Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
    • Point taken that we should inform new Caggers that the £20 option is there in wrong registration cases.  Well, supposedly there, who knows what the PPCs would do in practice.  Anyway, the option is allegedly there with both the BPA as you say, but also the IPC (I've just checked). However, there's a danger here of baby, bathwater. The two easiest types of cases to win are (a) residential - due to Supremacy of Contract and (b) wrong registration - due to "de minimis".  Indeed until recently we has been boasting that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing. We simply can do nothing about a terrible judge.  The judge seems - I say seems because we haven't had all the details - to have ignored "de minimis",. got fixated on a sign and awarded unreasonable behaviour costs.  A totally bizarre judgement.
    • You mean your witness statement 
    • That may be your personal claimed experience I said i didn't want smart meters - you jumped in to recommend smart meters I quite clearly indicated I was happy with being in credit to maintain constant payments - you suggest paying what I owe every month I quite clearly indicated I was happy with being in credit to maintain constant payments - you suggest a variable tariff - even if its one that only varies on a daily basis rather than half/hourly - with prices higher in winter when you need it and lowest in summer when you need it least   politeness ends with: - I'm NOT interested in any smart tariff I see, You are pushing your smart meter + variable tariffs in the wrong place - try pushing them somewhere 'nearer to home'  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell chasing Fraudulent Three mobile phone contract


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

I would really appreciate some advice on how to handle the following:

 

My father, who is severely physically disabled and vulnerable, recently got a debt collection letter from Lowell alleging a £400 debt to three for a smartphone contract that was taken out over the phone.

 

My father is computer illiterate and never took out this contract.

It was likely taken out by his ex partner and carer in 2015.

 

I have written to three with a subject access request but all they have provided me with is copies of bills.

They say they do not have any recordings of phone conversations from the time the contract was entered into.

 

I need to know from them:

 

- What steps were taken to establish the identity of the person taking out the contract and protect my father from fraud?

- What bank account details are associated with this account or was the account opened without any bank account details?

- What date was the account opened?

- Who signed for the delivery of the device and where was the device delivered?

 

They have not yet provided me with any information.

How can I go about proving that this debt is not my fathers?

Is the onus on Lowell to prove this debt is his if we go to court?

Can they prove this debt with only bills as evidence?

 

My dad is very vulnerable and on a fixed income with lots of additional costs as he is currently moving into supported housing and has very complex health needs. He can not afford to pay this bill which is not his.

 

Advice very much appreciated.

 

Thank you

Em

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

title amended and moved to telecoms.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

firstly go onto the actiofraud site and get this registered as fraud and get the crime ref number.

then IMHO its best to write to the CEO of three and complain loudly that they have failed the sar and that if they do not provide the info required a serius complaint will be open with the ICO and the FOS and financial compensation WILL be sought.

 

as for lowells

you need to ENSURE that they have the correct address that the contract was taken out at [iF it is different from now]

 

it is rare , but they will attempt court if they can see a loophole like a wrong address to today.

 

is it possible to please scan up the letter received to date

read upload..ONE multipage PDF only please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

 

Thanks for the advice

 

 

I will visit the site and register it as a fraud and get a crime number - I will inform Lowell of this.

 

 

I have again written to 3 to request the information they did not provide. I will upgrade it to a complaint re: your advice about them failing the SAR if they do not provide it as requested. I have advised Lowell of this and reminded them that we are strongly disputing this debt. I have stated this to them since our first correspondence.

 

 

Lowells do have the correct address that the contact was taken out at, and it is different from now. As my dad's carer/partner had full access to his home, including keys etc, it appears that she did use his actual address to take out the contract (at least I assume so as this is the address on the bills that three sent to me).

 

 

I will upload a scan of the letter when I get home.

 

 

Thanks for the advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Hi

 

 

Thanks for the advice

 

 

I will visit the site and register it as a fraud and get a crime number - I will inform Lowell of this.

 

 

I have again written to 3 to request the information they did not provide. I will upgrade it to a complaint re: your advice about them failing the SAR if they do not provide it as requested. I have advised Lowell of this and reminded them that we are strongly disputing this debt. I have stated this to them since our first correspondence.

 

 

Lowells do have the correct address that the contact was taken out at, and it is different from now. As my dad's carer/partner had full access to his home, including keys etc, it appears that she did use his actual address to take out the contract (at least I assume so as this is the address on the bills that three sent to me).

 

 

I will upload a scan of the letter when I get home.

 

 

Thanks for the advice :)

 

 

A bill is sufficient actually. They are under no obligation to provide phone call recordings, not unless instructed by a Court Order. The onus is not for them to prove this isn't a fradulent case, it's for your father to prove it. Also, when you say you wrote to 3 mobile, do you have written authority from your father for you to act on his behalf?

 

 

 

They have bills proving this debt exist, you are alleging your father knew nothing about a contract taken out in 2015. It's difficult to prove this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...