situation.

 

Thanks

cabot-nolan new 2018 E2.pdf

Edited by dx100uk
format
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you ring cap1 up yet??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not know what to say to Capital One since debt has been passed over, i never got around to paying any installments to this debt.

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

simply ring and ask last payment date

if as you say there were none

ask them the date it was signed/taken out

the court case is nowt to do with them so no need to mention anything to them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well no way sb'd then

For the minute you sit on your hand but go read all the spc claim threads here and get familiar

 

form says take out may 2015? you say may 2016 no odds really

 

these are what you should have a read through.

https://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-0964707606882478:652l7hswbgv&ie=UTF-8&q=procedure+spc+card&sa=Search+CAG

 

do NOT respond or do anything whatsoever without checking here 1st

also NEVER EVER converse over the phone with any DCA or their wolves.

 

oh and i'll give you a free giggle...they've used the WRONG 3a Form

the one they've used is for Pers injury or family claims

which specifically states its not for consumer credit claims.

 

now I suspect they've 'accidentally' done this on purpose

because it makes it read DN/NOA are NOT required in CCA regulated cases..

 

CAG has spanked them +5 times now on their belief that default notices and assignment letters are NOT required to prove a case

THEY ARE!!!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send a CCA request anyway irrespective.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to fill in the reply form too and send that with the cca request

Ill point to filling out the form later

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?476735-What-To-Do-Simple-Prodedure-Rule-Claims-Scotland

Read the above sticky

What you need to put on the response form is at the end

 

DoNOT change anyrhing of our example bar any pers details

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread tidied

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going to fill out my reply form now, but must i make a duplicate copy of this form and also send it to the claimant also?

 

Reason i am asking this, as it states it on the Last Date for a response. Just double checking that i should send duplicate copy to the claimant as well as the court.

 

 

I have sent a CCA Request also, just waiting on a reply from them as they have received it on 7/6/18

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nolans

 

Well you dont want a reply think about.........

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nolans not the claimant

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

Received a response from Cabot in regards to my CCA request

 

They have thanked me for my request for information under the 77-79 of the consumer credit act 1974.

But say Unfortunatley currently do not have the relevant information on file, so will be requesting a copy of the credit agreement and terms from original lender.

They’d say this may take some time, it will write back within next 12 days.

Letter was send on 14th June.

I sent CCA on 6/6/18 and they received it on the 7/6/18.

 

When I send my response form tomorrow, should I attach a copy of this letter as proof of not being able To produce the information.

Or just send my reply as you have pointed out .

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats a Template response..its on every Cabot thread were a section 77/78 request has been made.

 

They are now in default and unable to enforce the agreement (12+2)

 

Simply state the same in your response..

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

where in box d2 our example says

To date the claimant has failed to comply & is in default of said request.

replace it with wot he says^^

They are now in default and unable to enforce the agreement (exceeded 12+2 working days limit)

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...